Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
prepared by
chapter 3
Analysis of Financial Statements
3-3
Topics in Chapter
CH3
Ratio analysis Trend, common-size and percentage change analysis Du Pont system Uses and limitations of ratio analysis
3-4
Income Statement
CH3
2009 Net sales Op. costs excluding depre. & amort. EBITDA Depre. & amort. EBIT Int. expense EBT Taxes (40%) Net income 3,000.0 2,616.2 $383.8 100.0 $283.8 88.0 $195.8 78.3 $117.5
Copyright 2011 by Nelson Education Ltd. All rights reserved.
2008 2,850.0 2,497.0 $353.0 90.0 $263.0 60.0 $203.0 81.2 $121.8
3-5
2009
Accts. payable Notes payable Accruals Total CL Long-term bonds Total liabilities Pref. stock (400,000 shares) Com. Stock (50,000,000 shares) Ret. earnings Total common equity Total L&E 60 110 140 $310 754 $1,064 40 130 766 $896 $2,000
Copyright 2011 by Nelson Education Ltd. All rights reserved.
2008
30 60 130 $220 580 $800 40 130 710 $840 $1,680
3-7
Other Data
CH3
Stock price # of shares EPS DPS CFPS BVPS Lease payments Tax rate
2009 2008 $23.00 $26.00 50,000,000 50,000,000 $2.27 $2.36 $1.15 $1.06 $4.27 $4.16 $17.92 $16.80 $28 $28 0.4 0.4
3-8
3-9
Liquidity: Can we make required payments as they fall due? Asset management: Do we have the right amount of assets for the level of sales? Debt management: Do we have the right mix of debt and equity? Profitability: Do sales prices exceed unit costs, and are sales high enough as reflected in PM, ROE, and ROA? Market value: Do investors like what they see as reflected in P/E and M/B ratios?
Copyright 2011 by Nelson Education Ltd. All rights reserved.
3-10
CA CR09 = CL
Comments on CR and QR
CH3
Expected to worsen and still below the industry average. Liquidity position is weak. Shareholders may not want a high CR
Copyright 2011 by Nelson Education Ltd. All rights reserved.
3-12
Sales Inv. turnover = Inventories $3,000 = = 4.90x $615 2009 Inv. T. 4.9 x 2008 6.9x Ind. 9.0x
3-13
Inventory turnover is below industry average. Firm might have old inventory, or its control might be poor. True turnover will be overstated when sales are stated at market prices, but inventories are recorded at historical cost
Copyright 2011 by Nelson Education Ltd. All rights reserved.
3-14
DSO =
= Receivables Sales/365
3-15
Appraisal of DSO
CH3
Firm collects too slowly, and situation is getting worse. Poor credit policy.
DSO
2009 46
2008 40
Ind. 36
3-16
3-17
APP: Interpretation
CH3
With an industry average of 9 days, the firm is doing fine with sufficient cash flow to pay bills on time. If APP is significantly longer than the credit term provided, firm will be at risk of losing those credit terms. If APP is lower than the credit terms offered, firm has not taken advantage of the free financing from suppliers.
Copyright 2011 by Nelson Education Ltd. All rights reserved.
3-18
Fixed assets Sales = turnover Net fixed assets $3,000 = 3.0x = $1,000 Total assets = turnover Sales Total assets $3,000 = 1.5x = $2,000
3-19
FA turnover is equal to the industry average suggesting that the firm has about the right amount of fixed assets in relation to other firms. TA turnover not up to industry average caused by excessive current assets (A/R and inventory).
Total liabilities Debt ratio = Total assets $310 + $754 = = 53.2% $2,000 EBIT TIE = Int. expense $283.8 = 3.2x = $88
Copyright 2011 by Nelson Education Ltd. All rights reserved.
3-21
= 3.0x
3-22
D/A TIE EC
2009 2008 Ind. 53.2% 47.6% 40.0% 3.2x 4.4x 6.0x 3.0x 0.8x 4.3x
3-23
$113.5 NI PM = Sales = $3,000 = 3.8% PM 2009 3.8% 2008 4.1% Ind. 5.0%
Very bad in 2009, because of high costs. It is resulted from inefficient operations or heavy use of debt.
Copyright 2011 by Nelson Education Ltd. All rights reserved.
3-24
3-25
BEP removes effect of taxes and financial leverage. Useful for comparison. BEP is below average probably due to the low turnover ratios and low profit margin on sales. Room for improvement.
