Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Rietz
1
Diversification and the CAPM Diversification and the CAPM
The relationship between risk
and expected returns
1999 Thomas A. Rietz
2
ntroduction ntroduction
nvestors are concerned with
Risk
Returns
What determines the required
compensation Ior risk?
t will depend on
The risks Iaced by investors
The tradeoII between risk and return they Iace
1999 Thomas A. Rietz
Agenda Agenda
oncepts oI risk Ior
A single stock
PortIolios oI stocks
Risk Ior the diversiIied investor: Beta
alculating Beta
The relationship between Beta and Return:
The apital Asset Pricing Model (APM)
1999 Thomas A. Rietz
verview verview
nvestors demand compensation Ior risk
I investors hold 'diversiIied portIolios, risk
can be deIined through the interaction oI a
single investment with the rest oI the
portIolios through a concept called 'beta
The APM gives the required relationship
between 'beta and the return demanded
on the investment!
1999 Thomas A. Rietz
'ocabulary 'ocabulary
xpected return:
What we expect to receive
on average
Standard deviation oI
returns:
A measure oI dispersion
oI actual returns
orrelation
The tendency Ior two
returns to Iall above or
below the expected return
a the same or diIIerent
times
Beta
A measure oI risk
appropriate Ior diversiIied
investors
DiversiIied investors
nvestors who hold a
portIolio oI many
investments
The apital Asset
Pricing Model (APM)
The relationship between
risk and return Ior
diversiIied investors
i
i
i
r p r E
=
Measuring Expected Return Measuring Expected Return
We describe what we expect to receive or
the expected return:
OIten estimated using historical averages
(excel Iunction: 'average).
Example: Die Throw Example: Die Throw
Suppose you pay $300 to throw a Iair die.
You will be paid $100x(The Number rolled)
The probability oI each outcome is 1/6.
The returns are:
(100-300)/300 -66.67
(200-300)/300 -33.33 .etc.
The expected return (r) is:
1/6x(-66.67) 1/6x(-33.33) 1/6x0
1/6x33.33 1/6x66.67 1/6x100 16.67!
Example: EM Example: EM
Suppose
You buy and AAPLi contract on the M Ior $0.85
You think the probability oI a $1 payoII is 90
The returns are:
(1-0.85)/0.85 17.65
(0-0.85)/0.85 -100
The expected return (r) is:
0.9x17.65 - 0.1x100 5.88
Example: Market Returns Example: Market Returns
Recent data Irom the M shows the Iollowing
average monthly returns Irom 5/95 to 10/99:
(http://www.biz.uiowa.edu/iem/markets/compdata/compIund.html)
AAPL IBM MSFT SP500 T-BiIIs
Average Return 2.2% .6% .72% 1.7% 0.%
$
-
$
2
,
0
0
0
$
4
,
0
0
0
$
6
,
0
0
0
$
8
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
2
,
0
0
0
$
1
4
,
0
0
0
Apr-95
JuI-95
Oct-95
Jan-96
Apr-96
JuI-96
Oct-96
Jan-97
Apr-97
JuI-97
Oct-97
Jan-98
Apr-98
JuI-98
Oct-98
Jan-99
Apr-99
JuI-99
Oct-99
M
o
n
t
h
VaIue of Investment
A
A
P
L
B
M
M
S
F
T
S
P
0
0
T
-
B
i
l
l
(
2
)
G
r
o
w
t
h
o
f
$
1
0
0
0
n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
s
G
r
o
w
t
h
o
f
$
1
0
0
0
n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
s
2 2 2
2
i i
i
i i
i
i
Var r E r p r E r p o o = = =
OIten estimated using historical averages
(excel Iunction: 'stddev)
Measuring Risk: Standard Measuring Risk: Standard
Deviation and 'ariance Deviation and 'ariance
Standard Deviation in Returns:
Example: Die Throw Example: Die Throw
Recall the dice roll example:
You pay $300 to throw a Iair die.
You will be paid $100x(The Number rolled)
The probability oI each outcome is 1/6.
The expected return (r) is 16.67.
