Sie sind auf Seite 1von 61

Organizational Behavior: Motivation Essence of Life

Gholipour A. 2006. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran.

Motivation Defined
Motivation: Psychological processes that cause the arousal
direction, and persistence of voluntary actions that are goal directed.

Implications Associated with This Definition


Behavior is purposive rather than random - People exhibit both positive (work done on time) and negative (arrive late for work) behavior for a reason Motivation arouses people to do something - People are unlikely to change a behavior or do something different unless they are motivated to do so Motivation causes people to focus on a desired end-result or goal Motivation fuels the persistence needed to exhibit sustained effort on a task

Gholipour A. 2006. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran.

Types of Motives 1- Primary Motives


Physiological, Unlearned

2- General Motives
Not Physiological, Unlearned

3- Secondary Motives
Learned, Psychological
Gholipour A. 2006. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran.

Content vs. Process Motivation Theories Content theories


explain why people have different needs at different times. Implications of Content Theories: 1. Match rewards with employee needs 2. Offer employees a choice of rewards 3. people have different needs at different times 4. Limit use of financial rewards as a source of motivation

Process theories
describe the processes through which needs are translated into behavior

Gholipour A. 2006. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran.

The Motivation Process


Unsatisfied Need Drives Satisfied Need Tension Search Behavior Reduction of Tension

Gholipour A. 2006. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran.

Maslows Hierarchy of Needs

Selfactualization Esteem Social Safety Physiological

Gholipour A. 2006. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran.

Needs Hierarchy Theory


Needs Hierarchy Theory SelfActualization Esteem Belongingness Safety Physiological

Maslow arranged five needs in a hierarchy Satisfaction-progression process People who experience selfactualization desire more rather than less of this need

Gholipour A. 2006. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran.

ERG Theory
Needs Hierarchy Theory SelfActualization Esteem Belongingness Safety Existence Physiological Relatedness ERG Theory

Growth

Alderfers model has three sets of needs Adds frustrationregression process to Maslows model

Gholipour A. 2006. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran.

Content Theories of Motivation


Needs Hierarchy Theory SelfActualization Esteem Belongingness Safety Existence Physiological Relatedness Hygienes ERG Theory Motivator--Hygiene McClellands Theory Learned Needs Need for Achievement Need for Power Need for Affiliation

Growth

Motivators

Gholipour A. 2006. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran.

Herzbergs Two-Factor Theory


Hygiene Factors
Quality of supervision Rate of pay Company policies Working conditions Relations with others Job security
High Job Dissatisfaction

Motivational Factors
Career Advancement Personal growth Recognition Responsibility Achievement
0
Job Satisfaction High

Gholipour A. 2006. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran.

Herzbergs Motivator-Hygiene Model


No Satisfaction Jobs that do not offer achievement recognition, stimulating work, responsibility, and advancement.

Motivators

Satisfaction Jobs offering achievement, recognition, stimulating work, responsibility, and advancement. No Dissatisfaction Jobs with good company policies, and administration, technical supervision, salary, interpersonal relationships with supervisors, and working conditions.

Dissatisfaction Hygiene Jobs with poor company policies, and administration, technical supervision salary, interpersonal relationships with supervisors, and working conditions.

Factors

Gholipour A. 2006. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran.

David C. McClelland and Achievement Needs


Characteristics of High Achievers

. 1. Moderate Risk Taking . 2. Need for Immediate Feedback . 3. Satisfaction with Accomplishments . 4. Preoccupation with the Task

Gholipour A. 2006. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran.

Little Ambition

Theory X Workers

Dislike Work Avoid Responsibility Self-Directed

Theory Y Workers

Enjoy Work Accept Responsibility

Gholipour A. 2006. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran.

Specific Goals

Goal-Setting Theory

Challenging Goals Goals and Participation

Gholipour A. 2006. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran.

Effective Goal Setting


Specific Relevant Challenging Commitment Participation Challenging
Gholipour A. 2006. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran.

Task Effort

Task Performance

Reinforcement Theory
Rewards

Consequences

No Rewards

Behavior

Punishment
Gholipour A. 2006. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran.

Equity Theory
Perceived Ratio Comparisona
Outcomes A Inputs A Outcomes A Inputs A Outcomes A Inputs A
a

Employees Assessment
Inequity (Under-Rewarded) Equity Inequity (Over-Rewarded)

< = >

Outcomes B Inputs B Outcomes B Inputs B Outcomes B Inputs B

Person A is the employee, and person B is a relevant other or referent.


