Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Contents
Background
Tax Rates Scheme of overall computation under DTC Income from Employment, personal taxation, tax deductions to individuals
Page 2
Contents
Life Insurance Policies Taxation in Investors hands Business Reorganisation Non resident taxation Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) Dividend Distribution Tax (DDT) Concept of WHC/CHC and deemed dividend TDS/TCS Return, Assessment, DRP, reassessment, rectification, Settlement commission, Authority for Advance Ruling
Penalties
Page 3
Background
12 August 2009: DTC Bill, 2009 and Discussion Paper released Inputs received from large number of organizations & individuals
News reports: over 10,000 responses from stakeholders Key areas of concern identified
Bill referred to Standing Committee of MPs for further deliberations Committee to have one more round of public consultation
Page 4
15%
18% of adjusted book profits 1% on net wealth exceeding INR 3 mn
15%
20% of adjusted book profits 1% on net wealth exceeding INR 10 mn#
*Exclusive of surcharge and education cess # DTC 2010 proposes to widen the category of assets subject to wealth tax to include, inter alia, helicopters, drawings, paintings, archaeological collections, sculptures, interest in foreign trusts, controlled foreign companies abroad.
Page 5
500,001 800,000
Above 800,000
20%
30%
500,001 1,000,000
Above 1,000,000
20%
30%
*No education cess. Special exemption for women withdrawn. Senior citizen to get additional benefit of Rs 50,000.
Page 6
Page 7
Income from Employment. House property. Business. Residuary 1 Capital gain (for residents as also non residents)
Resident
Non Resident
Page 9
Leave Encashment Gratuity VRS compensation / retrenchment compensation under Industrial Disputes Act Commutation of pension from approved Superannuation Fund upto specified limit Withdrawals from approved Provident Fund and New Pension Scheme Non-chargeability of perquisites by way of specified medical treatment/expenditure reimbursement ESOPs
1 Pension
fund, Superannuation fund, Provident fund. Contribution to superannuation fund in excess of Rs. 1 lakh is disallowable in hands of employer but deductible in hands of employee.
2 Though
concept of NOR is done away with, exemption for income accruing outside India is provided for individuals satisfying the conditions of NOR Page 10
Prescribed allowances to meet personal expenses (eg. Hilly/difficult area allowance, children education allowance, etc)
.
1 Press
Page 11
Medical expense reimbursement limit enhanced from Rs. 15,000/- to Rs. 50,000/Sponsored foreign medical treatment limit liberalised Employers contribution to approved superannuation fund not taxable even in excess of Rs 1,00,0003 Accelerated taxation of employers contributions to unapproved funds Withdrawal of leave Travel concession4 No option for paying tax sheltered non-monetary perquisites Reimbursement of mediclaim premium for family members of employees made taxable Salary for rest/leave period preceded or succeeded by services in India
3 However,
contribution in excess of Rs 100,000 is disallowable in hands of employer 4 Press report suggests it will be included as part of prescribed allowance to meet personal expenses.
Page 12
Definition of employer
Employer is not defined in ITA. DTC defines as follows :employer means a person who controls an individual under an express or implied contract of employment and is obliged to compensate him by way of salary
Withholding obligation on an employer who makes the payment which is in the nature of salary [S. 384(187)(a)]
Page 13
Facility of longer stay ( 60 to 181 days) while on visit to India without triggering tax residence in India withdrawn. Such persons will become resident in India if the stay during the year 60 days and the stay in the preceding 4 years 365 days.
Public Provident Fund Statutory/ Approval Provident Fund New Pension Scheme Pure life insurance policy (premium is less than 5% of capital sum assured)
ITA
100,0001 15,000 100,0001 50,000 (disability) 100,000 (severe disability)
DTC 10
Aggregate not to exceed Rs 50,000 50,000 (disability) 100,000 (severe disability) 50,000 (disability)
50,000 (disability)
per DTC 10, interest is allowed as a deduction from total income. Thus, in a scenario where total income is NIL or insufficient to absorb the interest amount, the benefit will lapse unlike in case of ITA where loss from house property could be carried forward
Page 15
Page 16
ITA
Ownership of house property
DTC 2010
Ownership of house property
1
Property which is let as also Property which is actually let vacant property (excluding one SOP) Property which is occupied Property which is occupied for for the purpose of business business is not a let property and hence, stands excluded from the charge in which is w.r.t actual letting. Chapter does not apply to property used as hospital, hotel, convention centre, cold storage and as part of SEZ2
1 Under 2 The
ITA, lessee of a lease of more than 12 years was considered to be the owner. This fiction is absent in DTC conjunction in section 24(5)(ii)should have been or instead of and. Lease income of SEZ developer may be business income under S.33(3)(c). This makes it easier for SEZ developer to claim incentive by claiming the income to be business income. There is no such specific provision in respect of Industrial Park.
Page 17
ITA
Notional amount can also be part of annual value or annual rent.
DTC 2010
Standard deduction 3 Interest on unlet property Interest on Loan for let property Pre-construction interest
3 The
No scope for notional addition. Gross rent comprises of rent actually received 3 Receipt of arrears is chargeable in No change the year of receipt Unrealised rent is, in specified Rent is chargeable on receivable cases chargeable only in the year basis. There is no back up provision of realization. to exclude unrealised rent. 30% 20% Upto Rs 1.5 lakhs for a property which is self occupied No cap on deduction Amortization over 5 years from the year of acquisition / construction Upto Rs 1.5 lakh under S.74 provided the property is not at all let throughout the year 4 No cap on deduction Amortization over 5 years from the year of acquisition/ construction
service tax collection may form part of gross rent. Unlike in DTC 2009, there is no specific back up deduction in respect of payment of service tax. 4 Deduction allowed to individual and HUF as tax incentives from gross total income. Unlike in ITA which permits carry forward of loss, in DTC, taxpayer will forfeit the claim if there is no positive gross total income.
Page 18
The chapter is applicable for house properties ready for use [section 24(5)(b)]. Subject to exception in respect of SEZ, hotel etc, if income is assessable as business income, the chapter is applicable notwithstanding that letting is in the nature of trade, commerce or business. The definition of term house property may leave litigation prone scope for one to suggest that the chapter cannot apply when there is bare letting without facility or service.
Security deposit against long term leasing of 12 years or more is considered as income under residuary head. Amount allowed as deduction in the year of repayment.
Page 19
Business income
Page 20
Business income
Other business
Each business result (whether +ve or ve) to be aggregated though S. 30(2) requires separate calculation for each business
Page 21
Classification of Assets
Business Trading Asset Capital Asset
Investment asset.
Capital asset self generated in the course of business. Intangibles being goodwill, trademark, brand name, right to manufacture, right to carry on business, tenancy right, licence, etc. Tangibles1 being building, machinery, plant or furniture. Any other capital asset2 connected with or used for business purpose.
By definition of capital asset excludes business trading assets It is a capital asset other than business capital asset. Includes specifically undertaking / division of a business Includes specifically, any security (including derivatives3) held by FII.
1 2
Even if not connected to business? Specifically excludes land. Can issue arise for shares in subsidiary etc with business linkage ? 3 By definition, generally, these assets will not constitute investment assets.
Page 22
Set up of business
Successful trial run of plant in case of business of manufacture, production or processing. Readiness to commence commercial operations in any other case.
Unit manufacturing, processing, producing or trading in same goods but located physically apart Manufacturing, processing producing in same goods, but utilizing different raw material or manufacturing process Maintenance of separate books of account or capable of being maintained Presumptive basis of taxation Special source income Speculative transactions in nature of business
Page 23
Loss from all businesses in ordinary source segment largely fungible for the
Page 24
Gross Earnings
Rent Income of SEZ developers, hospital, hotel, convention center, cold storage excluded from House Property chapter. Such rental
Sale of business undertaking/ division is part of capital gains chapter. Reimbursements to be taxed only on receipt basis (S.33(2)(xxi)
Interest income is residuary source income except in case of financial institution (33(3)(b)
Page 25
Normal Scheme
(B) (C)
(D)
Profits of business
A- (B+C+D)
Normal scheme will not apply to business of : Insurance, Mineral Oil & Natural gas, SEZ developer, businesses eligible for Investment linked incentives and presumptive cases. [But,
Page 26
Subsidy from any person or the Government for or in connection with business.
Profit on sale any licence obtained in connection with business Profit on transfer of any right or benefit under any scheme of Government, etc.
Any amount received on cessation, termination or forfeiture of any agreement entered in the course of business
Any amount received or accrued on transfer of carbon credit Value of benefit or perquisites along the lines of ITA irrespective of whether they are convertible into money or not
Page 27
Amount of reduction, remission or cessation of any liability by way of loan, deposit, advance or trade credit.
Stagnant trade creditor > 5 years from year of last transaction is presumed to be a case of remission. [Retroactive application for past accumulation will need to be guarded]
Remission enjoyed by successor in business permits charge in the name of successor. For this purpose, succession includes cases of business reorganisation and any other successor in business
Advance, Security Deposit (SD), etc. from long term leasing (>12 years) or transfer of whole or part of or any interest in business asset [May have prospective application since it is linked to receipt] [Provision for grant of deduction in the year of payment (S. 35(2)(xliii) now introduced]
Operating Expenditure
Laid out or expended wholly and exclusively for purposes of the business.
Specified Trading losses, including payments for remitted liability taxed in the past, bad debt provision for financial institution, notified NBFC etc
List of 42 items + Residuary item viz. the amount of any other expenditure, provided any other expenditure is not listed as disallowance under some other provision
Page 29
Operating Expenditure
Remuneration to any working participant of unincorporated body. Limits on deductibility to be now prescribed.
Entrance fees paid to club facility used for business Sales promotional expenses1 Deduction admissible for payment made in respect of remission/ cessation of liability assessed in the past
1DTC
09 limitation on allowability only to the extent charged to P&L A/c now deleted
Page 30
Operating Expenditure
Quantum of H.O. expenses of NR attributable restricted to 0.5% of total turnover or gross receipts of business in India (instead of existing limit of 5% of total income).
Provision for doubtful debts for bank and FIs restricted to 1% of average advances (instead of 7.5%
Provisions along the lines of section 43B of ITA introduced in DTC ,10 w.r.t items being land revenue, taxes, employers contribution, bonus/ commission, leave salary, gratuity
1Under
Page 31
Interest payable to trade creditors Proportionate amount of discount or premium payable on bonds or debentures as per method to be prescribed.
Interest payable to working participant of unincorporated body. Limit on deduction to be prescribed (ITA permits deduction @ 12%)
Pre-set up finance expenditure. Expenditure pertaining to period up to the date the asset is put to use (and, unlike ITA, this is not restricted to cases involving extension of existing business)
Issue expenses of convertible debentures, bonds or share capital Specific disallowance is provided for interest paid to SME in terms of section 23 of Micro, Small and
Medium Enterprises Development Act. The Allied Act specifically has provision prohibiting deduction of
interest paid or payable by any buyer
Page 32
Limit continues to be @200% as in ITA Scientific R&D definition modified. Scope restricted to basic research, applied
Quality control
Research in social sciences or humanities Prospecting, etc of minerals, petroleum or natural gas Commercial production or use of a new or improved material, device or product Style changes Routine data collection
Page 33
Scope restricted :
Available only for expenditure incurred for carrying out R&D in the inhouse facility Expense on clinical trials and patent registration would not qualify. DTC 10 now excludes cost of land/ building along the lines of ITA
Benefit not available where R&D is the business of the assessee [S. 41 (4)] Benefit approval continues for the successor in business reorganisation
Page 34
Expenditure attributable to exempt income (contrast in relation to as per existing ITA) Provision for unascertained liability Expenditure, including capital expenditure, in favour of an associated person to the extent it is excessive/unreasonable*.
*Applicable to all heads of income. ** Financial Institution defined to include (a) a banking company or a scheduled bank; NBFC, a public financial institution; state financial corporations; state industrial investment corporations; etc
Page 35
DTC
Deductible even if paid before due date of return [s.35(6) r.w.s 35 (2) (xxx)] Beyond that, in year of actual payment Deductible only in year of actual payment [s.35(2)(xxix)]
Page 36
Actual cost to be deemed WDV notionally calculated on stand alone basis for assets acquired :
From any holding or subsidiary company. Subsidiary means as per Cos Act and includes overseas subsidiary. As a result, fiction applies regardless of whether:1
New categories of depreciable assets added [E.g Rails] (Refer separate slide for major changes compared to ITA) Amortization for certain expenditure (E.g. preliminary expenses, VRS compensation, etc.) provided. Chief additions are non compete, Premium for obtaining asset on lease, VRS, loss on any agreement etc (Refer separate slide for comparative analysis). Lessee in a financial lease is owner eligible for depreciation Depreciation will be allowed even on cessation of block if block value is positive. [Refer S. 38(2)]
Loss on transfer of non depreciable business capital asset allowed as business loss (Refer S. 42(3)
If block value falls below Rs. 1 L, full depreciation for residual value. [Refer 15th Schedule]
1 Can this have retrospective application in respect of concluded transaction? 2 Capital gains exemption still requires 100% holding
Page 37
Amortization of expenses
Sr No
1 2 3
Non compete fees Premium for obtaining any asset on lease or rent Amount paid to an employee on account of VRS
Expenditure incurred by a resident Indian on any operations relating to prospecting of mineral oil or development of mine or other natural deposit of any minerals Loss on forfeiture of any agreement entered in the course of business Preliminary expense in connection with setting up, extension of business or before the commencement
10
10
6 7
Not specified 10
6 6
Year in which the loss has been incurred Year of setting up, extension of business or commencement
Page 38
Page 40
A business capital asset obtained under Finance lease is considered to be owned by the lessee Impacts right to claim depreciation. There may also be MAT implications depending on the accounting treatment. But, evaluate the measure of actual cost in the assessment of lessee Lease is finance lease if the following conditions are fulfilled cumulatively
contract for lease is entered into between two parties for leasing of a specific asset; such contract is for use and occupation of the asset by the lessee; the lease payment is calculated so as to cover the full cost of the asset together with the interest charges; and the lessee is entitled to own, or has the option to own, the asset at the end of the lease period after making the lease payment;
Page 41
Security deposit receipt (SD) from the long term lease or transfer of an asset is chargeable as income, while repayment of security deposit is deductible as expense. [S. 33(2)(xx) and S.35(2)(xliii)]
long term leasing means,(a) (b)
lease for a term of not less than twelve years; or a lease which provides for the extension of the term thereof by a further term or terms, if the aggregate of the term for which such lease is to be granted and the further term or terms for which it can so extended is not less than twelve years
Page 42
Presumptive taxation
Page 43
10%
14%
Applies to NR
8%
8%*
Limit increased to 1 crore (from 40 lacs as per ITA) *applicable only to resident individuals, HUF or firms excluding LLP
Page 44
Rules to be prescribed for allocation of common costs If income actually earned is established to be more than presumptive rate, such higher amount is to be considered.
