Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Rushen Chahal
Shareholder Value
Transforming Beliefs
Transforming Behaviour
The ultimate test of management is value creation Top quality CEOs deliver consistently superior shareholder returns New fangled measures like EBITDA and EVA are not enough. There are no magic methodologies Each management team needs to set out on a journey of learning together which will transform their beliefs, their behaviour and their performance
TRANSFORMING BELIEFS
Old Beliefs
New Beliefs
We must achieve multiple objectives We must balance the demands of multiple stakeholders Global growth Best in industry
Our single purpose and governing objective is to maximise shareholder value Maximising shareholder value maximises value for all the stakeholders: there is no conflict Selective market leadership If world class means anything, it means world class in value creation
The governing objective of the company should be to maximise shareholder value, not growth
Maximising good growth and eliminating bad growth is essential to achieving the governing objective
Maximising strategic and organisational effectiveness is essential to achieving the governing objective
Common Issues Competing goals Strategies which focus on growth not value Management processes which focus on growth not value Management remuneration, rewards and recognition which reflect a focus on growth not value Lack of good information Reluctance to lose a customer or product Management beliefs
ATTITUDE TO RISK
Replace the concepts of balance and diversity with the concepts of focus and competitive advantage
It used to be thought that diversifying your risk reduces your risk. Not if it ends up in weak market positions and low, or negative, cash flow The real risk is that you enter markets in which you dont have competitive advantage Chasing market share frequently ends in tears. Profitability and competitive advantage result in high growth and share - not the other way round Companies with high multiples have chosen focus over diversity Outsource diversification to shareholders
Dispose of companies (and parts of companies) which cannot earn a return above the cost of equity Reallocate equity away from the businesses which cannot create enough value (where you cannot be distinctive enough) Acquire companies which broaden and strengthen competitive advantage
Move from approving plans, to demanding new learning through debating issues and alternatives
Demanding focus and follow-through Cascading down the business Demanding learning and innovation Setting the right standard for strategy choices (the value of the next business alternative Transparency Significant thought and debate at all levels
3 - 5 Alternatives
New Behaviour
Alternative strategies represent different choices for one or more of five dimensions of any (Value Centres) strategy
1.
Business proposition: How the business will achieve a profitable strategic position (in terms of market economics and competitive position) Participation strategy: What product market segments to target for continued participation, entry or exit Offering strategy: Operating strategy: Pricing strategy: Whether and how to differentiate (customer perspective) Whether and how to differentiate (operating perspective) How to price for improved market economics or competitive position (or both)
2. 3. 4. 5.
ORGANISATION STRUCTURE
Move from managing the value of the Group as one business, to managing the value of the Group through multiple value centres
Multiple Product Specialist Value Centres Value Centres for Products and Customer Relationships
Market-Based Segmentation
Change organisation structure to ensure clarity of accountability for value e.g, accountability for market segments Change organisation structure to ensure new learning about new sources of competitive advantage Delegate accountability for value as close as possible to the customer and competition Avoid excessive centralisation
DIAGNOSIS
In which products and markets are we creating value?
Value creation A B C
Observations
Most companies do not have the information needed to measure the value of their individual businesses
G H
Cross-subsidisation is common
ECONOMIC PROFIT
Economic Profit tells us how much value is being created Economic Profit is the profit attributable to shareholders less a notional charge for the equity invested in the business It is the only measure that brings together both the growth in equity and the return on that equity Because Economic Profit measures the value being created, it allows us to evaluate alternative strategies that might create more value Senior management incentive awards based on Economic Profit
A FINANCIAL DISCIPLINE
Economic Profit measures are an integral part of the strategy development process The strategy development process creates the conditions and enforces the financial standards for developing the highest-value strategies on a continuous basis in every business unit The strategy development process, using Economic Profit measures, instils a financial discipline into the company: To avoid investing resources in areas of poor growth prospects or poor returns To encourage a continuous review of existing and alternative strategies that deliver demanding performance targets
Insist upon alternative, higher value, business strategies Each value centre needs as a strategy showing how they will obtain a competitive advantage and the effect on economic profit In any given year, some value centres may be growing rapidly while others are stable or declining For the group as a whole, the reallocation of resources by value centre, by product, by customers, by channel increases economic profit substantially when process fully implemented
What collection of divestments, acquisitions and reallocations of capital is necessary to change our return on equity, market value, access to capital and ability to sustain good growth?
APPROACH TO M&A
Move from an acquisitions strategy, to acquisition as the manifestation of strategy Strategic Fit Dont let acquisitions determine your strategy A ready meeting of minds on what business is about A model to improve both parties competitive position Focusing on how the model will work Agreeing a price where both benefit Demonstrating success without a heavy hand Re-establishing the Governing Objective
Pre-Merger Discussions
Post-Merger Integration
- Traditional measures of industry/market attractiveness - Revenue side synergies - Acquisition proposals with little or no integration plan
The key to success The deal is won or lost after the deal is done A compelling, ambitious vision shared by the shareholders and management alike Meticulous preparation for integrating organisational structures, processes and cultures Speedy execution
CONCLUSIONS
Mergers and acquisitions can transform a business, but they can also be a risky, uncertain means of achieving shareholder value Poor due diligence Hidden merger costs Massive leadership challenge Unpredictable events Does it fit with our current strategy? Is it a manifestation of it? Is it capable of integration with our existing business? Will it enhance our competitive advantage? Do the economics stand up to the test? Most acquisitions are killed by the premium required, which cannot be recaptured.
Some lessons
Constant pursuit of higher value alternatives Organisational alternatives Structure Processes Information Capabilities Strategic alternatives Participation Offering Operating Pricing Portfolio Affiliation benefits
Superior discipline for eliminating unprofitable use of resources Unprofitable products Unprofitable customers Unprofitable markets Unprofitable activities R&D Manufacturing Distribution Central services
Transforming Beliefs
Transforming Behaviour
Over the 17 years ended December 2000, Lloyds Bank shareholders saw the value of their investment, with dividends reinvested, increase over 65 times, doubling and redoubling total shareholder return every 35 months There were no a priori prescriptions and no magic methodologies It involved a journey of learning together
CONCLUSION
Managing for value is different Managing for value must be tailored to each companys needs and style Managing for value works BUT Generating consistently superior shareholder returns is the most challenging task a company can set for itself It is a tough discipline to accept People will wriggle like mad to escape the discipline It requires extraordinary commitment and belief to stick to it over the long haul