Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
SUB-REGIONS
Asia
Indian Ocean
Pacific Ocean
Oceania
Passage between Indian and Pacific oceans. SLOC to Australian east coast and New Zealand
EXCEPTIONALISM
USA; Global hegemonic power, balancing costs of maintaining the Global Commons, with ability to influence State to State relations. China; Communist Billion Citizen State, seeking to rise pacifically. India; Most populous democracy, seeking to ensure continued Indian Ocean dominance, and influence within the Asia land mass. Japan; forced demilitarisation, economic power projection, civil institutions with monopoly on use of force within Japanese jurisdiction.
ARTICLES REVIEWED
Cooperation from Strength The United States, China and the South China Sea
January 2012, Edited by Patrick M. Cronin Contributors, Patrick M Cronin, Peter A Dutton, M Taylor Fravel, James R Holmes, Robert D Kaplan, Will Rogers, and Ian Storey
Growing Chinese pre-eminence Japan seeking to normalise as a nation India looking east, seeking a more active role in AsiaPacific ASEAN; increasingly institutionalised, driving regional cooperation Near term security issues
Korean Peninsula tensions China-Taiwan tensions
Continued importance of existing USA-Bilateral security arrangements Geopolitical Considerations Regional geographical considerations
History as a record of Chinese geostrategic centrality in Asia 150 Years of political upheaval after Millennia of Chinese rule Chinese claims over South China Sea can be understood as a Greater Caribbean moment
Constructivism anyone?
Nations surrounding China, economically engaged and hedging USA as an offshore balancer
US Chinese conflict not a favourable option for risk averse minor nations: Australia, NZ, Papua, Indonesia. Produces bias against any China-US conflict. [Z} Australian Defence Budget as an indicator
Submarines as the ultimate maritime presence Aerial surveillance and the age drones Air lift and emergency response
China rebuffs attempts to move the South China Sea disputes from regional to global forums Great power behaviour evident in Chinese moves to bilateral agreements, versus multilateral engagement
Does USA movement to multilateral engagement signal a abdication of their Great Power status? Limits of Realism in an Institutionalised power structure?
UNCLOS and other Customary International Laws tend to limit Great Power influence.
Theoretical tangent: Is this an example of a self destructive tendency in Great Power behaviour? Self enforcing natural laws?
Multiple state claimants over territory is a feature of geostrategic reality in the south China sea. US maritime predominance necessary. US Neutrality in Regional Dynamics Chinese Maritime realities ASEAN and Littoral Regions Conflict avoidance to balance policy for US foreign diplomacy
History of Chinese sovereign claim. Chinese claims not supported by UNCLOS Maritime Resources
Sea Lane Security Chinese policy of reassurance, and bilateral agreements between claimants
Other claimants prefer multilateral approach to balance Chinese influence Failure of the 2002 DoC; further talks China will continue blocking moves for arbitration and 3rd party intervention China will continue asserting effective control over the South China Sea in pursuit of its sovereign claims
China asserting interests in ways which threaten the normative global maritime commons China seeking to Shape CIL through State behaviour Challenges to established positions of UNCLOS Three pillars of Modern Globalisation
Open, Market based access to resources and trade International Institutions fostering stability Stability in the Global Commons
Enshrined in UN Charter
Constabulary role of Navies Multiple forms of State maritime jurisdiction Chinese anti-access policy towards SCS Regional Baselines
Boundaries at or near the shoreline between a coastal states fully sovereign territory and the maritime zones that extend seaward.
China is seeking to change the rules and norms that define maritime rights US and allies should act against this change US should ratify UNCLOS
Natural Resources
The Challenge of Climate Change Dynamic interaction between Land and Maritime resources Promoting regional stability
US Maritime Strategy
Multinational trusteeship (Multipolarity) would be a new phenomenon Dual nature of Navies makes it difficult to distinguish between Competitive and Cooperative State behaviours The China Factor
Chinese policy assertions of indisputable sovereignty over SCS islands and waters Failure of DOC Reactions to CARAT
Globalised economy relies of free flow of goods Southeast Asian states have territorial claims at stake Beijing view of vital interest against coalitions Washing should work bilaterally to uphold maritime security
Future 1: US Primacy Future 2: An Asian Balance of Powers Future 3: Concert of Powers Future 4: Chinese Primacy Shocks
ZORBAS THOUGHTS
Domestic constructivism
Uncertainties arising from domestic politics Model Theories.
http://www.marinetraffic.com/ais/
ZORBA THOUGHTS
Answer to increased traffic through Chinese waters, the enforcement agency grew. This has led China to effect control of East and South China Seas.
Nuclear capabilities on Hainan Island lead to a South China Sea predominance. China continues to assert rights in these matters. Arbitration as an answer? Not likely, international laws currently favour the Chinese opposition. China has a negative bias in acceding to any international arbitration. Assertions of Exceptionalism.
KOREAN PENINSULA