Gholipour A. 2006. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran.

Elements of Equity Theory


Outcome/input ratio
inputs -- what employee contributes (e.g. skill) outcomes -- what employees receive (e.g. pay)

Comparison other
person/people we compare ratio with not easily identifiable

Equity evaluation
compare outcome/input ratio with the comparison other

Gholipour A. 2006. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran.

Negative and Positive Inequity


A. An Equitable Situation
Self Other

$2

= $2 per hour 1 hour

$4

= $2 per hour 2 hours

Gholipour A. 2006. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran.

Negative and Positive Inequity (cont)


B. Negative Inequity
Self Other

$2

= $2 per hour 1 hour

$3 1 hour

= $3 per hour

Gholipour A. 2006. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran.

Negative and Positive Inequity (cont)


C. Positive Inequity
Self Other

$3

= $3 per hour 1 hour

$2

= $1 per hour 1 hours

Gholipour A. 2006. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran.

Consequences of Inequity
1. Change inputs 2. Change outcomes 3. Change perceptions 4. Leave the field 5. Act on the comparison other 6. Change the comparison other Equity Sensitivity Benevolents
Tolerant of being underrewarded

Equity Sensitives
Want ratio to be equal to the comparison other

Entitleds
Prefer receiving proportionately more than others
Gholipour A. 2006. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran.

Organizational Justice
Distributive Justice :
The perceived fairness of how resources and rewards are distributed.

Procedural Justice:
The perceived fairness of the process and procedures used to make allocation decisions.

Interactional Justice:
The perceived fairness of the decision makers behavior in the process of decision making.

Gholipour A. 2006. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran.

Expectancy Theory of Motivation


E-to-P Expectancy 1 P-to-O Expectancy 2 Outcomes & Valences 3

Outcome 1
+ or -

Organizational Rewards

Individual

Individual

Effort

Performance

Outcome 2
+ or -

1. Effort-performance relationship 2. Performance-rewards relationship

Outcome 3
+ or -

Personal Goals

3. Rewards-personal goals relationship


Gholipour A. 2006. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran.

Vrooms Expectancy Theory Concepts


Expectancy: Belief that effort leads to a specific level of performance

Instrumentality: A performance outcome perception.

Valence: The Value of a reward or outcome

Gholipour A. 2006. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran.

Determine the outcomes. Identify good performance so appropriate behaviors can be rewarded. Make sure employees can achieve targeted performance levels. Link desired outcomes to targeted levels of performance. Make sure changes in outcomes are large enough to motivate high effort. Monitor the reward system for inequities.

Managerial Implications of Expectancy Theory

Expectancy Theory in Practice: Increasing the E-to-P expectancy

training, selection, resources, clarify roles, provide coaching and feedback Measure performance accurately, explain how rewards are based on past performance Use valued rewards, individualize rewards, minimize countervalent outcomes

Increasing the P-to-O expectancy Increasing outcome valences

Gholipour A. 2006. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran.

Organizational Implications of Expectancy Theory


Reward people for desired performance, and do not keep pay decisions secret. Design challenging jobs. Tie some rewards to group accomplishments to build teamwork and encourage cooperation. Reward managers for creating, monitoring, and maintaining expectancies, instrumentalities, and outcomes that lead to high effort and goal attainment. Monitor employee motivation through interviews or anonymous questionnaires. Accommodate individual differences by building flexibility into the motivation program.
Gholipour A. 2006. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran.

Goals
Goal: What an individual is trying to accomplish.
Directing ones attention Regulating ones effort Increasing ones persistence Encouraging the development of goalattainment strategies or action plans
Gholipour A. 2006. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran.

Goals motivate the individual by...

Task performance

Insights from Goal-Setting Research


Difficult Goals Lead to Higher Performance. - Easy goals produce low effort because the goal is too easy to achieve. - Impossible goals ultimately lead to lower performance because people begin to experience failure. Specific Difficult Goals Lead to Higher Performance for Simple Rather Than Complex Tasks. - Goal specificity pertains to the quantifiability of a goal. - Specific difficult goals impair performance on novel, complex tasks when employees do not have clear strategies for solving these types of problems. Feedback Enhances The Effect of Specific, Difficult Goals. - Goals and feedback should be used together. Participative Goals, Assigned Goals, and Self-Set Goals Are Equally Effective. - Managers should set goals by using a contingency approach. Different methods work in different situations. Goal Commitment and Monetary Incentives Affect Goal-Setting Outcomes. - Difficult goals lead to higher performance when employees are committed to their goals. - Difficult goals lead to lower performance when employees are not committed to their goals. - Goal based incentives can lead to negative outcomes for employees in complex, interdependent jobs requiring cooperation. * Employees may not help each other. * Quality may suffer as employees pursue quantity goals. * Commitment to difficult goals may suffer.
Gholipour A. 2006. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran.

