Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
If you feel that your statistical background is particularly weak, start by reading this!!
+
Note: research methods is different from other modules you will be taught, e.g. International Business, HR or Marketing.
Think of research methods as your toolkit to carry out and assess academic work.
Exploration (What is going on?) Description (What is going on?) Explanation (Why is it going on?)
A researcher may ask descriptive questions; e.g. is the level of inequality increasing or decreasing; is there economic convergence or divergence across regions. What questions often provoke why questions: (why is this happening?) Much research deals with why something is going on (explanatory research). Why do firms in a specific location perform better compared with firms located in other regions?
Explanatory research
It is one thing to describe the profitability of firms across countries/sectors, or change in performance over time; its another thing to develop an explanation as to why profitability is as high as it is, why some sectors perform well and others not. Answering why questions involves developing causal explanations. These explanations argue that a phenomenon Y is caused by a phenomenon X. Some causal explanations will be simple others may be very complex.
Explanatory research
1. Direct causal relationship
R&D
2. Indirect causal relationship
Productivity
R&D
3.
Innovation
Capital investment Skills
Productivity
Innovation
Productivity
Government support
Co-variation of GDP per capita and number of telephones per household Co-variation between number of storks and number of births Also consider the following: The number of police officers in a city is positively correlated with the number of murders committed. The number of fire engines at a fire is positively correlated with the damage caused by the fire.
Clearly, you would not conclude that the number of police officers or fire engines cause an increase in murder or damages by fire.
Most people tend to agree that money has some influence over election outcomes Indeed election data shows a correlation between money spent by a candidate during the election campaign and election outcomes
But, just because two factors X and Y are correlated does not mean they cause one another. The correlation does not tell you anything about the direction of the relationship: from X to Y, or from Y to X (issue of reverse causality) Or, it is possible that another factor Z causes both X and Y (third variable effect)
Consider reverse causality: Lets assume you are the sort of person who would contribute to the campaign of a candidate 1,000. When are you likely to give that money? A close race, in which you think money will influence the outcome Or a campaign in which one candidate is a sure winner and you are expecting some future in-kind considerations The one candidate you wont support is a sure loser! Consider third variable effects: Picture two candidates; one intrinsically appealing and the other not. The appealing candidate raises much more money and wins the election. Now, was it the money that won the election, or, was it the appeal that won both the money and the election?
Research design
The function of a research design is to ensure that the evidence obtained enables us to answer the initial question as unambiguously as possible!
e.g. money buys elections or candidates appeal attracts money and wins elections
.
Proposition s
Interview Interview Interview Interview (standardized/ (standardized/ (standardized/ (standardized/ unstandardized) unstandardized) unstandardized) unstandardized) Observation Analysis of documents Observation Analysis of documents Observation Analysis of documents Observation Analysis of documents
Do not make the mistake of confusing design with data collection methods.
What is qualitative research? Why choose a qualitative approach? Qualitative research designs Collection of qualitative data Analysis of qualitative data Quality issues
Qualitative research
Based on meanings expressed through words and non-numerical
Collection results in nonstandardised data requiring classification into categories Analysis through the use of conceptualisation
The word qualitative implies an emphasis on the qualities of entities and on processes and meanings that are not experimentally examined or measured (if measured at all) in terms of quantity, amount, intensity or frequency. Qualitative research stress the socially constructed nature of reality, the intimate relationship between the researcher and what is studied, and the situational constraints that shape enquiry
A means for exploring and understanding the meaning individuals or groups ascribe to a social and human problem involves emerging questions and procedures, data typically collected in the participants setting, data analysis inductively building from particulars to general themes, and the researcher making interpretations of the meaning of the data the importance of rendering the complexity of the situation
Qualitative research methods are designed to help researchers understand people and what they say or do (and to) understand the social and cultural context within which people live if you want to understand peoples motivations, their reasons, their actions, and the context for their beliefs and actions in an in-depth way, qualitative research is best
Research design
Philosophical worldviews Strategies of inquiry Specific research methods
Philosophical worldviews
a basic set of beliefs that guide action Epistemology, ontology i.e. (post)positivism, social constructivism
Strategies of Inquiry
Focus on phenomena that occur in their natural settings, in the real world Study those phenomena in all their complexity Social relations and human behaviour cannot be studied by natural science methods interpretation and meaning are crucial There is no single truth but multiple perspectives
The easy way out (-) Large samples, generalization to a large population (-) Trends or patterns that apply in many situations (-) Exploration (+) Rich/thick description (+) Interpretation (+) Particular context (+) Validation of statistical findings (+) Evaluation (+) Cause-effect relationships (?)
Ethnography
Study of the everyday behaviour (e.g., interactions, language, rituals) in order to identify norms, beliefs, structures Fieldwork Observation
Phenomenology
Focus on a persons perceptions, perspectives and understanding of a particular situation Open-ended interviewing
Grounded theory
The discovery of theory from data Application of a systematic set of procedures to develop an inductively derived grounded theory about a phenomenon Starts from separate data, proceeds with coding, conceptualization and theory building
Narrative methods
Stories rather than words as units Organizational stories provide unique insight into organizational life Critique of grounded theory
Action research
Interactive inquiry process Problem solving actions implemented in a collaborative context and data-driven collaborative analysis or research The purpose is to understand underlying causes enabling the solving of specific problems in relation to personal and organizational change
Sampling
Random sampling (representativeness) Generalized knowledge from a few cases or even one case? Purposeful sampling (e.g. theoretical sampling, intensity sampling, maximum variation, deviant cases)
Observation
The systematic observation, recording, description, analysis and interpretation of peoples behaviour Participant observation... implies a research strategy of immersion (by the researcher) in the research setting, with the objective of sharing peoples lives while attempting to learn their symbolic world Research as an employee Observation alone Semi-concealed research
Interviews
Structured interviews Semi-structured interviews Unstructured or in-depth interviews Respondent interviews Informant interviews One-to-one: Face to face interviews One-to-one: Telephone interviews One to many: Focus group interviews
Quantitative research: data collection, data analysis and data interpretation are distinct separate stages No clear distinction data collection/data analysis/data interpretation in qualitative research
Internal validity: accuracy of the findings (finding the truth)? potentially high! validity strategies External validity: to what extent can the results from a study be generalised beyond that study? contextual knowledge, conscious choice Reliability: how to apply consistent methods that secure stability of findings? many problems (i.e. observer bias) reliability procedures Additional quality criteria (trustworthiness, credibility, authenticity)