Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Objectives
Present a case I saw Review select gastric cancer points Review the evidence behind our treatment decision Review our treatment decision and actual plan More to come in 2011-2012 symposia season
H&P
75 year old female with longstanding 2-3 year history of dyspepsia and chronic gastritis. The patient has been evaluated by several doctors in this time period who gave her proton pump inhibitors with some relief. The patient chose not to follow-up because of her symptom relief. 2/2010 the patient had an EGD which appreciated an ulcer in the body of the stomach, we do not have records of a biopsy at that time but the patient was told to follow-up. She did not followup because her symptoms improved. Since then, her symptoms have gotten worse, including abdominal discomfort, no pain, and no appetite. Recently over the last year has developed decreasing appetite and a 30-50 pound weight
PMHx: HTN, gastritis PSurgHx: None Medications: Protonix SHx: No Tob, No EtOH, lives at home with family, 6 children FamHx: negative
Exam
KPS 80, VSS, Afebrile General: Alert&Oriented x3, No Acute Distress HEENT: NCAT, Oral cavity clear, no palpable masses Lymph Nodes: No palpale Lymphadenopathy Cardiovascular: Regular rate and rhythm Respiratory: Clear to Auscultation Bilaterally Abdomen: Soft, nontender, nindistended no organomegaly 8 cm healing vertical incision with staples in place, no evidence of bleeding. Neurologic: CNs II-XII intact, nonfocal motor/sensory exam Musculoskeletal: No bone tenderness to palpation
Work-up
Blood work EGD CT abd/pelvis
Upper Endoscopy
The patient was evaluated by EGD on and an ulcer was found in the lesser curvature of the stomach in the body.
Biopsy
Duodenum, biopsy: Small intestinal mucosa with normal villous architecture. Intraepithelial lymphocytes are not increased. Negative for celiac disease or parasites. B. Lesion, body, stomach, biopsy: Adenocarcinoma, moderately differentiated. Chronic gastritis, severe. No H. pylori identified by immunohistochemistry.
Specimen labeled" distal stomach", subtotal gastrectomy Specimen Type- stomach Procedure- subtotal gastrectomy Tumor Site- lesser curvature Tumor Size- 3.5 CM Histologic Tumor Type (WHO)adenocarcinoma, intestinal type Histologic Grade- moderately differentiated Local Invasion (microscopic extent)- subserosa (T3) Lympho-Vascular Invasionpresent Perineurial Invasion- present Surgical Margins- negative Proximal margin- 4 cm
Surgery
Distance of invasive carcinoma from nearest margin- omental margin, 3.5 cm In Situ Carcinoma (for cases also having an invasive component)- present Polyps (away from the carcinoma)- not present Non-neoplastic StomachIntestinal metaplasia. Chronic gastritis. Helicobacter Organisms- not present Lymph NodesMetastatic carcinoma in five out of 24 lymph nodes ( 5/24). Specimen labeled" proximal stomach for margin" : Chronic gastritis with reactive lymphoid aggregate, no tumor seen. Specimen labeled" lesser omentum" : Unremarkable fibroadipose tissue, no tumor seen. Two benign lymph nodes (0/2).
Assessment
75 yo F with stage IIIA (T3N2M0) gastric CA s/p subtotal gastrectomy now referred for adjuvant therapy
Plan
Patient given 1 cycle of 5FU/leucovorin and scheduled for concurrent chemo-RT, with chemo given on week 1 and 5, followed by 2 additional cycles of 5FU/leucovorin RT to be given via IMRT: 5040 (4500) cGy/180 cGy fractions
Anatomy
Stomach: The alimentary reservoir for mixing and enzymatic digestion of food
Cardia: Surrounds the esophageal orifice into stomach; lesser and greater curvature meet here Fundus: Most cephalic part of stomach; touches left hemidiaphragm Body: Main portion; principal site of acid production Antrum: Vestibule; pre-pyloric part of stomach Pylorus: Sphincter opening into duodenum; formed by thickened middle layer of smooth muscle and a thin fibrous septum
Mural anatomy Wall consists of 3 layers of smooth muscle (outermost = longitudinal; middle = circular; inner = oblique); circular is thickest Gastric folds (rugae): Redundant folds of the gastric mucosal surface Layers (inside out): mucosa, submucosa, muscularis externa, serosa Mucosa is columnar epithelium Gastric glands: Vary in prevalence in different parts of the stomach; produce mucous (which lines and protects gastric surface), pepsinogen (precursor to pepsin), and hydrochloric acid (activates digestive enzymes, assists with breakdown of food)
