November 2009

doc.: IEEE 802.15-09-0765-00-0006

Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks
Submission Title: [Samsung-ETRI-CUNY-KETI-KORPA-Inha Merged Baseline Proposal for TG6]

Date Submitted: [16th November, 2009] Source: [HyungSoo Lee, Jaehwan Kim, Jeong-Yeol Oh, Cheolhyo Lee, Jae-Young Kim, Mi-kyung Oh, Sungweon Kang, Jung-hwan Hwang, Hyung-il Park, Tae-young Kang, Chang-sub Shin, Seong-soon Joo]1, [Ranjeet K. Patro, Ashutosh Bhatia, Arun Naniyat, Thenmozhi Arunan, Giriraj Goyal, Kiran Bynam, Seung-Hoon Park, NohGyoung Kang, Chihong Cho, Euntae Won, Youngkwon Cho, Sridhar Rajagopal, Farooq Khan, Eui-Jik Kim, Jeongsik In, Yongsuk Park, Chul-Jin Kim, Jahng Sun Park, Sangyun Hwang, JongRim- Lee, Kiuk Kim, SeokYong-Lee, Hyunkuk Choi, Sung-Min Kim, Seong-Jun Song, Long Yan, Chang-Ryong Heo, Saerome Kim]2, [J.S Yoon, Gahng S. Ahn, Myung J Lee]3, [Dong-Sun Kim, Tae-Ho Hwang, Young-Hwan Kim, Jae-Gi Son, Seung-Ok Lim, Ha-Joong Chung, Chang-Won Park]4, [Yangmoon Yoon, Moon Young Choi, Sang Yun Lee]5, [Kyung-Sup Kwak, Sana Ullah, M. A. Ameen, Jae Ho Hwang, Jae Moung Kim, Jingwei Liu]6 Company: [ETRI]1, [Samsung Electronics]2, [CUNY]3, [KETI]4, [KORPA]5, [Inha Univ.]6
(1){138 Gajeong-ro, Yuseong-gu, Deajeon, 305-700, South Korea} {+82-42-860-5625}{ hsulee@etri.re.kr } (2){416, Maetan-3dong, Yeongtong-gu, Suwon-si, Gyeonggi-do, 443-742, South Korea}{+82-31-279-4960}{ etwon@samsung.com } (3){140th St. and Convent Ave, New York, NY, USA} {+1-212-650-7180}{ lee@ccny.cuny.edu } (4){#68 Yatap-dong Bundang-gu, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do 463-816, South Korea}{+82-31-789-7384}{ dskim@keti.re.kr } (5){78 Garak-dong, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 138-803, South Korea}{+82-31-450-1947}{ yoon001@paran.com } (6){253 Yonghyun-dong, Nam-gu, Incheon, 402-751, South Korea}{+82-32-860-9188}{ kskwak@inha.ac.kr }

Contact: Ranjeet K. Patro (MAC), (Jaehwan Kim, Dong-Sun Kim (NB)), Kiran Bynam (UWB), Jahng Sun Park (EFC) Abstract: [Describes the Samsung-ETRI-CUNY-KETI-KORPA-Inha merged baseline for TG6] Purpose: To invite other parties to join the group and create the TG6 baseline Notice: This document has been prepared to assist the IEEE P802.15. It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not
binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein.

Release: The contributor acknowledges and accepts that this contribution becomes the property of IEEE and may be made publicly available by P802.15.
Submission Slide 1

