Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
in Public Office
Click to edit Master subtitle style
Presented by
GROUP
APRIL 2012
PRESENTATION OUTLINE
Introduction Background of the case Key Talking Points Conclusions and Recommendations References and Bibliography
APRIL 2012
Introduction
The Robin Hud case, traces its history from the popular tale where a certain individual was noted to be stealing from the rich or the state to pursue a worthy course which was usually charitable. This issue has become evident in most government institutions in most parts of the world. Here in Ghana, this Robin Hud case manifested itself in the late 1970s and 1980s with a lot of ramifications. .
APRIL 2012
APRIL 2012
1.
Was Andersons action ethically justified? Is it ethical for a public official or employee to use public office and resources to pursue a personal agenda, however laudable? Is a private contractor such as Anderson also bound by our response to the above? Does our response change if that agenda is based on basic religious beliefs? Family loyalties? Policy preferences? The consequence if everyone acted as Anderson did? What would be the consequences for public policy? For public trust? For a government under law? Is the ethical offencetheftdefined by the use of the resources? Does it matter whether personal gain or charity was the purposes? Is it ethical to use immoral means to accomplish moral ends? Contributing Factors to MWHUDs problems
2012 EMBA GROUP 6 Recommendations for Minister Jack Ewusi Kramppah
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
1.
What is moral is what you feel good after, and what is immoral is what you feel bad after. ~ Ernest Hemmingway
The law is the center of gravity in public service, and the Constitution is the touchstone
APRIL 2012
2. Should there be an authority higher than the 4th Republican Constitution of Ghana?
ETHICS CONCEPT
Using the ethical lens, law can deviate from what is ethical
SITUATIONAL ETHICS
The law is the center of gravity in public service, and the Constitution is the touchstone
APRIL 2012
EGOISM
UTILITARIAN THEORY
APRIL 2012
3. Is a private contractor such as Anderson also bound by our response to the above?
PRINCIPLE OF JUSTICE
Individuals should be treated the same unless they differ in ways that are relevant to the situation in which they are involved.
APRIL 2012
4. Does our response change if that agenda is based on basic religious beliefs? Family loyalties? Policy preferences?
GENERAL UTILITARIANISM
APRIL 2012
5. The consequence if everyone acted as Anderson did? What would be the consequences for public policy? For public trust? For a government under law?
YES
PRINCIPLE OF XXXX Individuals should be treated the same unless they differ in ways that are relevant to the situation in which they are involved. Single-rule Nonconsequential Theories
APRIL 2012
GOLDEN RULE: If you want to be treated fairly, treat others fairly, if you want to be told the truth, tell others the truth, if you want your privacy 2012 EMBA GROUP respected, respect 6 the privacy of others.
1.
hghhflf;hhg
APRIL 2012
7.
Act in such a way that the action taken under the circumstances could be a universal law or rule of behaviour.
APRIL 2012
8.
1.
hghhflf;hhg
APRIL 2012
9.
xxx
xxx
xxx
xxx
xxx
APRIL 2012
10.
1.
hghhflf;hhg
APRIL 2012
CONCLUSION
1.
hghhflf;hhg
APRIL 2012
REFERENCES
1.
hghhflf;hhg
APRIL 2012
THANK YOU
1.
hghhflf;hhg
APRIL 2012
xxx xxx xxx xxx MARY BUCKNAR GODLY AGGREY SAMUEL FIIFI PRATT JOSEPH CIICI ARTHUR
GROUP 6 MEMBERS
APRIL 2012
APRIL 2012