Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
The SICC: Connecting Agencies, People & Ideas through Advising & Assisting
An Orientation to the Role of the SICC
Federal
State
5/11/2012
Not less than one member shall be from the agency responsible for the state Medicaid program; Not less that one member shall be a representative designated by the Office of Coordinator for Education of Homeless Children and Youths; Not less than one member shall be a representative from the state child welfare agency responsible for foster care; and Not less that one member shall be a representative from the state agency responsible for childrens mental health. The authority for the FICC at 644, IDEA 1997, was deleted.
[641(b)(1)(G), (K)-(M) and deletion of the FICC at 644, IDEA 1997]
5/11/2012 5
SICC Membership
In general.--The council shall be composed as follows:
Parents.--Not less than 20 percent of the members Service providers.--Not less than 20 percent of the members State legislature.--Not less than 1 member Personnel preparation.--Not less than 1 member Agency for early intervention services.--Not less than 1 member Agency for preschool services.--Not less than 1 State Medicaid agency.--Not less than 1 member Head start agency.--Not less than 1 member Child care agency.--Not less than 1 member Agency for health insurance.--Not less than 1 member Office of the coordinator of education of homeless children and youth.--Not less than 1 member State foster care representative.--Not less than 1 member Mental health agency.--Not less than 1 member Other members.--The council may include other members
5/11/2012 6
ICC Roles and Responsibilities: Advise and Assist the Lead Agency with certain functions
Advise and assist the Lead Agency in the development of policies Assist in achieving full participation, coordination, and cooperation of all appropriate private and public agencies Assist in the effective implementation of the statewide system, by establishing a process that includes:
Seeking information about any federal, state, or local policies that impede timely service delivery; Taking steps to ensure that any policy problems identified are resolved; To the extent appropriate, assisting the Lead Agency in the resolution of disputes.
5/11/2012
5/11/2012
LEAD AGENCIES NEED SICC SUPPORT AND PARTNERSHIP MORE THAN EVER
5/11/2012
5/11/2012
10
Identify the agency representatives to invite (in your state, is the a role of the SICC or of the Governor/Governors office?) Select the appropriate method for inviting agency representatives (who has been appointed and who will do the outreach to potential members?) Select the site and time for meetings (are they convenient?) Plan the agenda for the meeting (is there an executive committee or a steering committee to develop the agenda?)
For your SICC: Which of these are complete? Which remain? Which can this group accomplish? Which belong to someone else?
5/11/2012 11
5/11/2012
12
Meeting schedules Meeting locations Role and function Program specific concerns Isolated in positions No experience with group Insecure, take no risks No informal networking Council functions in name, not in practice Share information, not resources Suspicious of others Formal, get acquainted Focused on programs, no on shared children/families Cautious cooperation Learning about structure of other programs
Based on Foster, 1986, from Jo Shackelford's files
13
Personnel Limitations
Operating style
Stage 2: Coordination
Turnovers followed by smaller, more stable group New members have authority to commit resources First case reviews lead to focus on children and families, not programs Group organizes around child/family-specific issues Informal networking and teamwork develop, problems are defined differently Group risk-taking low, but developing, funds may be blended or braided Success in work leads to trust of group members and in the progress the council can make
5/11/2012
14
Stage 3: Collaboration
Further success leads to greater trust Council members learn to cut deals to make the system work Informal networking supplants formal structure for action Hidden leadership emerges, roles established, trust and deeper relationships formed Resources held in common, goal is optimal mix of services for programs/children/families using a game board strategy Tracking and case management emerge as essential parts of the coordination and accountability processes
5/11/2012
15
To suggest
To guide
To aid
your agency/family/
constituency group
5/11/2012 Adapted from J. Copenhaver 2006 17
Policy Approval
Get Plans/Policies Accepted and Adopted Endorsers of Part C policies Endorsers of policies/efforts of other childrens initiatives Part C grant administrators
Policy Implementation
Facilitate Smooth Operation of Service System Gatekeepers of policies as developed Monitors of interagency agreements
services
Policy Analysts Identify fiscal and other sources of support
Policy approvers
Seekers of support from other influential groups
Monitoring and
Program quality Consumer satisfaction Timely service delivery
5/11/2012
18
Policy Approval
Informing policy
Policy Implementation
Information gatherers re: status Service system coordination Part C grant administrators
approvers of need for and of service system value of policies Creators and
Policy Writers
Proposal readers/ project recommendations Developers of guidelines for service system
maintainers of climate
conductive to policy approval
5/11/2012
19
Policy Implementation
Funders of projects, studies, pilots and/or programs Obtainers of private funds for
existing programs
Data analysts of existing fiscal policies and procedures Stakeholders to provide input to Lead Agency
implementation
Assisting locals Evaluators of effectiveness of policies and programs Representatives of constituencies Ongoing planning and review
of service system
5/11/2012 Adapted from G. Harbin & J. Van Horn, 1990 20
5/11/2012
21
5/11/2012
22
Interagency Collaboration CAN be achieved through strong leadership and active member participation
5/11/2012
23
Develop People
Self-Reflect
5/11/2012 24
Why is interagency collaboration sometimes confusing or difficult? Sometimes because of differing goals and focus.