Anatomy
Location: Most commonly antrum/distal stomach (40%), followed by proximal stomach or GE junction (35%), then body (25%). The incidence of proximal lesions has increased (used to be the least common site). Patterns of spread
Lymph node drainage is to nodes along the greater and lesser curvatures (gastroepiploic and gastric nodes respectively), to the celiac axis (includes porta hepatis, splenic, suprapancreatic, pancreaticoduodenal LN), paraaortics, distal paraesophageal. left gastric LNs (largest drainage) - from lesser curvature gastro-epiploic LNs - from greater curvature right gastric LNs - from pyloris
Epidemiology
In 2010: 21,000 cases and 10,570 deaths in US (NCI). Incidence in men is 8.4 per 100,000 in North America. Sharp decrease in incidence in Western countries over the past 60 years (by a factor of about 5). (However, incidence of GE junction and proximal gastric tumors is increasing.) More common in men by 1.5 to 1. Third most common cancer in the world and 2nd leading cause of cancer deaths. Common in Japan (78 per 100,000 men), China, other East Asian countries, Eastern Europe and South America. Risk factors:
smoked and salted food, low fruit/vegetable intake, low socioeconomic status, pernicious anemia (5-10% patients develop gastric ca.). H.pylori infection (3-6X risk), confined to distal cancers and intestinal type malignancy) No increased risk found with gastric ulcers. 2nd generation Japanese have similar risk factor to general U.S. population and not Japanese population
RT technique: 45 Gy to tumor bed, regional nodes, 2 cm beyond proximal and distal margins of resection. Defined tumor bed by pre-op CT. Lymph nodes included were: perigastric, celiac, local para-aortic, splenic, hepatoduodenal or hepatic-portal, and pancreaticoduodenal. Exclusion of the splenic nodes was allowed in patients with antral lesions if it was necessary to spare the left kidney. For tumors of GE junction, included paracardial and paraesophageal lymph nodes.
INT 0116
2001 "Chemoradiotherapy after surgery compared with surgery alone for adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction." (MacDonald JS, N Engl J Med. 2001 Sep 6;345(10):72530.)
Median F/U 5 years
Outcome:
Median survival observation 2.2 years vs chemo-RT 3.0 year (SS, HR for death 1.35). 3-year OS 41% vs 50%. 3-year RFS 31% vs 48%, median 19 months vs 30 months (SS, HR for relapse 1.52). LR 29% vs 19%, regional relapse 72% vs 65% (largely abdominal carcinomatosis), DM higher 18% vs 33%. Regional failure included peritoneal spread or liver mets.
Toxicity: Grade 3+ hematologic 54%, GI 33%. 17% stopped treatment due to toxic effects. 32% of pts in chemo/RT group experienced grade 4 toxic effects; 1% had treatment-related deaths. Conclusion: Postop chemo-RT should be considered for patients at high risk for recurrence after curative resection
After R0 resection, patients with Tis or T1, N0 or T2, N0 tumors may be observed w/ low risk features (well diff, no PNI, no LVI, age >50)
Induction: 2 cycles. PCF - 5-FU(by continuous infusion, 24/hr x days 1-5,29-33), cisplatin(days 1-5,29-33), taxol(24-hr infusion, days 1,29). PC cisplatin(days 1,29), taxol(days 1,29) Concurrent: PCF - 5-FU(continuous infusion x 5 days,weekly), taxol(weekly). PC cisplatin(weekly), taxol(continuous infusion x 5 days,weekly).
2009-- "Randomized Phase II Trial Evaluating Two Paclitaxel and CisplatinContaining Chemoradiation Regimens As Adjuvant Therapy in Resected Gastric Cancer (RTOG0114)" (Schwartz GK, J Clin Oncol. 2009 Apr 20;27(12):1956-62.) Closed at interim analysis (with 22 pts entered on PCF arm) due to increased toxicity. Accrual continued on PC arm. Grade 3+ GI toxicity 59% in PCF arm (significantly worse than in INT0116). Median DFS 14.6 mo (PCF), Median DFS not reached in PC arm; 2-yr DFS 52% (PC). Conclusion: Although PC appears safe, the DFS failed to exceed the target goal (set by INT0116) and cannot be recommended.
RT Technique
Conventional Treatment
Our Technique
External Beam RT given via IMRT technique PTV encompassed: Gastric remnant, perigastric, suprapancreatic, celiac, splenic hilar, porta hepatic, and pancreaticoduodenal lymph nodes