Guidelines for Writing SMART Goals

S pecific M easurable A ttainable R esults oriented T ime bound


Gholipour A. 2006. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran.

Effect of Goal Difficulty on Performance


High

Task Performance

Area of Optimal Goal Difficulty

Low

Moderate

Challenging

Impossible

Gholipour A. 2006. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran.

Goal Difficulty

Approaches to Job Design


1. The Mechanistic Approach focuses on identifying the most efficient way to perform a job. Employees are trained and rewarded to perform their jobs accordingly. 2. Motivational Approaches these techniques (job enlargement, job rotation, job enrichment, and job characteristics) attempt to improve employees affective and attitudinal reactions and behavioral outcomes. 3. Biological and Perceptual- Motor Approaches Biological techniques focus on reducing employees physical strain, effort, fatigue, and health complaints. The Perceptual-Motor Approach emphasizes the reliability of work outcomes by examining error rates, accidents, and workers feedback about facilities and equipment.

Gholipour A. 2006. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran.

The Job Characteristics Model


Core job characteristics *Skill variety *Task identity *Task significance *Autonomy *Feedback from job Critical psychological states *Experienced meaningfulness of the work *Experienced responsibility for outcomes of the work *Knowledge of the actual results of the work activities Outcomes *High internal work motivation *High growth satisfaction *High general job satisfaction *High work effectiveness

Moderators 1. Knowledge and skill 2. Growth need strength 3. Context satisfactions


Gholipour A. 2006. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran.

Skills and Best Practices: Applying the Job Characteristics Model


1. Diagnose the level of employee motivation and job. satisfaction and consider redesigning jobs when motivation ranges from low to moderate. Determine whether job redesign is appropriate in a given context. Redesign jobs by including employees input.

2. 3.

Gholipour A. 2006. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran.

How Satisfied are You with Your Job?


Job satisfaction is an effective or emotional response toward
various facets of ones job. What is your level of job satisfaction with recognition, compensation, and supervision? Is satisfaction across various aspects of your job equally important? Explain.

Gholipour A. 2006. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran.

Causes of Job Satisfaction


Need Fulfillment: Satisfaction is based on the extent to
which a job satisfies a persons needs.

Discrepancies: Satisfaction is determined by the extent to


which an individual receives what he or she expects from a job. which a job allows fulfillment of ones work values. is treated at work.

Value Attainment: Satisfaction results from the extent to Equity: Satisfaction is a function of how fairly an individual Trait/Genetic Components: Satisfaction is partly a function
of personal traits and genetic factors.

Gholipour A. 2006. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran.

Correlates of Job Satisfaction


Variables Related with Satisfaction
Motivation Job Involvement Moderate Organizational Citizenship behavior Organizational Commitment Absenteeism Tardiness Weak Turnover Moderate Heart Disease Moderate Perceived Stress Pro-Union Voting Moderate Life Satisfaction

Direction of Relationship
Positive Positive Positive Positive Negative Negative Negative Negative Negative Negative

Strength of Relationship
Moderate Moderate Strong Weak

Strong

Job Performance Positive Gholipour A. 2006. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran.


Positive

Weak

What Is Management by Objectives?


Organizational Objectives Divisional Objectives Departmental Objectives Individual Objectives
Gholipour A. 2006. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran.

Key Elements of MBO


Goal Specificity Participation in Decision Making

Explicit Time Period

Performance Feedback

Gholipour A. 2006. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran.

Linking MBO and Goal-Setting Theory


Difficulty of Goals Feedback on Performance Specificity of Goals Participation in Goal Setting

Gholipour A. 2006. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran.

Employee Recognition Programs


Defining Recognition Recognition and Reinforcement

Recognition Plans in Practice


Gholipour A. 2006. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran.

Employee Involvement Programs


Participative Management Representative Participation

Quality Circles

Employee Stock Ownership

Gholipour A. 2006. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran.

Variable Pay Plans


Piece Rate Profit Sharing

Gainsharing

Bonus Plans

Gholipour A. 2006. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran.

Skill-Based Pay Plans


Promotes Flexibility

Advantages

Facilitates Communication Satisfies Ambitious Workers

Topping Out

Disadvantages

Obsolescence of Skills Performance versus Skills

Gholipour A. 2006. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran.