The standard deviation is:
56.93%
% 67 . 16 % 100
6
1
% 67 . 66
6
1
% 33 . 33
6
1
% 0
6
1
% 33 . 33
6
1
% 67 . 66
6
1
2 2 2
2 2
2 2
=
- + -
+ - + -
+ - + -
Example: EM Example: EM
Suppose
You buy and AAPLi contract on the M Ior $0.85
You think the probability oI a $1 payoII is 90
The returns are:
(1-0.85)/0.85 17.65
(0-0.85)/0.85 -100
The expected return (r) is:
0.9x17.65 - 0.1x100 5.88
The standard deviation is:
|0.9x(17.65)
2
0.1x(-100)
2
- 5.88
2
|
0.5
35.29
Example: Market Returns Example: Market Returns
Recent data Irom the M shows the Iollowing
average monthly returns & standard deviations
Irom 5/95 to 10/99:
(http://www.biz.uiowa.edu/iem/markets/compdata/compIund.html)
AAPL IBM MSFT SP500 T-BiIIs
Average Return 2.2% .6% .72% 1.7% 0.%
Std. Dev 1.8% 10.1% 8.22% .82% 0.06%
$
-
$
2
,
0
0
0
$
4
,
0
0
0
$
6
,
0
0
0
$
8
,
0
0
0
$
1
0
,
0
0
0
$
1
2
,
0
0
0
$
1
4
,
0
0
0
Apr-95
JuI-95
Oct-95
Jan-96
Apr-96
JuI-96
Oct-96
Jan-97
Apr-97
JuI-97
Oct-97
Jan-98
Apr-98
JuI-98
Oct-98
Jan-99
Apr-99
JuI-99
Oct-99
M
o
n
t
h
VaIue of Investment
A
A
P
L
B
M
M
S
F
T
S
P
0
0
T
-
B
i
l
l
(
2
)
G
r
o
w
t
h
o
f
$
1
0
0
0
n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
s
G
r
o
w
t
h
o
f
$
1
0
0
0
n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
s
Risk and Average Return Risk and Average Return
T-BiII
S&P500
MSFT
IBM
AAPL
0.0%
0.5%
1.0%
1.5%
2.0%
2.5%
3.0%
3.5%
4.0%
4.5%
5.0%
0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 14.0% 16.0%
Standard Deviation
A
v
e
r
a
g
e
R
e
t
u
r
n
Measures of Association Measures of Association
orrelation shows the association across
random variables
Variables with
Positive correlation: tend to move in the
same direction
Negative correlation: tend to move in
opposite directions
Zero correlation: no particular tendencies to
move in particular directions relative to each
other
p
AB
is in the range |-1,1|
OIten estimated using historical averages
(excel Iunction: 'correl)
ovariance in returns, o
AB
, is deIined as:
i i
i
i i i
i
i
r E r E r r p r E r r E r p = =
o
o o
o
p =
Covariance and Correlation Covariance and Correlation
The correlation, p
AB
, is deIined as:
otation for Two Asset and otation for Two Asset and
Portfolio Returns Portfolio Returns
tem Asset A Asset B PortIolio
Actual Return r
Ai
r
Bi
r
Pi
xpected Return (r
A
) (r
B
) (r
P
)
Variance o
A
2
o
B
2
o
P
2
Std. Dev. o
A
o
B
o
P
orrelation in Returns p
AB
ovariance in Returns o
AB
o
A
o
B
p
AB
Example: EM Example: EM
Suppose
You buy an MSFT090iH Ior $0.85 and a MSFT090iL
contract Ior $0.15.
