Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Microscopy
16 November 2007
Experiment
Objective
Sample Preparation
Experimental Procedures
Results & Discussion
Fluorescence Microscopy
•Increase in contrast
•Chemical specificity
•Dissect different functional
aspects of biological
systems
Source: White, N.S. & Errington, R.J. (2005). Fluorescence techniques for drug delivery
research: theory and practice. Advanced drug delivery reviews 57 (2005) 17-42
Imaging of specific regions of
biological samples..
Source:
http://nobelprize.org/educational_games/physics/microscopes/fluorescence/gallery/index.html
Pulmonary artery. Human cells.
Source: 1. http:/nobelprize.org/educational_games/physics/microscopes/fluorescence/gallery/12.html
2. Excitation of Fluorophore
Principle
3. Stokes Shift
2. Shining Fluorescence Details. Basics of Light Microscopy and Imaging. Retrieved on Nov 10, 2007, from
http://www.microscopy.olympus.eu/microscopes/images/4_ShiningFluorescencedetails.pdf
Fluorescence Microscopy
2 key aspects
Fluorescence Microscope
Fluorescence Dyes
Olympus Fluorescent Microscope BX41
Olympus Fluorescent Microscope BX41
• Band-pass filters
• Different filter sets are used for
different dyes
Assembly of
Fluorescence Imaging System
Fluorochromes
• Simultaneous/
multiple staining
possible
• All fluorochromes
show distinct spectral
properties
Fluorochromes classification
Main experiments
Using Pancreatic β-cells (β-TC-6) sample
Additional experiments
Using Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells (HUVEC)
sample – FDA and PI dyes
Left to right
PI (PBS)– dark red 2mg/ml
DAPI (DMF) – light yellowish 1mg/ml
FDA (acetone) – colourless 5mg/ml
Experimental Procedures
1 2
3 Incubate
4
Adding dye to sample Wash with PBS
5 6 7
Placed on microscope stage Adjusted to the correct filter Fluorescent light source
(bright field light source)
Experiments Conducted:
1. Cell viability
2. Rate of fluorescein efflux
3. Cell fixation
1. Cell Viability
To determine which cells in a given
sample are living and which are dead.
Viability Staining
Overlapping
cells
Experiment with HUVEC Cells
Sample A Sample B
Trivia:
PI PI
Which sample is
living?
FDA FDA
2. Rate of Fluorescein Efflux
Observation: Background
noise increased over time for
fluorescein labeled cells.
Hypothesis: Fluorescein is
hydrolase
constantly being transported FDA Fluorescein
0 1 4 7 Time
(min)
Note: Not the same field of view
Fluorescein Efflux
• We observed
7 min
fluorescein efflux
but not PI or
DAPI efflux.
• PI and DAPI are
bound to the DNA
in the nucleus.
7 min
• Cannot be moved
out of the cells.
3. Cell Fixation
To determine the effect of fixation
(using pure methanol) on fluorescent
staining of cells.
Cell Fixation
Steps: Why it works:
b) NSOM d) Fluorescence
Figure :
Stained H9C2
individual cell
Reference : Ianoul, Anatoli. Melissa Street and Donna Grant. "Near-Field Scanning Fluorescence Microscopy
Study of Ion Channel." Biophysical Journal Volume 87 November 2004 3525–3535
Method Advantages Disadvantages
Out-of-focus flares
High sensitivity
Fluorescence High specificity in targeting
Presence of auto-fluorescence
Microscopy Photobleaching effect of
Easy and fast
fluorophores