Skill-Based Plans and Motivation Theories


Hierarchy of Needs Reinforcement Theory Need for Achievement

Equity Theory

Gholipour A. 2006. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran.

The Meaning of Money


Money and employee needs
affects several needs, not just existence needs

Money and attitudes


Money ethic -- not evil, represents success, should be budgeted carefully

Money and self-identity


Influences our self-perceptions Evidence that men more than women identify with money
..

Gholipour A. 2006. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran.

Types of Rewards in the Workplace


Membership and seniority Job status Competencies Performance
..

Gholipour A. 2006. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran.

Membership/Seniority Based Rewards


Fixed wages, seniority increases Advantages
guaranteed wages may attract job applicants seniority-based rewards reduce turnover

Disadvantages
doesnt motivate job performance discourages poor performers from leaving may act as golden handcuffs
Gholipour A. 2006. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran.

Job Status-Based Rewards


Includes job evaluation and status perks Advantages:
job evaluation tries to maintain pay equity motivates competition for promotions

Disadvantages:
employees exaggerate duties, hoard resources creates psychological distance across hierarchy Inconsistent with flatter organizations
Gholipour A. 2006. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran.

Competency-Based Rewards
Pay increases with competencies acquired or demonstrated Skill-based pay Advantages
Pay increases with skill modules learned More flexible work force, better quality, consistent with employability Potentially subjective, higher training costs
Gholipour A. 2006. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran.

Disadvantages

Performance-Based Rewards
Stock ownership Organizational Stock options rewards Profit sharing Team Gainsharing rewards Bonuses Piece rate Commissions Royalties Merit pay

Individual rewards

Gholipour A. 2006. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran.

Problems with Performance Rewards


Shift attention away from motivation job itself to extrinsic rewards Create a psychological distance with reward giver Discourage risk taking Used as quick fixes
Gholipour A. 2006. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran.

Improving Reward Effectiveness


Link rewards to performance Ensure rewards are relevant Team rewards for interdependent jobs Ensure rewards are valued Beware of unintended consequences
..

Gholipour A. 2006. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran.

Job Design
Assigning tasks to a job, including the interdependency of those tasks with other jobs Technology influences, but does not determine, job design Employability affects job design
.

Gholipour A. 2006. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran.

Evaluating Job Specialization


Advantages
Less time changing tasks Lower training costs Job mastered quickly Better person-job matching

Disadvantages
Job boredom Discontentment pay Lower quality Lower motivation

Gholipour A. 2006. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran.

Job Characteristics Model


Core Job Characteristics Critical Psychological States Outcomes

Skill variety Task identity Task significance Autonomy Feedback from job

Meaningfulness

Work motivation Growth satisfaction General satisfaction Work effectiveness

Responsibility Knowledge of results Individual differences

Gholipour A. 2006. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran.

Job Rotation vs. Job Enlargement


Job Rotation Job 1 Operate Camera Job 2 Operate Sound Job 3 Report Story

Job Enlargement Job 1 Operate Camera Operate Sound Report Story Job 2 Operate Camera Operate Sound Report Story Job 3 Operate Camera Operate Sound Report Story

Gholipour A. 2006. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran.

Job Enrichment Strategies


Empowering employees
giving employees more autonomy feeling of control and self-efficacy

Forming natural work units


completing an entire task assigning employees to specific clients

Establishing client relationships


employees put in direct contact with clients

Gholipour A. 2006. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran.

Obstacles to Job Design


Difficult to accurately measure job characteristics Resistance to change
skilled workers labor union leaders supervisors

Problem finding optimal level of enrichment and specialization


Gholipour A. 2006. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran.

A Job Performance Model of Motivation


Individual Inputs
Ability, Job knowledge Dispositions & Traits Emotions, Moods, &Affect Beliefs & Values

Skills

Motivational Processes
Arousal Attention & Direction Intensity & Persistence Motivated Behaviors

Job Context
Physical Environment Task Design Rewards & Reinforcement Supervisory Support & Coaching Social Norms Organizational Culture

Enable, Limit

Gholipour A. 2006. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran.

A Job Performance Model of Motivation (cont.)


Skills
Individual Inputs

Motivated Behaviors
Focus: Direction, What we do Intensity: Effort, how hard we try Quality: Task strategies, the way we do it Duration: Persistence, how long we stick to it

Motivational Processes

Performance

Job Context

Enable, Limit

Gholipour A. 2006. Organizational Behavior. University of Tehran.

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen