Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
BY Dr. J K SACHDEVA
BY
Dr. J. K. SACHDEVA
VISITING FACULTY/COUNSELOR ITM, KHARGHAR IGNOU, STUDY CENTRE, SATHEYE COLLEGE, VILLE PARLE JDC-BYTCO, NASIK Chetana Institute of Management and Research, Bandra (E) SPECIAL SPEAKER ON MANAGERIAL ECONOMICS ALL INDIA RADIO FM , IGNOU-GYAN VANI PROGRAMMES
Contact me
9892728281 26670461 sachdevajk@hotmail.com www.rcssindia.org
As a graduate student...
To be able to read and understand the empirical literature in your field; to become a critical consumer of information.
To be able to both design and implement your thesis or dissertation as well as future studies that interest you.
Benefits to whom
As a future practitioner
To be able to intelligently participate in research projects, evaluations, and studies undertaken by your institution.
To understand the difference between scientifically acquired knowledge and other kinds of information.
Gathering information from resources such books or magazines isnt research. No contribution to new knowledge.
Merely transporting facts from one resource to another doesnt constitute research. No contribution to new knowledge although this might make existing knowledge more accessible.
What Research Is
Research is:
the systematic process of collecting and analyzing information (data) in order to increase our understanding of the phenomenon about which we are concerned or interested.1
a research method is a technique for (or way of proceeding in) gathering evidence" while "methodology is a theory and analysis of how research does or should proceed" and "an epistemology is a theory of knowledge"
Albert Einstein
Research Characteristics
1.
2.
3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8.
Originates with a question or problem. Requires clear articulation of a goal. Follows a specific plan or procedure. Often divides main problem into subproblems. Guided by specific problem, question, or hypothesis. Accepts certain critical assumptions. Requires collection and interpretation of data. Cyclical (helical) in nature.
Research Projects
The following kinds of projects usually dont make for good research:
Self-enlightenment. Comparing data sets. Correlating data sets. Problems with yes / no answers.
High-Quality Research
(1 of 2)
High-Quality Research
(2 of 2)
State that problem clearly and completely. Determine the feasibility of the research. Completely researchable units. Small in number. Add up to the total problem. Must be clearly tied to the interpretation of the data.
Identify subproblems:
Research
Theory
What exists? Why exists? What will happen in future?
Inductive Reasoning
( works moving from specific observation to broader generalisation, bottom approach)
Deductive Reasoning
( more general to more specific or top down approach)
Deductive Reasoning
Theory
Hypothesis Observation
Confirmation
Inductive Reasoning
Theory Hypothesis
Pattern
Observation
Positivism
Goal of Knowledge is to describe the phenomena that are experienced, There is interdependence of observation and theory, our observations are theory laden
Hypotheses
There is often a 1-1 correspondence between a subproblem and a hypothesis. Hypotheses can direct later research activities since they can help determine the nature of the research and methods applied.
Delimitations
All research has limitations and thus certain work that will not be performed. The work that will not be undertaken is described as the delimitations of the research.
Definitions
This helps remove significant ambiguity from the research itself by ensuring that reviewers, while they may not agree with your definitions, at least know what youre talking about.
Assumptions
Assumptions are those things that the researcher is taking for granted.
For example: a given test instrument accurately and consistently measures the phenomenon in question.
As a general rule youre better off documenting an assumption than ignoring it.
Overlooked assumptions provide a prime source of debate about a research projects results.
Many research problems have a kind of theoretical feel about them. Such projects often need to be justified:
Without this justification, it will prove difficult to convince others that the problem in question is worth study.
Research Proposals
Research proposals are documents that describe the intended research including:
Problem and subproblems. Hypotheses. Delimitations. Definitions. Assumptions. Importance. Literature review.
Literature Review
Without this step, you wont know if your problem has been solved or what related research is already underway.
Start searching professional journals. Begin with the most recent articles you can find. Keep track of relevant articles in a bibliography. Dont be discouraged if work on the topic is already underway.
Be very careful to check your sources when doing your literature review. Many trade magazines are not peer reviewed.
Professional conferences and journals often have each article reviewed by multiple people before it is even recommended for publication. The IEEE and ACM digital libraries are good places to start looking for legitimate research.
The Internet can be a good source of information. It is also full of pseudo-science and poor research. Make sure you verify the claims of any documentation that has not been peer reviewed by other professionals in the computing industry.
Research Process.
Common Methodologies.
Methodology Comparison.
Research Process
This isnt a weakness of the process but is part of the built-in error correction machinery. Because of the cyclic nature of research, it can be difficult to determine where to start and when to stop.
A question occurs to or is posed to the researcher for which that researcher has no answer.
This doesnt mean that someone else doesnt already have an answer.
The question needs to be converted to an appropriate problem statement like that documented in a research proposal.
This is at best a temporary solution since there is as yet no evidence to support either the acceptance or rejection of these hypotheses.