You think the probability oI $1 payoIIs are 90 & 10
The expected returns are:
0.9x17.65 0.1x(-100) 5.88
0.1x566.67 0.9x (-100) -33.33
The standard deviations are:
|0.9x(17.65)
2
0.1x(-100)
2
- 5.88
2
|
0.5
35.29
|0.1x(566.67)
2
0.9x(-100)
2
- (-33.33)
2
|
0.5
200
The correlation is:
1 -
200% 35.29%
-33.33% 5.88% - -100% 566.67% 0.1 -100% 17.65% 0.9
=
-
- - - + - -
Example: Market Returns Example: Market Returns
Recent data Irom the M shows the Iollowing
monthly return correlations Irom 5/95 to 10/99:
(http://www.biz.uiowa.edu/iem/markets/compdata/compIund.html)
AAPL IBM MSFT SP500 T-BiIIs
AAPL 1.000 0.262 0.102 0.06 -0.10
BM 1.000 0.20 0.62 -0.169
MSFT 1.000 0.0 -0.07
SP00 1.000 -0.00
T-Bills 1.000
= 0.3777x + 0.0105
CorreI = 0.262
$0
$0
$0
$0
$-
$0
$0
$0
$0
$1
-20.00% -10.00% 0.00% 10.00% 20.00% 30.00% 40.00%
AAPL Return
I
B
M
R
e
t
u
r
n
Correlation of AAPL & BM Correlation of AAPL & BM
Risk and Average Return Risk and Average Return
T-BiII
S&P500
MSFT
IBM
AAPL
0.0%
0.5%
1.0%
1.5%
2.0%
2.5%
3.0%
3.5%
4.0%
4.5%
5.0%
0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 14.0% 16.0%
Standard Deviation
A
v
e
r
a
g
e
R
e
t
u
r
n
The standard deviation is not a linear
combination oI the individual asset standard
deviations
nstead, it is given by:
1 2 1 +
AB B A A A
2 2
A
2 2
A p
p o o o o o + =
% 08 . 10
262 . 0 1031 . 0 .1484 0 5 . 5x0 . 2x0
1031 . 0 5 . 0 1484 . 0 5 . 0
2 2 2 2
2
p
=
- - - +
- + -
= o
Two Asset Portfolios: Risk Two Asset Portfolios: Risk
The standard deviation a the 50/50, AAPL &
BM portIolio is:
The portIolio risk is lower than either individual
asset`s because oI diversiIication.
Correlations and Correlations and
Diversification Diversification
Suppose
(r)
A
16 and o
A
30
(r)
B
10 and o
B
16
onsider the (r)
P
and o
P
oI securities A
and B as w
A
and p vary...
Case 1: Perfect positive correlation Case 1: Perfect positive correlation
between securities, i.e., between securities, i.e., pp
AB AB
= +1 = +1
8%
9%
10%
11%
12%
1%
1%
1%
16%
17%
0% 10% 20% 0% 0%
Std. Dev.
E
x
p
.
R
e
t
.
(10%,16%)
(16%,0%)
Case 2: Zero correlation between Case 2: Zero correlation between
securities, i.e., securities, i.e., pp
AB AB
= 0. = 0.
8%
9%
10%
11%
12%
1%
1%
1%
16%
17%
0% 10% 20% 0% 0%
Std. Dev.
E
x
p
.
R
e
t
.
(10%,16%)
(16%,0%)
Min. 'ar.
(11.%,1.12%)
Case : Perfect negative correlation Case : Perfect negative correlation
between securities, i.e., between securities, i.e., pp
AB AB
= = - -1 1
8%
9%
10%
11%
12%
1%
1%
1%
16%
17%
0% 10% 20% 0% 0%
Std. Dev.
E
x
p
.
R
e
t
.
(10%,16%)
(16%,0%)
Zero 'ar.
(11.%,1.12%)
8%
9%
10%
11%
12%
1%
1%
1%
16%
17%
0% 10% 20% 0% 0%
Std. Dev.
E
x
p
.
R
e
t
.
r=1
r=0
r=-1
(10%,16%)
(16%,0%)
Comparison Comparison
2 +
2 +
2 +
MSFT IBM, MSFT IBM MSFT IBM
MSFT AAPL, MSFT AAPL MSFT AAPL
IBM AAPL, IBM AAPL IBM AAPL
2
MSFT
2
MSFT
2
IBM
2
IBM
2
AAPL
2
AAPL
p
p o o
p o o
p o o
o o o
o
+ +
=
Asset Portfolios: Expected Asset Portfolios: Expected
Returns and Standard Deviations Returns and Standard Deviations
Suppose the Iractions oI the portIolio are given
by w
AAPL
, w
BM
and w
MSFT
.
The expected return is:
(r
P
) w
AAPL
(r
AAPL
) w
BM
(r
BM
) w
MSFT
(r
MSFT
)
The standard deviation is:
% 59 . 3 0472 . 0
3
1
0364 . 0
3
1
0242 . 0
3
1
= - + - + - =
!
