Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
School of Medicine
Workshop on How to Read (Medical) Papers
2. 3.
4.
Outline
Next, an exercise
Meaning abdomen extremities; height heart sameness; unchanging larynx ear disease vessel; duct
Medical term ?
Medical term
abdominoplasty acrophobia cardiogenic homeostasis laryngoscope otitis pathology vasectomy
Outline
Prognosis: determining what is likely to happen to someone whose disease is picked up at an early stage. Preferred study design is longitudinal cohort study. Causation: determining whether a supposed harmful agent, such as environmental pollution, is related to the development of illness. Preferred study design is cohort or casecontrol study, depending on how rare the disease is, but case reports may also provide crucial Information.
3. Parts of a paper
a. b. c. d. e. f. g. Title Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion References (Concise information) (Summary) (Background, hypothesis) (Design) (Facts) (Interpretation) (Bibliography)
Outline
3 Make a first quick reading: Mark all concepts and words you dont understand; Think and make notes about what you understood and the doubts you might get. 4 Vocabulary: Look up the terms you didnt understand, but not everything, just what is essential to get the main ideas. 5 Read the article again, but more thoroughly: take notes about questions, doubts; sum up the main ideas as you read them; answer the guiding questions as you read. 6 Think critically about the article: answer the critical questions.
References
Guiding questions:
What is the hypothesis the article tries to test in the study? What are the research questions? What are the objectives of the article? What research has been carried out before on the subject? How does this study contribute to the discipline?
Back
Critical questions:
Introduction: What is the overall purpose of the research? Do you agree with the author's rationale for studying the question in this way? Methods: Were the measurements appropriate for the questions the researcher was approaching? Results What is the one major finding? Were enough of the data presented so that you feel you can judge for yourself how the experiment turned out? Did you see patterns or trends in the data that the author did not mention? Were there problems that were not addressed? Discussion Do you agree with the conclusions drawn from the data? Are these conclusions over-generalized or appropriately careful? Are there other factors that could have influenced, or accounted for, the results?
Back
References
Structure of Medical Terminology: http://www.texashste.com/classroom_resources/course_g University of North Texas hste - A Language of its Own
Terminology: Lists of root words and affixes: http://www.mtworld.com/tools_resources/root_words.php? MTWorld - Roots http://www.globalrph.com/medterm4.htm Gobalrph Roots and affixes
References.
Structure of medical papers: http://www.hkmj.org/article_pdfs/hkm1108p315.pdf Clinical Epidemiology Workshop
How to read Medical Papers: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2127173/pd Trisha Greenhalgh http://www.smj.org.sa/PDFFiles/Apr04/01Reading.pdf Reading Critically (FahadA.Al-Ateeg) Help on pronunciation: http://text-to-speech.imtranslator.net/