All books of account and other documents maintained; Accounts are audited; Accounts are correct and complete to AOs satisfaction; Income can be properly deduced from accounts; Accounts, documents are produced before AO when called for.
Page 45
Income in presumptive cases falling within special source is computed independently. E.g. Royalty, or interest income, etc of NR if not connected with PE
Question will arise about applicability of BPT in addition to presumptive tax income Litigation about applicability of MAT as subsists in ITA continues Lower rate TDS certificate may be required
Page 46
Industrial undertakings or infrastructural development Development of SEZ Specified industrial undertakings and units Natural Gas Exploration & Refining Area based incentive Hotels & Convention centers Undertaking situated in North-Eastern States Collecting and processing of Bio-degradable waster Employment of New workmen Offshore Banking unit/ International financial service centre Units of SEZ
1 April 2012
XIII
31 March 2014
XII
l.
Page 47
Capital gains
Page 48
Page 49
Scheme of taxation
Taxation as capital gain restricted to transfer of investment asset. Investment asset excludes
Business trading assets. Business capital assets as defined in S.284(39)1 Capital asset which is not a business capita asset Security held by FII Undertaking or division of a business
Asset being land constitutes an investment asset even if it is connected with business since the asset is excluded from scope of business capital asset. Land forming part of building may also constitute an investment asset. Capital gains taxed at the same rate as is applicable to any other income for taxpayers.
1. Gain from these is chargeable as business income. A residential house property of a taxpayer is his investment asset
Page 50
Scheme of taxation
Gain on transfer of investment asset transferred after the end of financial year next following the year of acquisition is computed separately. Such gain is calculated after considering:
None of the above adjustments permitted if asset is sold within one year from end of the year of acquisition Provision for including holding period of previous owner is absent. Losses from any other source available for set off against capital gains income. Capital loss is ring fenced. Capital loss can be adjusted against any other capital gain income (short term and long term without distinction) and carried forward for indefinite period.
2. Unlike in ITA, indexation benefit available w.r.t bonds and debentures 3 Refer S.55(6) of DTC, 10 for permitted roll over exemptions. Refer, specific slides dealing with rollover exemption.
Page 51
Scheme of taxation
Subject to deviations, most other exemption provisions, charging provisions are similar with provisions under ITA.
Holding WOS inter se transfer in favor of Indian transferee to continue to be tax sheltered
Subject to conditions (as to lock in period of 8 years and non conversion into stock in trade by transferee) as provided in ITA Tax liability trigged in the year of violation of condition (as against trigger in the year of original transfer under ITA).
Money or asset received by a participant on account of his retirement from Firm / LLP is taxable in the year receipt. [Refer S. 48(2)(b)]. Capital gain to be calculated by granting deduction in respect of capital balance [S.53(6)].
Firm / LLP is also taxed in respect of transfer by way of distribution of money or asset to participant. [Refer, S.48(1) Table item 7].
Will transaction results into double taxation ? Can double taxation be challenged on the strength of S.17?
Page 52
Scheme of taxation
Consideration for transfer of land or building is stamp duty value of the asset regardless of higher actual consideration received4 !!. [See overriding impact of S.50(2)(h) r.w. S.50(1) ] NIL cost to be fictionally adopted [S.53(7)(c)]
For all self generated assets if cost of acquisition is not capable of being determined or ascertained for any reason
CBDT to prescribe manner to determine fair market value for capital gains purposes
For determining full value of consideration [S.50(2) r.w S.314(93)] For determining value as on 1.04.2000 [Refer, S.53(1) / (3) r.w.S.314(93)]
4. ITA provides adoption of stamp duty value only if actual consideration received is lower than stamp duty value.
Page 53
Scheme of taxation
No back up provisions for cost of acquisition/ cost step up to transferee made in following cases.
Transfer of investment asset between holding subsidiary chargeable to capital gains on violation of condition resulting in taxation for transferor Transfer of investment asset under corporatisation of firm / proprietary concern chargeable to capital gains on violation of condition. Shareholders assessed to capital gains w.r.t value of asset received from company under liquidation. Participant assessed to capital gains w.r.t value of asset received from firm /LLP on his retirement.
Cost of acquisition of asset received on dissolution of Unincorporated Body (UB) is provided at cost to the U.B though, UB is made liable to tax w.r. to F.M.V.
Page 54
Scheme of taxation
Roll over Investment (S. 55(6))
Original Investment asset (OIA) Agricultural land New Investment asset (NIA) Conditions5
Purchase of one or more OIA was agricultural pieces of agricultural land land during two one year before or three immediate proceeding years from the end of the years to FY in which financial years in which OIA is asset is transferred transferred6 OIA was acquired at least one year before the beginning of FY in which asset is transferred
5 Unlike ITA,,DTC does not provide condition of 3 years lock in period for NIA and cost substitution in case of violation 6 If amount is not invested in purchase of asset by the end of the FY, amount is to be deposited in Capital Gain Deposit Scheme (CGDS) within six months from date of transfer or end of FY whichever is later. Amount in CGDS to be utilsed in purchase of NIA within stipulated time.
Page 55
Scheme of taxation
Original Investment asset (OIA) Any investment asset7 New Investment asset (NIA) Purchase or construction of one residential house one year before or three years from the end of the financial years in which OIA is transferred8 Conditions Taxpayer does not own more than one residential house other than NIA OIA was acquired at least one year before the beginning of FY in which asset is transferred NIA not to be transferred within one year from the year of FY from which NIA was acquired or constructed
Page 57
DTC 2010 Exempt by way of full deduction of gain More than 1 year No special rate 50% deduction for gains.
Position under ITA For listed shares, taxable at 10% without indexation or 20% with indexation benefit For others, taxable at 20% with indexation benefit. More than 1 year Normal rate
LTCG
1 No
specific provision for adjustment of currency fluctuation impact when shares are acquired by NR in foreign currency.
Page 58
Page 59
Scheme of taxation
Residuary head attracted only if income not included under any other specified heads. Certain sources of income, however, specifically covered1. [E.g. interest income, except in case of permitted financial institutions is chargeable under residual head] Applies only to income from ordinary sources; does not apply to income from special sources, such as e.g. interest income of non resident is covered as a special source. Dividend income is a residuary head income. S. 58(2)(a) of DTC 10 relieves charge only in case where, in respect of dividend, DDT has been paid. Unlike DTC, ITA s. 10(34) provides exclusion in respect of dividend referred to in section 115-O of ITA. Hence, if there is default of DDT payment under DTC, question may arise whether the exclusion of dividend income is permitted2.