The available literature is reviewed to determine if there is already a solution to the problem.
Existing solutions do not always explain new observations. The existing solution might require some revision or even be discarded.
Its possible that the literature review has yielded a solution to the proposed problem.
On the other hand, if the literature review turns up nothing, then additional research activities are justified.
The researcher now begins to gather data relating to the research problem.
The means of data acquisition will often change based on the type of the research problem. This might entail only data gathering, but it could also require the creation of new measurement instruments.
The data that were gathered in the previous step are analyzed as a first step in ascertaining their meaning. As before, the analysis of the data does not constitute research.
The researcher interprets the newly analyzed data and suggests a conclusion.
This can be difficult. Keep in mind that data analysis that suggests a correlation between two variables cant automatically be interpreted as suggesting causality between those variables.
This may lead the researcher to cycle back to an earlier step in the process and begin again with a new hypothesis. This is one of the self-correcting mechanisms associated with the scientific method.
Common Methodologies
The individual steps within the methodology might vary based on the research being performed. Quantitative. Qualitative.
Methodology Comparison
Quantitative
Qualitative
Explanation, prediction Test theories Known variables Large sample Standardized instruments Deductive
Explanation, description Build theories Unknown variables Small sample Observations, interviews Inductive
Assessing Methods
Research Question(s) is/are key Methods must answer the research question(s) Methodology guides application Epistemology guides analysis
Ethnographies
+
Observational field work done in the actual context being studied Focus on how individuals interrelate in their own environment (and the influence of this environment) Difficult to interpret/analyze Time consuming/expensive Can influence subject behavior
Case Studies
+
Focus is on individual or small group Able to conduct a comprehensive analysis from a comparison of cases Allows for identification of variables or phenomenon to be studied Time consuming Depth rather than breadth Not necessarily representative
Survey Research
+
+ -
An efficient means of gathering large amounts of data Can be anonymous and inexpensive Feedback often incomplete Wording of instrument can bias feedback Details often left out
Focus Groups
+
Aid in understanding audience, group, users Small group interaction more than individual response Helps identify and fill gaps in current knowledge re: perceptions, attitudes, feelings, etc. Does not give statistics Marketing tools seen as suspect Analysis subjective
Discourse/Text Analysis
+
+ -
Examines actual discourse produced for a particular purpose (job, school) Helps in understanding of context, production, audience, and text Schedule for analysis not demanding Labor intensive Categories often fluid, making analysis difficult
+ + +
Isolates systematically the most important variables (often from case studies) and to quantify and interrelate them (often via survey or questionnaire) Possible to collect large amounts of data Not as disruptive Biases not as likely Data restricted to information available
Discourse/Text Analysis
+
+ -
Examines actual discourse produced for a particular purpose (job, school) Helps in understanding of context, production, audience, and text Schedule for analysis not demanding Labor intensive Categories often fluid, making analysis difficult
+ + +
Isolates systematically the most important variables (often from case studies) and to quantify and interrelate them (often via survey or questionnaire) Possible to collect large amounts of data Not as disruptive Biases not as likely Data restricted to information available
Classification forecasts a nominal variable (Major selection after taking 2311) Important in industry, education to predict behaviors Need substantial population Restricted range of variables can cause misinterpretation Variables cannot be added together; must be weighted and looked at in context of other variables
+ -
Naturalistic; allows for subjects to interact with environment Can use statistical analysis Seeks to further develop theory (not to influence action); Prescientific Coding schemes often arise from interplay between data and researchers knowledge of theory
Impossible to overlay structure Impossible to impose control Subject pool often limited, not representative Seen as more subjective, less rigorous Beneficial only in terms of initial investigation to form hypothesis
Random sampling, or selection, of subjects (which are also stratified) Introduction of a treatment Use of a control group for comparing subjects who dont receive treatment with those who do Adherence to scientific method (seen as positive, too) Must have both internal and external validity Treatment and control might seem artificial
+ -
Similar to Experiment, except that the subjects are not randomized. Intact groups are often used (for example, students in a classroom). To draw more fully on the power of the experimental method, a pretest may be employed. Employ treatment, control, and scientific method Act of control and treatment makes situation artificial Small subject pools
Meta-Analysis
+
+ +
+
-
Takes the results of true and quasi-experiments and identifies interrelationships of conclusions Systematic Replicable Summarizes overall results C/C apples and oranges? Quality of studies used?
Tests the validity of generalizations Seen as rigorous Identifies a cause-and-effect relationship Seen as more objective, less subjective Can be predictive
Generalizations need to be qualified according to limitation of research methods employed Controlled settings dont mirror actual conditions; unnatural Difficult to isolate a single variable Doesnt allow for self-reflection (built-in)
How do you come up with a good research question? How do you determine if the method you plan to use will answer your question? What epistemology should you use to analyze data?
Quantitative Methods
Thanks