November 2009

doc.: IEEE 802.15-09-0765-00-0006

Samsung-ETRI-CUNY-KETI-KORPA-Inha

Baseline

Submission

Slide 2

November 2009

doc.: IEEE 802.15-09-0765-00-0006

Contributors

ETRI : HyungSoo Lee, Jaehwan Kim, Jeong-Yeol Oh, Cheolhyo Lee, Jae-Young Kim, Mi-kyung Oh, Sung-weon Kang, Jung-hwan Hwang, Hyung-il Park, Tae-young Kang, Chang-sub Shin, Seong-soon Joo Samsung : Ranjeet K. Patro, Ashutosh Bhatia, Arun Naniyat, Thenmozhi Arunan, Giriraj Goyal, Kiran Bynam, Seung-Hoon Park, Noh-Gyoung Kang, Chihong Cho, Euntae Won, Youngkwon Cho, Sridhar Rajagopal, Farooq Khan, Eui-Jik Kim, Jeongsik In, Yongsuk Park, Chul-Jin Kim, Jahng Sun Park, Sangyun Hwang, JongRim- Lee, Kiuk Kim, SeokYong-Lee, Hyunkuk Choi, Sung-Min Kim, Seong-Jun Song, Long Yan, Chang-Ryong Heo, Saerome Kim CUNY : J.S Yoon, Gahng S. Ahn, Myung J Lee KETI : Dong-Sun Kim, Tae-Ho Hwang, Young-Hwan Kim, Jae-Gi Son, Seung-Ok Lim, Ha-Joong Chung, Chang-Won Park KORPA: Yangmoon Yoon, Moon Young Choi, Sang Yun Lee Inha Univ. : Kyung-Sup Kwak, Sana Ullah, M.A.Ameen, Jae Ho Hwang, Jae Moung Kim, Jingwei Liu

Submission

Slide 3

November 2009

doc.: IEEE 802.15-09-0765-00-0006

PHYs and MAC Outline

MAC

Superframe structure mode

TDMA access, poll access & contention access

No Superframe structure mode

Poll access & contention access

NB PHY

UWB PHY

EFC PHY

Mandatory GFSK ~1Mbps

Mandatory PPM/BC-GPPM Non-coherent 250kbps~10Mbps Optional Differential coherent DPSK(Differential Phase Shift Keying) 1Mbps~10Mbps

Optional high data rate Only for in-body PSSK 10Mbps~20Mbps

Orthogonal code + FSC Preamble repetition Pilot sequence

Submission

Slide 4

November 2009

doc.: IEEE 802.15-09-0765-00-0006

MAC Baseline

Submission

Slide 5

November 2009

doc.: IEEE 802.15-09-0765-00-0006

Introduction

The merged MAC proposal targets all BAN applications and meets all TG6 functional requirements. The coordinator can operate in either of the two modes
Superframe structure mode

TDMA access period (TAP): Scheduled TDMA access Poll access period (PAP): Scheduled Poll access Contention access period (CAP) Unscheduled Poll access Contention access

No Superframe structure mode

Submission

Slide 6

November 2009

doc.: IEEE 802.15-09-0765-00-0006

Superframe structure mode

B1 TAP
fixed period

B2 PAP
variable period

B1 CAP
variable period

SD

SD = TAP + PAP + CAP

The format of the Superframe is defined by the coordinator. A Superframe consists of three periods.
Contention Access Period (CAP) : mandatory TDMA Access Period (TAP) : optional Poll Access Period (PAP) : optional

The duration of TAP is fixed over subsequent Superframes. The duration of PAP and CAP may vary over subsequent frames, but always, PAP+CAP = SD TAP.

Submission

Slide 7

November 2009

doc.: IEEE 802.15-09-0765-00-0006

Superframe structure mode

B1 TAP
fixed period

B2 PAP
variable period

B1 CAP
variable period

SD

SD = TAP + PAP + CAP

Two broadcast messages B1 and B2 are transmitted to manage network connection, device association, resource reservation, Superframe description etc. B1 defines the duration of TAP and SD. It also defines the slot structure in TAP and responsible for clock synchronization of TAP devices. B2 defines the length of the CAP and used for device association and resource reservation. B2 messages are sent without using the contention access. Optionally, the Superframe can have an Inactive Period (IP). Then, SD = TAP+PAP+CAP+IP. During the Inactive Period, the coordinator may enter a sleep mode.
Slide 8

Submission

November 2009

doc.: IEEE 802.15-09-0765-00-0006

No Superframe Structure Mode

Broadcast Poll message Wakeup message

Coordinator does not define Superframe structure to coordinate and manage device access Device transmit data frames using Unscheduled Poll access
Suitable and preferred when data transfer of only few implant devices are required Suitable for meeting the delay and jitter requirements of multimedia streaming traffic

Device can transmit data frames with Contention Access as well The coordinator may occasionally transmit a Wakeup/Broadcast poll message.
A wakeup message is sent to wakeup the implant device(s) to start a data session Broadcast Poll message is used for device connection and network formation. Contention resolution mechanism to avoid collision

Submission

Slide 9

November 2009

doc.: IEEE 802.15-09-0765-00-0006

Supporting Mechanisms

Emergency handling
Emergency message must be serviced regardless of coordinator state, by emergency channel access, or etc.

Wakeup mechanism
In-band wakeup

Association & network management

Group association

Coexistence mechanism
Coordinator can choose proper coexistence mechanism among optional methods

Reliability
FEC, ARQ or etc. can be supported, when required

Security

Submission

Slide 10

November 2009

doc.: IEEE 802.15-09-0765-00-0006

NB PHY Baseline

Submission

Slide 11

November 2009

doc.: IEEE 802.15-09-0765-00-0006

Presentation Outline

NB PHY Baseline Supported Frequency Bands GFSK Modulation as Mandatory PSSK Modulation as Optional In-body High Data Rate

Submission

Slide 12

November 2009

doc.: IEEE 802.15-09-0765-00-0006

NB PHY Baseline

Frequency bands
288-322 MHz MedRadio, MICS, WMTS and ISM band

Modulations
Mandatory

Data rates < 1Mbps GFSK Data rates 10 Mbps PSSK

Optional high data rates for only in-body service

Submission

Slide 13

November 2009

doc.: IEEE 802.15-09-0765-00-0006

Supported Frequency Bands

Freq. High data rate 288-322 MHz 401-402 MHz, 405-406 MHz 402-405 MHz 433.5-434.5 MHz Low data rate 868-928 MHz 902-928 MHz 2400-2483.5 608-614 MHz Bandwidth 13.3 MHz 100 KHz 300 KHz NA 500 KHz 500 KHz 500 KHz 1.5 MHz Emission limit 200 uV/m@3m 9.1 mV/m@3m 9.1 mV/m@3m -14.4 dBm +30 dBm +30 dBm +30 dBm 10.8 dBm ISM Unlicensed low-power MedRadio MICS (LBT)*

1395-1400 MHz
1427-1432 MHz
Submission

NA
NA
Slide 14

22.2 dBm
22.2 dBm

WMTS

November 2009

doc.: IEEE 802.15-09-0765-00-0006

GFSK Modulation as Mandatory

Power efficient GFSK Modulation as mandatory Band limited Gaussian pulse shape filter
Improve spectrum efficiency at the cost of increased ISI

FEC with GFSK

Header : 16bytes, BCH(128,120) Data: variable block length (Max. block FEC: BCH(256,248))

Frequency Band MedRadio MICS ISM WMTS

Channel /BW 10~15

(200 KHz ~ 1.5 MHz/CH)

Data rate 120 Kbps / 180 Kbps / 300 Kbps / 500 Kbps / 1 Mbps

Modulation

FEC Header:
BCH(128,120)

Pulse Shape Filter Gaussian Filter (Modulation index = 0.5, BT = 0.5)

GFSK

Data:
BCH(256,248)

Submission

Slide 15

November 2009

doc.: IEEE 802.15-09-0765-00-0006

PSSK Modulation as Optional In-body High Data Rate

Power and bandwidth efficient PSSK Modulation 8 PSSK

Lower Complexity/Low Power/High Performance Solution

Improvement Back-off characteristic for Non-linearity Analog Devices Simple differential receiving architecture is possible for the non-coherent detection Possible to share Tx/Rx common architecture with M-PSK or (M-DPSK)

Square-root raised cosine filter Any FEC scheme Is available to enhance the performance
Freq. Band [MHz] 288 322 Modulation 8-PSSK Symbol Rate [Msps] Pulse Shape Bandwidth [MHz] Data Rate [Mbps]

3.84
7.68

SRRC
SRRC

15.36
30.72

11.52
23.04

Submission

Slide 16

November 2009

doc.: IEEE 802.15-09-0765-00-0006

UWB PHY Baseline

Submission

Slide 17

November 2009

doc.: IEEE 802.15-09-0765-00-0006

Presentation Outline

UWB PHY Baseline UWB PHY Features

Submission

Slide 18

November 2009

doc.: IEEE 802.15-09-0765-00-0006

UWB PHY Baseline

Non-coherent BC-GPPM transceivers as mandatory
Low power system Independent of pulse shape like chaotic , Impulse radio, chirp Data rates: 250kbps~10Mbps