1 Better
view is that an item of income specifically covered in section 56 of DTC10 is covered under this head, except where section 58 of DTC itself restricts under this head to charge cases which may be covered as business income. [Refer, slide on this topic enlisting such income] 2 The expression paid has been defined S.314(178) of DTC to mean actually paid. Doubt may arise whether the reference to method of accounting and expression incurred in definition Clause (a) of the section is safe enough to protect the case of recipient of dividend.
Page 60
Scheme of taxation
On a combined reading of s. 59(1)(a)(i) r.w.s 59(2) of DTC 10, it is doubtful whether, against dividend income from foreign company or against chargeable interest income or against any other form of chargeable dividend income, expenditure in the nature of interest will be allowable as deduction. (contrast the language employed in s. 57(1)(a)(i) r.w.s 57(2)(e) of DTC 09 ; refer also section 57 (iii) of ITA.) In DTC 10, the deduction seems restricted to amount paid by way of remuneration or commission.
Page 61
Amount of voluntary contribution received by any person [other than individual / HUF] from another3. Value of any property, being shares of a closely held company, received for inadequate consideration or, without consideration, by a firm or a company. Unlike ITA, there is no exclusion in a case where the receipt is by a Widely Held Company (WHC). However, the scope of closely held company (CHC) under DTC is different compared to ITA (refer different slides enumerating the concept of CHC and WHC) Attributable income of Controlled Foreign Company is chargeable under this head (subsequent dividend receipt will not be subject to charge under the Twentienth schedule)
Is this wide enough to cover a gift receipt of any kind by all other entities? Can it cover a case of transaction for inadequate consideration? Is expression amount wider enough to cover a receipt in kind?
Page 62
Advance, security deposit from the long term leasing or transfer of an investment asset, with consequent deduction in the year of repayment. In case of individual and HUF, value of money or specified property received as gift, including for consideration which is not adequate, continues to be chargeable. In case of immoveable property, the charge is limited only in case of a pure gift. Benefit received from a relative4 continues to be excluded.
4. The term relative has been defined in DTC 10 under S.314(214). r.w.s 58(4)(a). It has a wider as also restrictive scope depending on the circumstances of the case
Page 63
income.
Page 65
Exempt
B C D E
6. Premium payable does not exceed 5% of capital sum. Further, past policies not grandfathered . 7. Popularly known as ULIP 8. Premiums paid till interim receipts not deductible against subsequent receipts.
Page 67
Business reorganisation
Page 68
Business reorganisation
Defined to mean reorganisation of business of two or more residents*, involving [S. 314(41)]
Separate set of provisions apply to conversion of a company into LLP [Refer separate
slides] Tax neutrality in respect of gain arising on transfer of investment asset
Business Reorganisation
Successor is expected to continue to hold three fourth of the fixed assets of predecessor Continue the business of predecessor for five financial years succeeding the year of reorganization
Test of continuity not relevant for tax exemption Interestingly, section 46(2)(b) provides for charge back of capital gain if exemption conditions are breached. Issue arises about relevance thereof given the provisions which do not have any continuing requirement of compliance.
Page 70
Business Reorganisation
Proportionate deduction in respect of all capital allowances (including depreciation, amortisation, scientific research expense etc ) in the year of transition
WDV for the successor in all cases of business reorganization is calculated on the principle of stepping into shoes of predecessor In-house Scientific Research approval continues for the successor. Expenditure on business reorganisation to be amortised over 6 years (ITA 5 years) No specific provision for counting predecessors holding period of Investment asset-though, cost base is substituted for computing capital gains income However, no specific provision for cost substitution of non depreciable business capital asset for computing business income
Business Reorganisation
No specific provision along the lines of s. 43C of ITA in DTC providing for cost substitution for stock in trade of predecessor Is specific exemption required for business capital asset? Presently, exemption sections operation for capital gain from investment asset. No specific provision (except for tonnage tax scheme) for continuing tax benefit. Losses of Investment incentive linked eligible activities transitioned as part of ordinary source loss*
Amalgamation of companies
Unlike ITA, scheme of amalgamation to be in accordance with Companies Act 1956 [and as between two residents] Losses transition : Comparative conditions
ITA Amalgamating Co need to meet qualifying activity test Pre amalgamation condition of asset holding, etc. to apply Post amalgamation, test of continuity apply Results in transition of business/depreciation losses Losses reckoned upto the date of amalgamation, if appointed date is in the middle of the year DTC* No requirement of qualifying activity No such conditions Same conditions to apply; further power of notification of additional conditions Results in transition of all losses including capital/speculation losses!! Complex issues likely to arise for mid year amalgamation [S.64(1) of DTC]
Like ITA, demerger has to be under Companies Act Unlike ITA, only equity shares* can be issued by Resulting Co to shareholders of Demerged Co No specific provision for split of W.D.V of demerged assets. No specific provision for determination of proportionate capital allowances, etc. pertaining to demerged unit Losses transition : Comparative condition
ITA DTC
No conditions pre-post demerger No conditions prescribed though power in ITA since 1999 to ensure loss transition benefit to genuine demerger
Specific sub-section for quantification of losses pertaining to the undertaking Results in transition of business/depreciation losses
Post demerger, business continuity test to apply as in case of merger. Power of notifying further conditions taken
No specific provision for calculation of loss of undertaking Results in transition of all losses including capital/speculation losses
Losses reckoned upto the date of amalgamation, if appointed date is in the middle of the year
Complex issues likely to arise for mid year amalgamation [S.64(1) of DTC]
S. 47(1)(g)/(h) of DTC provides exemption along the lines of ITA for transfer of shares of I Co as a result of merger/demerger of two foreign companies Specific exclusion that demerger scheme need not be under Companies Act (Refer S 47(2) of DTC) S. 47(1)(g) of DTC provides exemption when transfer effected as between two foreign companies under a scheme of amalgamation
Does this contextually dilute requirement of amalgamation to be under the Companies Act ? Threshold for parity of shareholding increased from 25% to 75% Contrast with S. 47(2) of DTC which specifically excludes requirement of Cos Act compliant scheme for demerger
Can AO argue (and virtually render provisions redundant) by contending that tax protection is restricted to amalgamation/demerger between two residents ?
Page 75
Covered within the definition of amalgamation in DTC Scope extended to corporatisation of AOP/BOI also Capital gains exemption condition largely along the lines of ITA subject to the following:
Lock in period of 5 years, for 50% of value of shareholding is not a condition of tax neutrality Interestingly, sole proprietary concerns succession to a company covered separately in section 47(1)(n) of DTC and provides 5 year lock in on 51% voting parity for capital gains computation Section 47(1)(f) of DTC requires Indian Company to be a successor though, no such specific restriction in section 47(1)(n) dealing with proprietary concerns corporatisation Test of continuity of business satisfied (Refer earlier slide for details ) 50 % ownership parity continued for 5 years
Page 76
Conversion of unlisted company into LLP is tax sheltered- but, not part of Business Reorganisation Tax neutrality conditions are along the lines of ITA except, condition of continuity for 5 years of 51% stake is linked to total capital of LLP as against 51% parity of voting rights provided in ITA No specific provision for
Depreciation apportionment in the year of conversion Transition of WDV base or unamortized amount of other capital allowances Substitution of cost and holding period for capital asset, business capital asset etc.
