Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Update on NSF
Henrik S. Thomsen
Department of Diagnostic Sciences Faculty of Health Sciences University of Copenhagen DENMARK
NSF
A horrible adverse reaction
Nephrogenic Systemic Fibrosis (NSF), previously called Nephrogenic Fibrosing Dermopathy, was described in 1997, but was only linked to exposure to gadolinium based contrast media in 2006.
Difficult Diagnosis
High risk
Optimark, Omniscan, Magnevist
Moderate risk
Primovist, Vasovist, Multihance
Low risk
Dotarem, Gadovist, Prohance
Risk management
Many registries
Yale university (NSF registry) Medwatch (FDA) Medicines Agencies in Europe The Vendors ESUR ACR Contrast Media Committee The published literature Results in confusion and uncertainty
232
2008: 10 months
Cases
190
Cases
1st Meta-analysis
According to Hills criteria: For GdCA in general and gadodiamide in particular, there was a strong and consistent association between exposure and development of NSF. A clear temporal sequence was reported. A dose-response relationship was shown. No published cases ascribed to gadoteridol and gadobenate were identified.
Cases
Europe
Underreporting?
Is it likely that Denmark (30) & Switzerland (18) have 50% of the cases but only 2% of the population?
104
As of March 11 2008
European experience
The EU database has only 8 Swiss cases. According to the EU database there are 3 cases in Austria, but Grobner reported 5 cases in his original paper (he has 6 cases now). At ECR another Austrian group reported 6 cases.
European experience
There is an uneven distribution of original reports/ case reports in the peer-reviewed literature: Denmark 29 cases Austria 5 cases France 1 case Spain - 9 cases The Netherlands 1 case 60 cases --Belgium 3 cases 58% of the United Kingdom 14 cases
European fact
Other figures
European experience
Some hospitals are now reporting that they have reviewed their nephrology patients. For example University of Basel has performed ~27,000 enhanced MRI examinations from 2002 through 2007. University of Paris reviewed their 308 nephrology patients (73 % had CKD 4 or 5). Common for these institutions they have not used non-ionic linear chelates.
Notice
Most studies are derive from search on databases e.g. Dialysis registries Dermatopathology files Rheumatology files Dermatology files Radiology Information Systems
Underestimate in many instances
18 %
(CI: 11-27) 12 % (CI: 6-21)
36 % (CI: 18-59)
In biopsies (several patients had more than one biopsy) an increasing amount of gadolinium has been shown in the skin up to three years after the last exposure to Gd-CA.
Where does it come from?
Gd accumulates in skin and bone of rodents with normal renal function. The amount of accumulated Gd varies between the various agents.
Yearly enhanced MR
- women with BRACA-genes
Pathophysiology of NSF
Contentious subject
2002-2008
Injections in nephrology patients
NSF
Herlev Hospital - unpublished
30 340
0 >200
No NSF
2002-2007
Injections in inflammatory nephrology patients
NSF
Univ Wisconsin Home page
6 125
0 101
No NSF
Possible co-factors
Erythropoietin Inflammation Inhibitors of angiotensin converting enzyme Induced antibodies against phospholipids Dialyzate fluid Hepatorenal renal syndrome Recent surgery Thrombotic events Metabolic acidosis
All the proposed co-factors cannot be confirmed to be necessary co-factors. There are probably many co-factors which together with the gadolinium-based contrast agent can trigger NSF.
IN EUROPE
Gadodiamide + Magnevist + Optimark
CONTRAINDICATED in
patients with CKD 4 and 5 (GFR < 30 ml/min), including those on dialysis patients with reduced renal function who have had or are awaiting liver transplantation
IN EUROPE
All patients should be screened, in particular patients over the age of 65, for renal dysfunction by obtaining a history and/or laboratory tests.
Observation
The risk of inducing NSF must always be weighed against the risk of denying patients gadolinium enhanced scans which are important for patient management.
Conclusion
We dont have an appropriate overview of the problem, including pathophysiology.
EMEA has chosen a different approach than FDA: NSF is not a class phenomenon. We cant for the time being exclude that NSF is only of the tip of the gadolinium toxicity iceberg.
It seems like that we introduced NSF and that we can erase it again.
Use in all patients an agent that leaves the smallest amount of gadolinium.