# E
% 75 . 7
240 . 0 0822 . 0 1031 . 0
3
1
3
1
2 +
102 . 0 0822 . 0 1484 . 0
3
1
3
1
2 +
262 . 0 1031 . 0 1484 . 0
3
1
3
1
2 +
0822 . 0
3
1
1031 . 0
3
1
1484 . 0
3
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
p
=
+ +
= o
For the aively Diversified For the aively Diversified
Portfolio, this gives: Portfolio, this gives:
For the aively Diversified For the aively Diversified
Portfolio, this gives: Portfolio, this gives:
T-BiII
S&P500
MSFT
IBM
AAPL
Naive
PortfoIio
0.0%
0.5%
1.0%
1.5%
2.0%
2.5%
3.0%
3.5%
4.0%
4.5%
5.0%
0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 14.0% 16.0%
Standard Deviation
A
v
e
r
a
g
e
R
e
t
u
r
n
The Concept of Risk With The Concept of Risk With
Risky Assets Risky Assets
As you increase the number oI assets in a
portIolio:
the variance rapidly approaches a limit,
the variance oI the individual assets contributes less
and less to the portIolio variance, and
the interaction terms contribute more and more.
ventually, an asset contributes to the risk oI a
portIolio not through its standard deviation but
through its correlation with other assets in the
portIolio.
This will Iorm the basis Ior APM.
PortIolio variance consists oI two parts:
1. Non-systematic (or idiosyncratic) risk and
2. Systematic (or covariance) risk
The market rewards only systematic risk
because diversiIication can get rid oI non-
systematic risk
risk
Systematic
ij
risk
systematic Non
i p
n n
o o o
'
+
'
+ =
1
1
1
2 2
'ariance of a naively diversified 'ariance of a naively diversified
portfolio of assets portfolio of assets
aive Diversification aive Diversification
0%
20%
0%
60%
80%
100%
1
1
0
1
9
2
8
8
2
9
1
1
0
0
Number of Assets
V
a
r
.
o
f
P
o
r
t
f
o
I
i
o
p=
p=2
p=0
ES
XRX
WMT
VIA
U
T
S
R
QUI
P
OAT
NOVL
MSFT
LE
K
JNJ
IBM
HWP
GE
F
EK
DE
CAT
BA
AAPL
-2%
-1%
0%
1%
2%
3%
4%
5%
6%
0.00% 5.00% 10.00% 15.00% 20.00%
Standard Deviation in Return
E
x
p
e
c
t
e
d
R
e
t
u
r
n
26 Risky Assets ver a 10 26 Risky Assets ver a 10
Year Period Year Period
Standard
Devaition
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
16%
1 7 9
1
1
1
1
7
1
9
2
1
2
Utility maximizing
risky-asset portIolio
&tility Maximization &tility Maximization
xpected
return (
i
)
Std dev ( o
i
)
+ =
The Capital Market Line The Capital Market Line
All investors Iace the same apital Market
Line (ML) given by:
Equilibrium Portfolio Returns Equilibrium Portfolio Returns
The ML gives the expected return-risk
combinations Ior eIIicient portIolios.
What about ineIIicient portIolios?
hanging the expected return and/or risk oI an
individual security will eIIect the expected return and
standard deviation oI the market!
n equilibrium, what a security adds to the risk oI
a portIolio must be oIIset by what it adds in
terms oI expected return
quivalent increases in risk must result in equivalent
increases in returns.
im X
N
m i i m im
i
N
FC
=
=
o o o p
2
1
ow is Risk Priced? ow is Risk Priced?
onsider the variance oI the market
portIolio:
t is the covariance with the market
portIolio and not the variance oI a security
that matters
ThereIore, the APM prices the
covariance with the market and not
variance per se
)
ER R ER R
here
i f m f i
i
i m im
m
im
m
= +
= =
.
.
o o p
o
o
o
2 2
The CAPM Pricing Equation! The CAPM Pricing Equation!
The expected return on any asset can be
written as:
This is simply the no arbitrage condition!
This is also known as the Security Market
Line (SML).
)
)
% 25 . 7 Er
75 . 0 035 . 0 085 . 0 035 . 0 Er
r Er r Er
IBM
IBM
i f m f i
=
+ =
+ = .
&sing the CAPM: Finding &sing the CAPM: Finding
E(r E(r
i i
) )
Suppose you have the Iollowing
inIormation:
r
I
3.5 (r
m
)8.5 .
BM
0.75
What should (r
BM
) be?
Answer:
)
)
)
)
75 . 0
035 . 0 085 . 0
035 . 0 725 0.0
035 . 0 085 . 0 035 . 0 725 0.0
r Er r Er
IBM
DE
i f m f i
=
=
+ =
+ =
.