LLP can carry forward unabsorbed business losses / unabsorbed depreciation [S. 64(1)]. No carry forward of MAT credit to LLP [S. 106(7)]. Violation of tax neutrality conditions leads to transferor company paying tax in the year of violation on
Capital gains exempted in the hands of company [S. 46(2)(c)] Forfeiture of loss claimed by LLP [S. 64(3) / (4)]
Page 77
Exemption limited to capital gains tax implication No provision for cost step up for LLP if capital gains exemption forfeited requiring transferor company to pay tax
Page 78
Page 79
Resident to pay tax on overseas income regardless of taxation in overseas jurisdiction [s. 3(4)]1
Income deemed to accrue or arise in India (including in case of non residents) defined to cover:
Business connection in India2 Any property or source of income in India Income from transfer of a capital asset situated in India2
Income of NR from activity confined to purchase of goods for export not deemed to accrue in India. Concessions contained in Explanation 1 to S. 9(1) of ITA for news agency and certain
2 Definition
Attempt seems to overrule SC decision in CIT v/s. P.V.A.L. Chettiar (267 ITR 654). See also notification issued under s.90(3) of PE has also been inserted in S.314(183).
Page 80
in India
2 Attempt
Applies to transportation charges and insurance premium in addition to interest, royalty & FTS is to dilute Ishikawajima ratio
Page 81
Accrued from non-resident if charges are in respect of carriage to or from a place in India2 Accrued from resident except where charges are in respect of carriage between places outside India3
Insurance premium including re-insurance premium accrued from or payable by any resident or non-resident in respect of insurance covering any risk in India4
See definition of transportation charges in s.314(269). Defined widely to cover cases or courier and different forms of charter contracts would cover import transaction 3 Exception may not apply where the airport or departure port of origin of departure of such carriage is in India (Refer s.5(4)(f) 4Applicable treaty may mitigate the charge
1 2 This
Page 82
FTS to cover development and transfer of a design, drawing, plan or software, or any other service of a similar nature
Royalty to cover payment for use/right to use of transmission by satellite, cable, optic fibre or similar technology, transfer of all or any rights in respect of cinematograph films & live coverage of events
Royalty & FTS of non-resident to be taxed on gross basis at 20%. Existing treaties are not overridden and may still protect the recipient. Tax withholding obligation as per beneficial DTAA except in specified cases of non furnishing of PAN Net basis of taxation if effectively connected to a Permanent Establishment (PE) As in ITA, no deemed accrual
When payment towards interest*/ royalty/ FTS is by resident for business outside India or for earning income from source outside India
When payment towards interest/ royalty/ FTS for royalty/ FTS by NR is for services utilised in a business or
profession carried on by NR outside India or earning any income from any source outside India
Page 83
F CO
Overseas India
Ind Co
Question may arise whether taxpayer can exercise any option Also, is interest expenditure claimed even if disallowed due to TDS default (versus disallowed by taxpayer voluntarily)
FCo acquires debt fund for investing in Ind Co/ granting loan to Ind Co Under the ITA, Interest taxable in India if debt used by NR for purpose of business carried on in India Source rule expanded under DTC to also include interest on debt used for earning income from any source in India. (For example, funds used by F Co for acquiring shares or FCCB / convertible debentures in Ind Co or for granting loan to Ind Co) Deemed accrual is, however, relieved if F Co (NR payer of interest) has not claimed deduction of such interest against his chargeable income in India (for example, (i) no deduction is claimed1 or allowed against dividend income, or (ii) a case of such NR being taxed on interest from Ind Co on gross basis) Monitor past concluded transactions Applicable treaty may protect the lender
Page 84
PCo
DCo
ITA position - Income accruing directly or indirectly through the transfer of capital asset situated in India is taxable DTC proposes to cover income accruing directly or indirectly, through or from, the transfer of a capital asset situated in India Controversy:
WOS
FCo1
WOS
Overseas Overseas
FCo2
Transfer of controlling or partial interest in Ind Co when shares of F Co1 are sold by one NR to another NR
India
WOS
IND Co
Page 85
Income accruing directly or indirectly through or from transfer of capital asset situated in India is a case of deemed accrual of income in India [s.5(1)(d)]
However, no accrual in India if income is from transfer outside India of share or interest in F Co 1 unless FMV1 of assets owned by F Co 12, directly or indirectly3, in India represents 50% of FMV of all assets of F Co 1 at any time in 12 months4 preceding the transfer of share or interest5 in F Co 1 [s.5(4)(g) of DTC] Is this an independent charge or is it to mitigate litigation?
If income is deemed to accrue in India under s.5(4)(g), the measure of such accrual will be
X
2 Ownership
indirectly suggests intent to cover value chain of step down subsidiaries. The Rules may provide for computation of derivative interest owned by company
4
The period is a running period of 12 months preceding the date of transfer 5 Unless relieved by the prescribed method (i.e. unless the test
is frozen w.r.t. defined date), theoretically, one needs evidence of each day/ hour valuation to make the relief effective 6 Interest may be in foreign company as partner or through some other instrument other than shares!! 7In case of business capital asset, charge may be as business income. Does this fail if there is no PE? 8Should be as on date of transfer of shares of F Co though no such specific provision
Page 86
If charge is attracted under s. 5(1)(d), the question will survive whether shares of F Co 1 is at all an asset situated in India?
Does S.5(4)(g) support that specific share or interest in F Co 1 is an asset in India only if conditions are
satisfied
Is it necessary to proceed to s.5(4)(f) if the charge fails under s. 5(1)(d) for any reason? Is s. 5(4)(f) a charging section? (But, await judgement in Vodafone case)
If company of whose shares are transferred is considered resident by virtue of POEM, would fiction of s.5(4)(f) cease to apply on the ground that company is not foreign company
Assuming the charge is attracted under s.5(1)(d) read with s.5(4)(g), would it matter that the subject matter of sale by a shareholder of F Co 1 is a small stake in F Co 1, or, that F Co 1 is a listed company or, that value of assets of F Co 1 in India was less than 50% except on the date of transfer?
Treaty may protect the seller from charge How would treaty operate if income is considered as business income from transfer of business capital asset?
Can foreign merger/ demerger involving indirect transfer of I Co shares be governed by same rules?
Page 87
Applicable to a Foreign Company (FC1 ) BPT is payable in addition to income-tax payable. There may be no BPT if tax is otherwise not payable on total income.
