Office of the President of the Philippines

National Anti-Poverty Commission

WORKSHOP 1

ASSESSING PARTICIPATION AND REPRESENTATION IN THE BUBS

Summing Conferences on the 2012 BUB

Office of the President of the Philippines

National Anti-Poverty Commission

Assessing what happened

Participation and representation in the LPRAP

Looking forward to what will be

How do we know if we are successful Our suggestions to improve the BUB

The role of NGAs/RPRATs

Summing Conferences on the 2012 BUB

Office of the President of the Philippines

National Anti-Poverty Commission

Information is
freely available for those who will be affected by decisions adequate, relevant, easily understandable

Decision-making and enforcement follow set rules and regulations, thus make for predictable governance behavior
Summing Conferences on the 2012 BUB

Office of the President of the Philippines

National Anti-Poverty Commission

Powerholders and authority answer for their actions towards those affected by the formers decisions and actions Government officials are responsive to the needs of the citizens from whom their power is derived and subject themselves to monitoring. A system of performance measurement, feedback, grievance, redress mechanisms are in place and functioning

Summing Conferences on the 2012 BUB

Office of the President of the Philippines

National Anti-Poverty Commission

A process, not an event, by which stakeholders influence and share control over priority setting, policymaking, resource allocations, and/or programme implementation Voices of different stakeholders are heard and included Concrete roles and contributions of the most marginalized and affected groups are integrated into the various initiatives to improve their conditions
Summing Conferences on the 2012 BUB

Citizens are free to associate, capacitate

Office of the President of the Philippines

National Anti-Poverty Commission

No participation

Summing Conferences on the 2012 BUB

Adelfo V. Briones, MA

Office of the President of the Philippines

National Anti-Poverty Commission SELF-MOBILIZATION. Initiatives

taken independently

from official institutions. INTERACTIVE. Joint analysis and decisions for actions, monitors, etc.
FUNCTIONAL. Decisions by outsiders, groups form to meet objectives. INCENTIVES. People work for cash, food, etc. CONSULTATION. People answer questions but outsiders define design. INFORMATION. People answer survey teams questions, no follow up.
Summing Conferences PASSIVE. People are told what will happen. on the 2012 BUB

Office of the President of the Philippines

National Anti-Poverty Commission

Workshop 1 Objectives ASSESSING PARTICIPATION AND REPRESENTATION IN THE BUBs

By the end of Workshop 1, we should be able to:

1. Determine the extent of CSO, basic sector, and citizen group PARTICIPATION and REPRESENTATION in the crafting of the LPRAPs 2. Clarify whether the crafting of the LPRAPs was a product of INFORMED DECISION-MAKING 3. Determine the extent to which STAKEHOLDERS participated in the PRIORITY-SETTING during planning 4. Identify the CONSTRAINTS in the crafting of the LPRAPs
Summing Conferences on the 2012 BUB

Office of the President of the Philippines

National Anti-Poverty Commission

Workshop 1
Participation of Stakeholders in priority setting during planning?

Participatory Factors in the BUB

Presence of CSOs/basic sector/CGs that participated in LPRAP? (number & sectoral representation) 0 = Dont know | 1 = None 2 = A few | 3 = Substantial Why the rating? 1. LGUs
BMC/CCAGG, Jeepney Assn., 4Ps parent leader, Irrig. Association, Womens Organization, Anti Destroyer Org., Religious Org. -Present/Participated

Informed decision making?

What were the constraints?

Comments

0 = Dont know | 1 = Never 2 = Sometimes | 3 = Yes Why the rating?

3, The data being used are from CBMS, PIP And AIP which are updated yearly. These data were validated and monitored by the CMOs of the CCAGG and representative s of local CSOs Time too short -submission was only 3 days after the orientation (Apr. 19, 2012) Consider a longer time frame next time.

3
2. CSOs, basic sectors, CGs 3. RPRAT/ NGAs

3 Participated by BDC, Municipal and Provl CSOs so with other sectoral representatives.

-DILG, DA, DOH, DepEd

-Participated NAPC Provl Coor. participated

3- Yes Priorities are based from inter-angency priority plans.

Summing Conferences on the 2012 BUB

Due to the limited time, other agencies were not able to catch up to input their priority projects. And programs (i.e.

-do-