.
.
&sing the CAPM: Finding &sing the CAPM: Finding ..
i i
Suppose you have the Iollowing
inIormation:
r
I
3.5 (r
m
)8.5 (r
BM
)7.25
What should .
BM
be?
Answer:
)
)
)
)
% 5 . 8 035 . 0
75 . 0
035 . 0 725 0.0
Er
035 . 0 725 0.0 75 . 0 035 . 0 Er
75 . 0 035 . 0 Er 035 . 0 725 0.0
r Er r Er
m
m
m
i f m f i
= +
=
=
+ =
+ = .
&sing the CAPM: Finding &sing the CAPM: Finding
E(rm) E(rm)
Suppose you have the Iollowing inIormation:
r
I
3.5 .
BM
0.75 (r
BM
)7.25
What should (r
m
) be?
Answer:
)
)
% 5 . 3
75 . 0 1
75 . 0 085 . 0 725 0.0
r
75 . 0 1 r 75 . 0 085 . 0 725 0.0
75 . 0 r 75 . 0 085 . 0 r 725 0.0
75 . 0 r 085 . 0 r 725 0.0
r Er r Er
f
f
f f
f f
i f m f i
=
=
=
+ =
+ =
+ = .
&sing the CAPM: Finding r &sing the CAPM: Finding r
ff
Suppose you have the Iollowing inIormation:
(r
m
)8.5 .
D
0.75 (r
D
)7.25
What should r
I
be?
Answer:
otes on Estimating b's otes on Estimating b's
Let r
it
, r
mt
and r
It
denote historical returns Ior
the time period t1,2,...,T.
The are two standard ways to estimate
historical .`s using regressions:
Use the Market Model: r
it
-r
It
-
i
.
i
(r
mt
-r
It
) e
it
Use the haracteristic Line: r
it
a
i
b
i
r
mt
e
it
-
i
a
i
(1-b
i
)r
It
and .
i
b
i
Typical regression estimates:
Value Line (Market Model):
5 Yrs, Weekly Data, VW NYS as Market
Merrill Lynch (haracteristic Line):
5 Yrs, Monthly Data, S&P500 as Market
Example Characteristic Line: Example Characteristic Line:
AAPL vs S&P00 (EM Data) AAPL vs S&P00 (EM Data)
= 0.1844x + 0.0182
R
2
= 0.0022
-40%
-30%
-20%
-10%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
-15% -10% -5% 0% 5% 10% 15%
S&P500 Premium
A
A
P
L
P
r
e
m
i
u
m
Example Characteristic Line: Example Characteristic Line:
BM vs S&P00 (EM Data) BM vs S&P00 (EM Data)
= 0.9837x + 0.0191
R
2
= 0.1325
-30%
-20%
-10%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
-15% -10% -5% 0% 5% 10% 15%
S&P500 Premium
I
B
M
P
r
e
m
i
u
m
Example Characteristic Line: Example Characteristic Line:
MSFT vs S&P00 (EM Data) MSFT vs S&P00 (EM Data)
= 1.1867x + 0.027
R
2
= 0.3032
-20%
-15%
-10%
-5%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
-15% -10% -5% 0% 5% 10% 15%
S&P500 Premium
M
S
F
T
P
r
e
m
i
u
m
otes on Estimating otes on Estimating ..'s 's
Betas Ior our companies
AAPL BM MSFT SP500
Raw: 0.1844 0.9838 1.1867 1
Adjusted: 0.4563 0.9891 1.1245 1
Avg. R: 2.42 3.64 4.72 1.75
Average Returns vs Average Returns vs
(Adjusted) Betas (Adjusted) Betas
MSFT
IBM
S&P500
AAPI
T-BiIIs
0.00%
0.50%
1.00%
1.50%
2.00%
2.50%
3.00%
3.50%
4.00%
4.50%
5.00%
- 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20
Beta
A
v
e
r
a
g
e
R
e
t
u
r
n
1999 Thomas A. Rietz
6
Summary Summary
State what has been learned
DeIine ways to apply training
Request Ieedback oI training session
1999 Thomas A. Rietz
6
Where to get more information Where to get more information
Other training sessions
List books, articles, electronic sources
onsulting services, other sources