Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Introduction and Definition of PRA Origin of PRA Principles shared by PRA and RRA Exclusive principles of PRA What it is? Definition Principle Components Precepts of PRA Evolution in Details Whats in it? Where it is Applied? Practical Example Criticism Bibliography
Components: People Knowledge Participation Planning Action It is a combination of different approaches to Share Enhance Analyze Plan Act For the betterment of the rural people with their participation The secrets behind the success of PRA are Decentralization Empowerment
PRA: Origin
PRA has been evolved from RRA (Rapid Rural Appraisal) In mid 80s the necessity of participation in rural
development became evident and the term PRA was born The understanding of PRA came mostly from field rather than academia PRA mostly focuses on the empowerment of people through participation The sustainability rate of PRA is high due to the participation of the local people The sense of ownership and belongingness helps to the success of PRA
Optimizing tradeoffs
Understanding the usefulness of information
Triangulating
Crosschecking and approximation
and confidence building Self critical awareness Mistakes are lessons to learn and to do better next time Personal responsibility The belongingness and ownership to the participants Sharing To discuss and argue about ideas in open forum with all stakeholders
What it is?
Participatory research is not an alternative
research method, but an approach that can be applied to any methodology survey, experimental, qualitative (Lilja and Bellon 2008). PRA methods, as they are often called, are visual and tangible and usually performed by small groups of people. (Chambers 2007) PRA comprised of different research tools to facilitate local people in
Analyzing information Practicing critical self-awareness Taking responsibility Sharing their knowledge of life and conditions to
Definition
As it has diverse application and has been
changing rapidly any effort to define it might be folly and unhelpful. An approach and methods for learning about rural life and conditions from, with and by rural people. (Chambers 1994)
Evolution
Originally evolved from Rapid Rural Appraisal
and spread fast in the 1990s. Shift in rhetoric: from top-down to bottom up, from centralized to local diversity, from blue prints to learning process. (Chambers 1994) Learning is two way system and respondents know better his/her daily encounter. Emphasis on the power relation between the researcher and researched. Practicing participatory research started since 1983 in Bangladesh.
Evolution
Five streams which stand out as sources
Agro-ecosystem Analysis
Gordon Conway developed this approach in
Thailand at the University of Chiang Mai around the year 1978. It contributed much in current RRA and PRA through:
Transects (Systematic walks and observation); Informal mapping (Sketch maps drawn on site); Diagramming (Seasonal Calendars, flow and causal
diagrams, bar charts, van or chapati diagrams ) Innovation assessment (scoring and ranking different actions)
Applied Anthropology
PRA represents an extension and
application of social anthropological approaches, insights, and methods, crossfertilized with others. Insights and contributions from Applied Anthropology:
Field learning is flexible art rather than rigid
science; The value of field residence, unhurried participant observation, and conversations; The importance of attitude, behavior and rapport;
understanding of
Complexity, diversity and risk-proneness of
many farming system; The knowledge, professionalism and rationality of small and poor farmers; Their experimental mindset and behavior; Their ability to conduct their own analysis.
development tourism. Disillusion with questionnaire surveys and their confusing results; Cost-effective.
Whats in it?
Where it is applied?
PRA applications include:
Natural Resource Management; Agriculture; Poverty and Social Programs; Health and Food Security Analysis.
Project Cycle
From inception to end. Participatory projects pull methods, attitudes and
Practical Example
VGDUP- Vulnerable Group Development for
Ultra-poor
What are the indicators?
Owning less than 10 decimals of land(0.04 ha) No ownership of production assets There are no active adult male house hold members Employment, if any is limited to day-laboring or domestic help The household is de facto headed by a women (divorced, abandoned, widow, unmarried)
involves local people taking part in other people's projects, according to agendas set by external interests. (Cornwall 1996) Remained donor driven and imposed. Lack of proper training distorts the overall objectives of this approach. Methods are often used to extract infos rather than to empower. Even the term carpet-bombed with PRA came forward due to its over utilization. Shortcomings of some methods like community meetings and widespread use of group discussion.
Bibliography
Lilja , Nina and Mauricio Bellon ; Some common questions
about participatory research: a review of the literature, Development in Practice, Volume 18, Numbers 45, August 2008.
Chambers, Robert; The Origins and Practice of Participatory
rural appraisal (PRA) and the participatory process in De Koning, Korrie and Martin Marion (1996). Participatory Research in Health: Issues and Experiences. Zen Books Ltd., London.