Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Brain Fingerprinting
Background
Brain fingerprinting: technique used to determine scientifically what information is, or is not stored in a particular brain Not a measure of guilt or innocence Measures the response to visual or audio stimulus
Applications
Counter
terrorism
security diagnosis
National Medical
Advertising
Criminal
justice system
Case
Admissibility
in court
Counter terrorism:
Brain fingerprinting can help address the following critical elements in the fight against terrorism: 1: Aid in determining who has participated in terrorist acts, directly or indirectly. 2: Aid in identifying trained terrorists with the potential to commit future terrorist acts, even if they are in a sleeper cell and have not been active for years.
3: Help to identify people who have knowledge or training in banking, finance or communications and who are associated with terrorist teams and acts.
National Security
Identify terrorists and accomplices prior to attacks by determining whether specific information is embedded in the memory of the subject
Medical Field
Alzheimers Disease Detects P300 brainwave Symptoms reversible through dietary and medicinal changes
Pharmeceutical companies See effects of new medication Doctors can monitor treatments and adjust them
Advertising
Brain fingerprinting allows advertisers to determine what information from an ad is retained in memory What elements do people pay attention to What type of media is most effective How to advertise to people all over the world
Criminal Justice
Used with MERMER technology FBI and CIA endorsed to convict criminals P300 brainwave is emitted if a memory of presented stimulus exists in the brain Difference between perpetrator and the innocent is the memory of the crime scene embedded in the brain
Case studies:
Farwell was faced with an immediate and obvious problem: 24 years had passed since the trial. Evidence had been presented and transcripts published long ago; the details of the crime had long since come to light.
What memories of the crime were left to probe? But Farwell combed the transcripts and came up with obscure details about which to test Harrington. Harrington was granted a new trial when it was discovered that some of the original police reports in the case had been missing at his initial trial.
By 2001, however, most of the witnesses against Harrington had either died or had been discredited. Finally, when a key witness heard that Harrington had "passed" his brain fingerprinting test, he recanted his testimony and the prosecution threw up its hands. Harrington was set free
The
theory and practice of Brain Fingerprinting have gained general acceptance in the relevant scientific community. Brain Fingerprinting is non-invasive and non-testimonial.
Farwell Brain Fingerprinting has been subjected to rigorous peer review under US government sponsorship, and has been found scientifically viable as well as revolutionary in its implications.
Medical diagnosis
Can
Advertising
Criminal justice
Puts
Focus
Cons
Infringement
Constant
testing for new products can become time consuming and expensive Must find random people to use as test subjects
Possibility
of