BEP
3-26
3-27
(More)
Copyright 2011 by Nelson Education Ltd. All rights reserved.
3-28
ROA ROE
3-29
ROA is lowered by debt--interest expense lowers net income, which also lowers ROA. However, the use of debt lowers equity, and if equity is lowered more than net income, ROE would increase.
3-30
Price = $23.00 NI $113.5m EPS = Shares out. = 50m = $2.27 Price per share $23.00 P/E = = $2.27 = 10.1X EPS
Copyright 2011 by Nelson Education Ltd. All rights reserved.
3-31
NI + Depr. CF per share = Shares out. $113.5 + $100.0 = = $4.27 50 Price per share P/CF = Cash flow per share = $23.00 = 5.4x $4.27
Copyright 2011 by Nelson Education Ltd. All rights reserved.
3-32
Com. equity BVPS = Shares out. $896m = 50m = $17.92 Mkt. price per share M/B = Book value per share $23.00 = $17.92 = 1.3x
Copyright 2011 by Nelson Education Ltd. All rights reserved.
3-33
P/E: How much investors will pay for $1 of earnings. Higher is better. M/B: How much paid for $1 of book value. Higher is better. P/E and M/B are high if ROE is high, risk is low.
3-34
3-35
2009 2008 0.5% 0.9% 0.0% 3.9% 18.8% 18.8% 30.8% 24.7% 50.0% 48.2% 50.0% 51.8% 100.0% 100.0%
Copyright 2011 by Nelson Education Ltd. All rights reserved.
Assets AP Notes pay. Accruals Total CL LT Bonds Total Liabilities Pref. stock Total com. eq. Total L&E
2009 2008 Ind. 3.0% 1.8% 1.8% 5.5% 3.6% 4.4% 7.7% 3.6% 7.0% 15.5% 13.1% 9.8% 37.7% 34.5% 30.2% 53.2% 47.6% 40.0% 2.0% 2.4% 0.0% 44.8% 50.0% 60.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
3-37
The company has higher proportion of inventory and current assets than Industry. The company has less equity (which means more debt) than Industry. The company now has zero shortterm debt, but more long-term debt than industry.
Copyright 2011 by Nelson Education Ltd. All rights reserved.
3-38
2009 Net sales Op.costs EBITDA Depr. EBIT Int. Exp. EBT Taxes NI before pref. div. Pref. dividends NI (profit margin) 100.0% 87.2% 12.8% 3.3% 9.5% 2.9% 6.5% 2.6% 3.9% 0.1% 3.8%
2008 100.0% 87.6% 12.4% 3.2% 9.2% 2.1% 7.1% 2.8% 4.3% 0.1% 4.1%
Ind. 100.0% 87.6% 12.4% 2.8% 9.6% 1.3% 8.3% 3.3% 5.0% 0.0% 5.0%
3-39
The company has similar operating cost (87.2) as industry (87.6), but slightly higher depreciation and amortization. Result is that the company has similar EBIT. However, the high interest expense lowers the EBT (6.5) compared to industry (8.3).
Copyright 2011 by Nelson Education Ltd. All rights reserved.
3-40
Base year (2008) Net sales Operating costs EBITDA Depr. & Amortization EBIT Int. Exp. EBT Taxes @40% NI before pref. dividends Preferred dividends NI
% in 2009 5.3% 4.8% 8.7% 11.1% 7.9% 46.7% (3.5%) (3.5%) (3.5%) 0.0% (3.7%)
3-41
We see that 2009 sales grew 5.3% from 2008, and that NI fell 3.7% from 2008. So the company has become less profitable. The analysis reveals whether the firms condition has been improving or deteriorating over time. Similar analysis can be performed on the balance sheet.
Copyright 2011 by Nelson Education Ltd. All rights reserved.
3-42
3-43
)(
TA turnover
)(
x
Sales x TA
TA CE
= ROE.
3-44
NI Sales x Sales TA
TA CE 2.23=
= ROE 12.7%
3-45
Comparison with industry averages is difficult if the firm operates many different divisions. Average performance is not necessarily good. Seasonal factors can distort ratios.
3-46
Window dressing techniques can make statements and ratios look better. Different accounting and operating practices can distort comparisons.
3-47
Sometimes it is difficult to tell if a ratio value is good or bad. Often, different ratios give different signals, so it is difficult to tell, on balance, whether a company is in a strong or weak financial condition.
3-48