(i) which is branch profit; and (ii) which forms part of total income
Income from one PE can be set off against loss of other PE before calculating BPT Branch Profits is specified income included in the total income of FC. At the stage of computation of total income, all other provisions of domestic law should apply2
BPT is not payable on royalty income, etc if it is not attributable to PE At the stage of computation of total income for determining tax payable on total income, the provisions of DTAA should prevail3
1 2
But, in the matter of levy of BPT, the treaty needs to yield in favour of domestic law (s.291) BPT being Income tax, it should arguably be considered as such for tax credit in home country of FC 4
Company ceases to be a FC if it is a resident by virtue of POEM For example, if dependent agent has been remunerated at ALP, no income needs to be attributed to FC, or if there are no operations in India, no income need to be attributed to FC. There is therefore no impact on total income at the stage of computation 3 The implications as Permanent Establishment (and, hence, attribution under Article 7) will need to be seen as per DTAA (and not DTC) at the stage of computation of total income 4 FC may need to seek advice in home jurisdiction
Page 88
If charge is attracted, the charge can be on income directly or indirectly, attributable to PE1 or immovable property2 situated in India.hyuhu Tax analysis may be as under:
Normal Tax
BPT on PE
100
100 200
Income attributable to PE and included in total income Less: Income tax on such PE attributable income3 Branch profit base BPT @ 15%
100 30 70 10. 5
50
is defined in s.314(183). Refer recent Mumbai ITAT decision in the case of Linklaters for concept of income directly or indirectly attributable to PE. defined in DTC, to be understood as per general law 3 No linkage with remittance of income
1 PE
2 Not
Page 89
30
70 9.1 NA 60.9
30
70 NIL NA 75
30
70 10.5 59.5
20
80 NIL NIL 80
FTC / UTC availability in home country for DDT / BPT will impact net take home calculation.
Page 90
Expression PE has been defined in Section 314(183) of DTC PE, inter alia, includes:
Agency PE (i.e. delivery agents, order securing agents, agents with authority to conclude contracts covered)
Presence of substantial equipment in India Farm, plantation, etc Installation/ structure for exploration/ exploitation of natural resource Person acting in India for collecting premium in India or insuring risk in India
Income attributable to PE of NR in India is ordinary source income and hence net taxation at headline rate plus liable to BPT No specific exclusion for:
Page 91
A Company formed or registered outside India may be considered as resident of India by virtue of its POEM in India1
Residency if POEM, at any time in the year, in India Refer following extracts from revised Discussion Paper which reflect legislative thinking on the subject Generally, the test of residence for foreign companies is the place of effective
These observations would be of relevance for [may, arguably, control the] interpretation
Resident company has exposure to tax on global income and larger wealth base. It is liable to DDT and MAT. However, for the owner, CFC does not get triggered. 2 The test of residence for a non corporate person is linked to the place of control and management of the affairs at any time in India. We believe, central control and management is similar to the concept of POEM. Page 92
POEM - Definition
POEM has been defined in section 314(192) as under: (i) the place where the board of directors of the company or its executive directors, as the case may be, make their decisions; or (ii) in a case where the board of directors routinely approve the commercial and strategic decisions made by the executive directors or officers of the company, the place where such executive directors or officers of the company perform their functions: The second test is internationally recognised to ignite the trigger having regard to actual conduct and performance The emphasis on the Board, and the Directors / Officers, demonstrates that the parental control as shareholder is not the determinative factor.
Page 93
POEM issues
The requirement make the decisions should fairly refer to the final decision and not the pre-decision making process though, such is also a viewpoint expressed in the dictionaries In the context of Executive Directors (EDs) under clause (i) of section 314(192) :
should trigger be limited to case of ED making decisions affecting the Central Management and not when it relates to one of the divisions? Evaluate impact of presence / absence of authorization in the Articles Evaluate impact of supervision by the Board Should the terms executive director and officers be construed as per Companies Act? Impact of presence of directors or officers in different jurisdictions?
Do widening of residency test, introduction of GAAR, tightening of TP Regulations dilute requirement of introduction of CFC?
Page 94
POEM - Cautions
It may be risky to hold a board meeting in India, given that POEM at any time of the year may result in the residence of a company It is advisable to hold physical meetings in the location of desired residency; conference calls may advisedly be avoided It is absolutely advisable that the decisions of the Board at such meeting are well debated from all business and strategic angles and there is evidence to support democratic process of taking decisions
Page 95
Unilateral FTC is provided in terms of S. 207 of DTC 10 It is available to resident. DTC 2010 makes it comparable to ITA and restricts it to a resident. DTC 09 had provided for relief to every person Ordinary FTC is available in respect of income accruing outside India. The credit is available in respect of income from any overseas country or specified territory. 207(3) seems to be a clarificatory provision. It clarifies that FTC will not exceed Indian Tax payable in respect of overseas income as also overall tax liability of the assessee.
The right to prescribe mode and manner of FTC is provided for (may have rules surrounding CFC also)
Page 96
Transfer pricing
Determination of arms length price (ALP) similar to that existing under the current rules Safe Harbour rules to be framed by the Board for determination of ALP
Presently such provision subsists only for sale of goods manufactured, processed etc by AEs
Clause (xiv): If any of the enterprises to the transaction are situated in any specific or distinct location which may be prescribed1
Transfer pricing
ALP definition is modified and now reads as under [Section 124(2)]: arms length price means a price which is applied, or proposed to be applied, in a transaction between persons, enterprises or undertakings, other than associated enterprises, in uncontrolled, unrelated or independent conditions
Page 98
Transfer pricing
Board empowered to enter into Advance Pricing Agreements (APA) in respect of determination of ALP. APA can be valid for a period not exceeding five consecutive FYs. Not binding in case of change of law and change in basis. APA is single track, binding only on applicant in India.
Page 99
Application of anti-avoidance principles emerging from judicial decisions (i.e. judgemade law) Enactment of General Anti-avoidance Rules (GAAR)
A broad rule that has the effect of invalidating an arrangement that has been entered into by a taxpayer for the purpose of obtaining a tax benefit.
Thin Capitalization
Exit Taxes
Page 100
Tax planning is legitimate provided it is within the framework of law A tax-saving motive does not justify the taxing authorities or the courts to nullify or disregard otherwise proper and bonafide transaction An act which is otherwise valid in law cannot be treated as non-est by looking at underlying tax saving motive or by suggesting economic detriment or prejudice to the national interests It would not be permissible for the Court to treat the intervening legal steps as non-est based upon some hypothetical assessment of the real motive
Page 101
Law does not oblige a trader to make the maximum profit that he can. Income which he could have, but has not been earned, is not taxable.
Page 102
Relevant extracts from M/s Walfort Share & Stock Brokers Pvt Ltd1
The fact that the dividend received was tax-free is the position recognized under Section 10(33) of the Act. The assessee had made use of the said provision of the Act. That such use cannot be called "abuse of law". Even assuming that the transaction was pre-planned there is nothing to impeach the genuineness of the transaction. With regard to the ruling in McDowell & Co. Ltd. v. Commercial Tax Officer [154 ITR 148(SC)] = (2002-TIOL-40-SC-CT), it may be stated that in the later decision of this Court in Union of India v. Azadi Bachao Andolan [263 ITR 706(SC)] = (2003-TIOL-13-SC-IT) it has been held that a citizen is free to carry on its business within the four corners of the law. That, mere tax planning, without any motive to evade taxes through colourable devices is not frowned upon even by the judgment of this Court in McDowell & Co. Ltd's case (supra).
2010-TIOL-47-SC-IT
Page 103
In the past, the response to tax avoidance has been the introduction of legislative amendments to deal with specific instances of tax avoidance. Since the liberalization of the Indian economy, increasingly sophisticated forms of tax avoidance are being adopted by the taxpayers and their advisers. The problem has been further compounded by tax avoidance arrangements spanning across several tax jurisdictions. This has led to severe erosion of the tax base. Further, appellate authorities and courts have been placing a heavy onus on the Revenue when dealing with matters of tax avoidance even though the relevant facts are in the exclusive knowledge of the taxpayer and he chooses not to reveal them. In view of the above, it is necessary and desirable to introduce a general anti avoidance rule which will serve as a deterrent against such practices. This is also consistent with the international trend.
