Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Outline
Terminology Types of errors Dealing with errors Quality assurance vs Testing Component Testing
Unit testing Integration testing
System testing
Function testing Structure Testing Performance testing Acceptance testing Installation testing
ch11lect1r2.ppt
Qualityoftodayssoftware.
y
Theaveragesoftwareproductreleasedonthemarketisnoterror free.
OOSE: ch11lect1r1.ppt
What is this?
ch11lect1r2.ppt
ch11lect1r2.ppt
Algorithmic Fault
ch11lect1r2.ppt
Mechanical Fault
ch11lect1r2.ppt
Terminology
Reliability: The measure of success with which the observed behavior of a system confirms to some specification of its behavior. Failure: Any deviation of the observed behavior from the specified behavior. Error: The system is in a state such that further processing by the system will lead to a failure. Fault (Bug): The mechanical or algorithmic cause of an error. There are many different types of errors and different ways how we can deal with them.
ch11lect1r2.ppt
ch11lect1r2.ppt
Verification?
ch11lect1r2.ppt
10
Modular Redundancy?
ch11lect1r2.ppt
11
ch11lect1r2.ppt
12
Patching?
ch11lect1r2.ppt
13
Testing?
ch11lect1r2.ppt
14
specification specification
Mismatch between what the Mismatch between what the client needs and what the client needs and what the server offers server offers Mismatch between Mismatch between requirements and requirements and implementation implementation
Algorithmic Faults Algorithmic Faults
Documentation does not Documentation does not match actual conditions or match actual conditions or operating procedures operating procedures
Errors Errors
Missing initialization Missing initialization Branching errors (too soon, Branching errors (too soon, too late) too late) Missing test for nil Missing test for nil
Stress or overload errors Stress or overload errors Capacity or boundary errors Capacity or boundary errors Timing errors Timing errors Throughput or performance Throughput or performance errors errors
ch11lect1r2.ppt
15
Verification:
Assumes hypothetical environment that does not match real environment Proof might be buggy (omits important constraints; simply wrong)
Modular redundancy:
Expensive
Patching
Slows down performance
ch11lect1r2.ppt
16
ch11lect1r2.ppt
17
Some Observations
Testing can only show the presence of bugs, not their absence (Dijkstra)
ch11lect1r2.ppt
18
Testing often viewed as dirty work. To develop an effective test, one must have:
Detailed understanding of the system Knowledge of the testing techniques Skill to apply these techniques in an effective and efficient manner
Programmer often stick to the data set that makes the program work
"Dont mess up my code!"
ch11lect1r2.ppt
19
Testing Activities
Subsystem Code Subsystem Code
Unit Test
Tested Subsystem
Unit Test
Tested Subsystem
User Manual
Integration Test
Integrated Subsystems
Functional Test
Functioning System
Tested Subsystem
Subsystem Code
Unit Test
All tests by developer All tests by developer
ch11lect1r2.ppt
20
User Environment
Test
Acceptance Test
Installation Test
Usable System
Tests by client Tests by client Tests by developer Tests by developer Users understanding
System in Use
Bernd Bruegge & Allen H. Dutoit OOSE:
21
Fault Avoidance
Fault Detection
Fault Tolerance
Atomic Transactions
Modular Redundancy
Debugging
Unit Testing
Integration Testing
System Testing
Correctness Debugging
Performance Debugging
ch11lect1r2.ppt
22
Verification
Configuration Management
Walkthrough
Inspection
Unit Testing
Integration Testing
Types of Testing
Unit Testing:
Individual subsystem Carried out by developers Goal: Confirm that subsystems is correctly coded and carries out the intended functionality
Integration Testing:
Groups of subsystems (collection of classes) and eventually the entire system Carried out by developers Goal: Test the interface among the subsystem
ch11lect1r2.ppt
24
System Testing
System Testing:
The entire system Carried out by developers Goal: Determine if the system meets the requirements (functional and global)
Acceptance Testing:
Evaluates the system delivered by developers Carried out by the client. May involve executing typical transactions on site on a trial basis Goal: Demonstrate that the system meets customer requirements and is ready to use
ch11lect1r2.ppt
25
Unit Testing
Informal:
Incremental coding
Static Analysis:
Hand execution: Reading the source code Walk-Through (informal presentation to others) Code Inspection (formal presentation to others) Automated Tools checking for syntactic and semantic errors departure from coding standards
Dynamic Analysis:
Black-box testing (Test the input/output behavior) White-box testing (Test the internal logic of the subsystem or object) Data-structure based testing (Data types determine test cases)
ch11lect1r2.ppt 26
Black-box Testing
Focus: I/O behavior. If for any given input, we can predict the output, then the module passes the test.