Differential coherent (DBPSK) system as optional

Reliable system design with relatively low power Pulse shapes like chaotic, chirp can be used Data rates: 1Mbps~10Mbps

Kasami sequences as common preamble Band plan

Band of 7.25 to 8.5 GHz as mandatory for global compliance Other bands of UWB as optional
Submission Slide 19

November 2009

doc.: IEEE 802.15-09-0765-00-0006

UWB PHY Features

Non-coherent transceivers Efficiently duty cycled Power efficient system design PER of 10 % at 3 m range at mandatory data rates for all channel models Good CCI(Co-Channel Interference) rejection Scalable data rates from few kbps to 10 Mbps Differentially coherent system for high reliability/ high data rate applications

Submission

Slide 20

November 2009

doc.: IEEE 802.15-09-0765-00-0006

EFC PHY Baseline

Submission

Slide 21

November 2009

doc.: IEEE 802.15-09-0765-00-0006

Presentation Outline

Electric Field Communication EFC PHY Baseline Signal Generation Rate Indicator

Submission

Slide 22

November 2009

doc.: IEEE 802.15-09-0765-00-0006

Electric Field Communication

With EFC, data transmitted by inducing electric-field and capacitive coupling on dielectric material
Human body has about 300~500 times better permittivity than air

Direct Digital Signaling FSDT (Frequency Selective Digital Transmission)

Quick and easy connection; Intuitive service with privacy & security No Antenna, less complex, and extremely low power Perfect candidate for HBC PHY
EFC Transmitter Dielectric Material
(e.g., Air, Water, Body)

EFC Receiver

Mobile Device EFC

Mobile Device

E-Field

EFC

Electrode

Electrode

Submission

November 2009

doc.: IEEE 802.15-09-0765-00-0006

EFC PHY Baseline

Data Modulation
FS-Spreader (Orthogonal Code + FSC)

Scalable Data rate: Up to 10 Mbps Preamble

128-bit Gold sequence FSC Repeated 4 times for better performance

SFD
(128-bit Gold sequence + Time offset) FSC

Rate Indicator (RI) using SFD field + Time offset

PHY header and PDSU transmitted at the same data rate Provides throughput efficiency, especially for high data rates Also supports traditional data rate field in PHY header option
FS : Frequency Selective FSC : Frequency Shift Code

Submission

Slide 24

November 2009

doc.: IEEE 802.15-09-0765-00-0006

Data Signal Generation

PHY Header/PSDU Generation

1 symbol : 16-bit FSC FSC: Repeated [0 1 ] & SF = 4

Operation freq. = fCK

Signal bandwidth depends on data rate (C), symbol conversion rate (1/N), and the length of orthogonal code (2L)
FS-Spreader (C/N)
Symbol Rate Orthogonal Coding (Walsh Modulation) r0 r1 r2

(C)
Data Rate

S2P convertor

(C2L)/N
XOR

Chip Rate FSC (fCK )

fCK cps

r15

Submission

November 2009

doc.: IEEE 802.15-09-0765-00-0006

Rate Indicator

RI uses SFD to indicate data rate: 7 classes

Both PHY header and PDSU transmitted at the same data rate Provides throughput efficiency, especially for high data rates May also use the traditional method using Data Rate Field (DRF) in PHY header One method selected during initial handshaking of two devices Master device selects the desired method During initial handshaking, DRF method is used to indicate the data rate

Preamble

SFD/RI

Header

PSDU

DRF RI Data Rate 000 001 010 011 100 101 110 111

Data Rate 125kbps 250kbps 500kbps 1Mbps 2Mbps Reserved Reserved Reserved
in PHY Header