CBDT to issue guidelines to provide circumstances when GAAR may be invoked [refer s. 123(2)/ (3) of DTC] To be invoked only where tax avoidance is beyond a specified threshold limit DRP available where GAAR is invoked
Page 104
DTC : GAAR
Codification of anti-abuse rules in DTC which permit declaration of an arrangement as an impermissible avoidance arrangement Main purpose of the arrangement should be to obtain a tax benefit and it
Is not for bona fide business purpose Creates rights and obligations which would not normally be created between persons dealing at ALP Results, directly or indirectly, in the misuse or abuse of the provisions of DTC Lacks commercial substance in whole or in part
Presumption of purpose
Burden of proof on taxpayer to establish that tax benefit was not the main purpose
Page 105
DTC : GAAR
A reduction, avoidance or deferral of tax Increase in refund of tax Reduction, avoidance or deferral of tax that would be payable under the DTC but for a tax treaty
An increase in refund of tax under the DTC as a result of a tax treaty A reduction in tax bases including increase in loss
The arrangement for this purpose is defined exhaustively to mean any step in, or a part or whole of, any transaction, operation, scheme, agreement or understanding, whether enforceable or not, and includes any of the foregoing
Page 106
DTC : GAAR
Arrangement includes or involves round trip financing and includes round tripping.
with regard to the funds other than the original funds; intermediate transaction to which the round tripped funds can be traced;
presence of accommodating and tax indifferent party. Elements which offset or cancel each other. where the legal substance of the whole of the arrangement differs from individual step.
Page 107
DTC : GAAR
Treating impermissible avoidance arrangement as if it had not been carried out or in such other manner
Disregard any accommodating party or treating accommodating party and any other party as one and the same person
Deem persons who are connected to be one and the same person Recharacterize or re-allocate income Recharacterize debt financing as equity or vice versa
Implications/ concerns
Are SAARs and toning up of TP provisions sufficient safeguard? Promotes uncertainty and has scope for litigation Burden of proof is put wholly on the taxpayer Places significant discretionary powers with the Commissioner
Page 108
Tax treaties
Preferential treatment for Treaty law over domestic tax law In case of conflict between Treaty law and domestic tax law, taxpayer can choose the more beneficial provision
CFC impacts residence and treaty may not relieve the charge
Page 109
Interpretation issues:
Does there exist any scope for challenge, given, in particular, the express
legislative intent?
Will the anti-abuse rules and BPT apply even to prior tax treaties? What if existing tax treaty has narrower anti-abuse provision?
Page 110
The enactment of domestic legislation intended by the Legislature to have effects in clear contradistinction to international treaty obligations
Article 26 every treaty in force is binding upon the parties to it and must be performed by them in good faith Article 27 - internal law cannot serve as justification for non-compliance with treaty
obligation
Treaty overrides violate international law, although they may still be binding as a matter of domestic law
Constitution of India
State Directive Principle : India shall endeavor to foster respect for international law and treaty obligations
Page 111
In most countries, tax treaties have a status superior to that of ordinary domestic laws (e.g. France, Germany, the Netherlands)
lex posterior generalis non derogate legi priori speciali (a subsequent general law does
not override a prior special law)
In some countries (primarily the US, but also to some extent the UK and Australia) treaties can be changed by subsequent domestic legislation
lex posterior derogate legi priori (a subsequent law overrides a prior law)
IRC Sec. 7852(d): for purposes of determining the relationship between a provision of a treaty and any law of the United States affecting revenue, neither the treaty nor the law shall have preferential status by reason of its being a treaty or law - Identical language used in
DTC!
Senate Report: A treaty will not be deemed to have been abrogated or modified by a later statute unless such purpose on the part of Congress has been clearly expressed
Page 112
MAT provisions
Page 113
MAT continues to be payable by a company on book profit 1. Controversy on applicability to foreign company will continue. MAT rate is increased to 20% from 18%2 MAT is a likely huge burden on companies enjoying investment linked incentive (being the companies who will need to maintain their accounts under Schedule VI as per applicable accounting standards). There is no protection extended to SEZ developers and SEZ units who hitherto availed immunity from MAT under section 115JB(6)3 of ITA Tonnage tax companies are exempted from MAT on book profit / loss derived from core shipping activities. [Refer para (12) of the Tenth Schedule]
1. The concept of book profit is largely the same as in ITA. 2. Effectively 19.93% inclusive of surcharge and cess 3. Taxpayer may need to explore legal advice on the question whether SEZ Act may still have overriding impact.
Page 114
MAT credit carry forward extended to 15 years from existing limit of 10 years. S. 106 has a specific provision offering MAT credit advantage in respect of tax paid under this section making it litigation prone to carry forward MAT credit outstanding on the transition date. No specific grandfathering provision for MAT credit accumulated under ITA4.
Income of Controlled Foreign Company (CFC) may be included in total income of a resident company in year 1. Fairly, actual dividend receipt from CFC in year 3 should not form part of total income (and, hence, should not be part of book profit either. Section 17(i) r.w section 59(c) of DTC may support
this 5).
4. Implications of repeal provisions and General Clauses Act will need to be examined for claiming the credit. Explore also if such companies can extend the credit period to 15 years. 5. This is likely to be litigative. It is hence desirable that there is a specific legislative clarification to eliminate double taxation.
Page 115
Expenditure on wealth tax (which was hitherto deductible in the computation of book profit) will not be admissible under DTC There is no clarity on whether amount credited to P&L account by transfer from the provision/reserve which was added back in the computation of book profit under ITA will be allowed to be reduced under section 104(2)
Litigation may ensue on the ground that such amount was not taken into account in the computation of book profit under DTC
Profits of sick company continue to be out of MAT till net worth becomes positive
Definition of net worth borrowed in ITA from Sick Industrial Companies Act (SICA), has been omitted in DTC
As per SICA, reserves which are not free reserves (say, capital reserve) are not considered as part of net worth. The position may differ with the omission of reference to SICA
Like ITA, specific clarificatory provision to deny MAT credit to successor LLP in the event of conversion of a company into LLP Like ITA, specific provision that no interest is payable on amount of MAT credit awaiting set off
Page 116
Page 117
Continues to apply to a domestic company (being a company resident in India)2 @ 15% of the amount declared, distributed, paid Deemed dividend income in the nature of loan or advance by specified CHC continues to be chargeable as income of the beneficiary of loan / advance and is not subject to DDT One tier exemption is liberalized. The exemption from tax is now available in respect of distribution out of receipt of DDT paid dividend income from a subsidiary even if the distributing company is a subsidiary of another company. Deemed dividend excludes distribution on liquidation / reduction in favour of shareholder who is not entitled to participate in surplus in company assets, even if shares were not issued to him for full cash consideration Under ITA, SEZ Developers are excluded from DDT. The benefit is not extended under DTC3
1 Income 2 By
distribution tax payable by MF or insurance company is captured in sector specific slides. virtue of POEM, a foreign company may be considered as a resident and hence a domestic company. 3 Legal advice may be obtained to explore the impact, if any, of SEZ Act override.