Community
Education Community
Goals
To enhance intellectual development; to enhance pre-school performance and social development
Focus
Pre-academics, school readiness.
Health Community
To reduce chronic illness; to enhance overall health; to reduce utilization of high-cost health resources.
Maximize sound neurological development; teach optimal nutritional and health habits. Parenting classes; home visiting.
To transform parent-child relationships; to improve emotional functioning; to reduce at-risk behaviors; to stop cycles of dysfunctional interactions
To enhance development in distinct domains; to reduce impact of disability; to foster education in inclusive settings.
5/11/2012
25
26
5/11/2012
Successful interagency coordination, cooperation, and collaboration requires a commitment to make it work and a willingness to try new ideas, to be creative, and to share
5/11/2012 28
5/11/2012
29
5/11/2012
J. Copenhaver, 2006
30
Structure is important
5/11/2012
31
SICC Committees
Committee Examples
Executive Membership Child Find/Public Awareness Personnel Development Advocacy Fiscal What committees do you currently have? And What committees do you believe your ICC needs?
5/11/2012 32
Consistent attendance/representation Equal partnership among all members Consistent leadership Well-defined goals Group cohesiveness Established meeting procedures and times Set agenda
5/11/2012 Adapted from Jo Shackelford's files 33
Areas of ICC involvement what are some activities your ICC might undertake?
Screening and
identification
Case management
Program evaluation
34
5/11/2012
The focus should always be on advising and assisting the Lead Agency. An additional current focus is
5/11/2012
35
SPP/APR
2010 2011 (July 20SPP = State Performance Plan
6 year plan, developed by each state in 2005, now continued through 2012
5/11/2012
36
C7 Timeliness of IFSP
C8 Early Childhood Transition (A, B, C)
5/11/2012
Needs assistance
Needs intervention
5/11/2012
40
Determinations
OSEP makes states determinations Announced in early summer States must make determinations of local programs, considering: Performance on compliance indicators; Whether data submitted by LEAs or EIS programs are valid, reliable, and timely; Uncorrected noncompliance from other sources; and Any audit findings.
5/11/2012 41
Accountability
Providers whose agencies receive Part C funds are responsible for implementing all IDEA requirements.
Compliance Indicators Results Indicators Related Requirements
5/11/2012
42
States Focus
Accountability Data systems, quality, validity, reliability Finance MOE (maintenance of effort) FAF (Federal Allocation Formula)/FMAP (Federal Medical Assistance Percentage) Reimbursement Insurance, Medicaid, Family Co-Pay, other sources ARRA funds (ending later in 2011) Quality services Evidence-based practices Family and provider satisfaction
5/11/2012 43
Additional resources:
NING Website for SICC Chairs, Members, and Staff http://tadnet.ning.com/group/siccchairsmembersandstaff State ICC Overview http://www.nectac.org/~pdfs/pubs/SICCoverview.pdf Interagency Coordination (Includes laws and Memorandums of Agreements)
http://www.nectac.org/topics/intercoord/intercoord.asp
OSEP Policy Letters of Clarification Related to Part C and Section 619 http://www.nectac.org/idea/clarfctnltrs.asp
5/11/2012
44
8:45-9:45
9:45-10:00 10:00-10:45 and 10:45 11:30
11:301:00
5/11/2012
3:00 3:15
3:15 4:00
5/11/2012
46
5/11/2012
47
5/11/2012
48