Almost always impossible to generate all possible inputs ("test cases")
ch11lect1r2.ppt
27
Input is valid if it is from a discrete set. Select test cases from 2 equivalence classes:
ch11lect1r2.ppt
28
White-box Testing
Focus: Thoroughness (Coverage). Every statement in the component is executed at least once. Four types of white-box testing
Statement Testing Loop Testing Path Testing Branch Testing
ch11lect1r2.ppt
29
Statement Testing (Algebraic Testing): Test single statements (Choice of operators in polynomials, etc) Loop Testing:
Cause execution of the loop to be skipped completely. (Exception: Repeat loops) Loop to be executed exactly once Loop to be executed more than once
Path testing:
Make sure all paths in the program are executed
Branch Testing (Conditional Testing): Make sure that each possible outcome from a condition is tested at least once
if ( i = TRUE) printf("YES\n");else printf("NO\n"); Test cases: 1) i = TRUE; 2) i = FALSE
Bernd Bruegge & Allen H. Dutoit OOSE:
ch11lect1r2.ppt
30
ch11lect1r2.ppt
31
8 9
32
7 T 8 Exit
Bernd Bruegge & Allen H. Dutoit OOSE:
F 9
ch11lect1r2.ppt
33
1 a (Covered by any data) 2 b (Data set must contain at least one value) 3 e (Negative score) 5 h (Reached if either 4 or g 5 is reached)
6 7
i Exit
ch11lect1r2.ppt
34
Test Cases
Test case 1 : ? (To execute loop exactly once) Test case 2 : ? (To skip loop body) Test case 3: ?,? (to execute loop more than once) These 3 test cases cover all control flow paths
ch11lect1r2.ppt
35
--float Sum = 0.0; int Num = 0; float Mean=0.0; float Score; read(fp, Score);
(! EOF(ScoreFile))?
F 5 else 7 if (NumberOfScores > 0) /* Compute mean; print result */ T Mean = (Sum/Num); 8 printf(Mean score: %f\n, Mean); else 9 F
--6 Read(fp, Score) Both of these are PASS exits (return True to caller)
RJLQ1: Why are there no FAIL exits? RJLQ2: Can you merge any states or call stmts?? * Modified for C: pre-condition: (fp = fopen(ScoreFile, read))
Bernd Bruegge & Allen H. Dutoit OOSE:
ch11lect1r2.ppt
36
--Action0*
(! EOF(ScoreFile))?
--F 3 (Score>0.0)? 4 F 5 T
On entry, test StateKs guard condition. If TRUE, execute ActionK Routine and, on a trigger event, go to the PASS-exit state. If FALSE, skip ActionK and go to the FAIL-exit state (now or on trigger?).
Action3
? 6
--Action?
Action7
--Action?
RegExpr: 012{3(4|5)62}*7(8|9) <2, 3, 7> => (1([4]6)*(8| Bernd Bruegge & Allen H. Dutoit OOSE: ch11lect1r2.ppt 9))
37
--F else 7 if (NumberOfScores > 0) /* Compute mean; print result */ 8: Mean = (Sum/Num); printf(Mean score: %f\n, Mean); F else ?
--9: printf (No scores found in file\n) RJLQ: Why are there no FAIL exits? * Pre-condition: (fp = fopen(ScoreFile, read))
Bernd Bruegge & Allen H. Dutoit OOSE:
ch11lect1r2.ppt
38
ch11lect1r2.ppt
39
ch11lect1r2.ppt
40
ch11lect1r2.ppt
41
ch11lect1r2.ppt
42
White-box Testing:
Potentially infinite number of paths have to be tested White-box testing often tests what is done, instead of what should be done Cannot detect missing use cases
Both types of testing are needed White-box testing and black box testing are the extreme ends of a testing continuum. Any choice of test case lies in between and depends on the following:
Number of possible logical paths Nature of input data Amount of computation Complexity of algorithms and data structures
Black-box Testing:
Potential combinatorial explosion of test cases (valid & invalid data) Often not clear whether the selected test cases uncover a particular error Does not discover extraneous use cases ("features")
Bernd Bruegge & Allen H. Dutoit OOSE:
ch11lect1r2.ppt
43
2. Decide how the testing is 2. Decide how the testing is done done
Code inspection Code inspection Proofs (Design by Contract) Proofs (Design by Contract) Black-box, white box, Black-box, white box, Select integration testing Select integration testing strategy (big bang, bottom strategy (big bang, bottom up, top down, sandwich) up, top down, sandwich)
ch11lect1r2.ppt
44
knowledge knowledge about functional about functional requirements (black-box requirements (black-box testing): testing):
Use cases Use cases Expected input data Expected input data Invalid input data Invalid input data
knowledge about knowledge about system structure, algorithms, system structure, algorithms, data structures (white-box data structures (white-box testing): testing):
Control structures Control structures
Test branches, loops, ... Test branches, loops, ... Test records fields, Test records fields, arrays, ... arrays, ...
Bernd Bruegge & Allen H. Dutoit OOSE:
ch11lect1r2.ppt
45
Unit-testing Heuristics
1. Create unit tests as soon as object 1. Create unit tests as soon as object design is completed: design is completed: Black-box test: Test the use Black-box test: Test the use cases & functional model cases & functional model White-box test: Test the White-box test: Test the dynamic model dynamic model Data-structure test: Test the Data-structure test: Test the object model object model 2. Develop the test cases 2. Develop the test cases Goal: Find the minimal Goal: Find the minimal number of test cases to cover number of test cases to cover as many paths as possible as many paths as possible 3. Cross-check the test cases to 3. Cross-check the test cases to eliminate duplicates eliminate duplicates Don't waste your time! Don't waste your time!
Bernd Bruegge & Allen H. Dutoit OOSE:
4. Desk check your source code 4. Desk check your source code Reduces testing time Reduces testing time 5. Create aatest harness 5. Create test harness Test drivers and test stubs are Test drivers and test stubs are needed for integration testing needed for integration testing 6. Describe the test oracle 6. Describe the test oracle Often the result of the first Often the result of the first successfully executed test successfully executed test 7. Execute the test cases 7. Execute the test cases Dont forget regression testing Dont forget regression testing Re-execute test cases every time Re-execute test cases every time aachange is made. change is made. 8. Compare the results of the test with the 8. Compare the results of the test with the test oracle test oracle Automate as much as possible Automate as much as possible
ch11lect1r2.ppt 46