T1 T2

T7

Toffset1
SFD/RI
Toffset1
Toffset2 SFD_Code SFD_Code garbage

125kbps
250kbps 500kbps 1Mbps 2Mbps

Toffset2 Toffset3 Toffset4 Toffset5

SFD code

Toffset7
Toffset

SFD_Code

Toffset6
Toffset7

Reserved
Reserved

Submission

November 2009

doc.: IEEE 802.15-09-0765-00-0006

References for Merged Baseline

Samsung-ETRI's EFC Proposal for HBC PHY - Documentation, Samsung-ETRI, Proposal to IEEE Standard Working Groups, IEEE 802.15-09-0748-00-0006 Cheolhyo Lee, Frequency band for in-body High Data Rate communication, ETRI, Contribution to IEEE Standard Working Groups, IEEE 802.15-09-0699-00-0006 Samsung/ETRI's EFC: HBC PHY proposal], Samsung-ETRI, Proposal to IEEE Standard Working Groups, IEEE 802.15-09-0689-00-0006 Narrowband PHY and MAC Revision for WBAN - Summary, KETI-LG-KORPA-TensorcomMERL, Proposal to IEEE Standard Working Groups, IEEE 802.15-09-0573-00-0006 HBC PHY & MAC, Samsung-ETRI-CNU, Proposal to IEEE Standard Working Groups, IEEE 802.15-09-0548-00-0006 MICS Band PHY Solution for WBAN, Inha Univ., Proposal to IEEE Standard Working Groups, IEEE 802.15-09-0367-01-0006 A Traffic-based Secure MAC Protocol for WBAN with Bridging Function, Inha Univ., Proposal to IEEE Standard Working Groups, IEEE 802.15-09-0366-01-0006 ETRI HBC PHY Proposal for BAN, ETRI, Proposal to IEEE Standard Working Groups, IEEE 802.15-09-0348-01-0006
MAC for IEEE802.15.6, ETRI-CNU, Proposal to IEEE Standard Working Groups, IEEE 802.15-09-0347-01-0006

Samsung MAC proposal for IEEE 802.15 TG6 Body Area Networks, Samsung, Proposal to IEEE Standard Working Groups, IEEE 802.15-09-0344-03-0006 Versatile MAC for Body Area Network, CUNY, Proposal to IEEE Standard Working Groups, IEEE 802.15-09-0337-00-0006

Submission

Slide 27

November 2009

doc.: IEEE 802.15-09-0765-00-0006

References for Merged Baseline

Versatile MAC for Body Area Network Update for UWB PHY, CUNY, Proposal to IEEE Standard Working Groups, IEEE 802.15-09-0336-03-0006
ETRI + Samsung Physical layer proposal, Samsung-ETRI, Proposal to IEEE Standard Working Groups, IEEE 802.15-09-0323-01-0006 Kiran Bynam, ETRI & Samsung PHY proposal to 802.15.6, Samsung-ETRI, Proposal to IEEE Standard Working Groups, IEEE 802.15-09-0322-01-0006 Distributed TDMA Scheduling for SOP, Samsung, Proposal to IEEE Standard Working Groups, IEEE 802.15-09-0321-01-0006 Samsung & ETRIs EFC PHY & MAC proposal, Samsung, Proposal to IEEE Standard Working Groups, IEEE 802.15-09-0318-02-0006 Block based PHY and Packet Transmission for Low Data Rate In-body WBAN, KETI-KORPA-LG-Jeju Univ-Casuh, Proposal to IEEE Standard Working Groups, IEEE 802.15-09-0317-04-0006 802.15.6 MAC Partial Proposal : Distributed TDMA Scheduling for SOP, Samsung, Proposal to IEEE Standard Working Groups, IEEE 802.15-09-0316-00-0006 Samsung MAC proposal Part 1: A power efficient MAC for BAN, Samsung, Proposal to IEEE Standard Working Groups, IEEE 802.15-09-0315-01-0006 Samsung MAC proposal Part 2: Co-existence, network management, security, Samsung, Proposal to IEEE Standard Working Groups, IEEE 802.15-09-0314-01-0006 Jaehwan Kim, ETRIs Proposal for In-body high data rate WBAN PHY, ETRI, Proposal to IEEE Standard Working Groups, IEEE 802.15-09-0179-04-0006 Samsungs preliminary PHY proposal to 802.15.6, Company, Proposal to IEEE Standard Working Groups, IEEE 802.15-09-0171-04-0006 Preliminary WBAN proposal using IR-UWB, Company, Proposal to IEEE Standard Working Groups, IEEE 802.15-09-0141-00-0006
Slide 28

Submission

November 2009

doc.: IEEE 802.15-09-0765-00-0006

Q&A

Submission

Slide 29