Page 118
Under ITA, SEZ Developers are excluded from DDT. The benefit is not extended under DTC3
Time frame for payment of DDT : 14 days from the relevant date. Unlike ITA, the residual head of income excludes dividend income from purview of the head provided DDT has been paid under section 109.
The expression paid has been defined to mean actually paid. Default of payment of DDT may, therefore, have consequences for the shareholders4.
Delay triggers interest @ 1% p.m. Default of non payment makes company an Assessee in Default liable for payment of principal sum.
3 Legal 4
advice may be obtained to explore the impact, if any, of SEZ Act override. See separate slides for implications of the language employed in the residuary head as also in the schedule of TDS rates.
Page 119
Page 120
ITA section 10 (33) exempts dividend income referred to in S.115- O. S.194 & S.195 of ITA relieves tax withholding obligation in respect of dividend referred to in S.115-O. DTC, 2010 excludes dividend from the computation of income as per item 19 of VI schedule as follows: Income not included in total income
Any dividend declared, distributed or paid to a company or to a non resident in respect of which dividend distribution tax has been paid under S.109
DTC 2010 relieves TDS obligation provided DDT has been paid under S.109 (Schedule III and Schedule IV) Similar provision appears for income distributed by MF
The word paid has been defined in S.314(178) as under: (a) in relation to Income from business or Income from residuary sources, means incurred or actually paid, according to the method of accounting on the basis of which the income under those heads are computed; and (b) in all other cases, mean actually paid;
Page 121
Will TDS obligation be attracted at the stage of declaration or distribution on the basis that DDT liability has been incurred, but, not actually paid? Dividend income is chargeable as residuary income except in a case where DDT has been paid? Is there scope for litigation in the assessment of shareholder if DDT has not been paid by the company? Rationale for limiting clause 19 of Schedule VI to a company or non resident Payment of dividends by holding company after taking benefit of on tier exemption while discharging DDT liability Payment of dividends by VCC to its investors which is exempted from DDT2
ITA specifically exempts VCC from withholding obligation but DTC does not
Page 122
Page 123
ITA refers to WHC as a company in which public are substantially interested. DTC formally introduces definitions of WHC and a Closely Held Company (CHC) The status as CHC may have impact: Taxation of loan as deemed dividend, Carry forward of loss, chargeability of income under residuary head1 [Section 58(2)(j)] of DTC 10 Section 200 (A)(c)2, grants relief from tax withholding obligation when bonds are issued by a WHC
There is no separate entry in S. 314(293) dealing with a listed company. But, a public company as per section 3 of Companies Act is, by its status, considered to be WHC. [Refer S. 314(293)(f) Significant scope expansion of WHC compared to ITA No attached conditions as to ownership pattern or listing etc Issue may arise w.r.t status of a subsidiary of a public company which is public company in terms of section 3(1)(iv) of Companies Act
1 Along 2.Along
the lines of section 56(2)(viia) of ITA the lines of section 193(v) of ITA Page 124
Definition of deemed dividend under DTC includes payment by a CHC if such payment is:
Advance or loan to a shareholder being the beneficial owner holding 10% of voting power Advance or loan to a concern in which such shareholder holds substantial interest (> 20%) Payments on behalf of or for individual benefit of such shareholder An individual with his relative holds 20% voting power / income Any other person holds 20% voting power / income
Definition of relative widened beyond the scope presently available. The lineal descendant of a brother / sister of individual or spouse is also a relative. This tightens the scope in case of CHC. Under DTC, distribution of accumulated profit by a company upon liquidation or reduction of capital in favour of shareholders not entitled to participate in surplus assets, will not constitute dividend regardless of whether the shares were or were not issued for full cash consideration
Page 125
Page 126
Withholding rates for payments to contractors specified at uniform rate of 2% for all deductees. ITA carves out distinct rates for
Scope of withholding on contract payments expanded to service contracts. Service contract defined inclusively to include a contract
TDS obligation restricted to cover specified streams of income Proposed expansive coverage of withholding @ 10% for any other
Page 127
Having regard to provision of s.195(4) of DTC treaty provision can be considered for the purposes of effecting TDS except when payee does, not have PAN Salary TDS is provided along the lines of section 192 and permits TDS rate reckoning with reference to average rate of income tax Royalty / FTS attracts TDS @20% whether or not related to PE, and, whether or not from Indian concern Residuary entry (8) in Schedule IV attracts 30% charge by a specific mention that the obligation in respect of sum chargeable to tax Is condition of chargeability required to be provided specifically for other earlier entries enlisted in the schedule? Can the pre-requisite of chargeability be presumed in absence of specific mention? Exemption in ITA for Offshore Banking Units located in SEZ from withholding tax on interest on deposits placed or borrowings made from non-residents omitted in DTC. These units will need to withhold tax as per specified/DTAA rates Payment of interest to foreign banks to whom Banking Regulation Act applies3 will be exempted from withholding Withholding rate on interest on FCCB/FCEB and bonds of PSEs sold by Government enhanced to 20% as against 10% in ITA
Issue may arise whether the exemption will be restricted to Indian branches only or once Indian branch is established, Banking Regulation Act applies to overseas branches and HO also
Page 128
The provision of DTC corresponding to S.206AA of ITA makes it clear that the provision does not apply if the deductee is not required to obtain PAN. The conditions and requirements under which PAN needs to be obtained will be prescribed by rules under DTC.
Incidentally, under ITA regime, Rule 114C exempts non-residents from obtaining PAN.
Provisions for self declaration for NIL DTC omitted. Deductee will necessarily need to obtain lower or NIL withholding certificate from Tax Authority.
Incidentally, DTC 09 did not permit issue of lower withholding certificate. This has been restored in DTC 10. (Refer S.197 / 195(2) of ITA)
Employee can declare additional income from any other employer for higher TDS. Other income (including losses) cannot be considered by employer
TCS rates aligned to uniform rate of 3% instead of differential rates of 1% -5% under ITA
Page 129
Page 130
Provisions are substantially along the lines of ITA Like in ITA, limitation period is 4 years
Provisions largely along the lines of ITA. Significant deviations in DTC are:
Concept of assessment year discarded. Income computation and assessment are for financial year. Common return of tax base for Income tax, Wealth tax, DDT and BPT Due date for submission of return 2
Non- corporate taxpayers not having business income-30th June Others (including tax audit cases and all companies) 31st August.
Delayed filing of return will result in lapsing of losses (including depreciation losses) of relevant year.
1 2
This presentation has largely restricted itself to changes compared to ITA TP Audit Report to be separately furnished to TPO by due date.
Page 132
Power of A.O to call for records of earlier years in scrutiny assessment enhanced to 6 years. [3 years in ITA]
Time limit of 6 months introduced for Valuation Officer to submit report to A.O.
Page 133
DTC provisions largely along the lines of ITA with following deviation DRP mechanism widened. In addition to cases where there is TP adjustment
Assessment based on GAAR order Any class or classes of persons as may be prescribed
This presentation has largely restricted itself to changes compared to ITA 2. DTC (09) had proposed condition of minimum variation to total income in scrutiny assessment of an amount 2.5 M in every taxpayers case as criteria to approach DRP .That proposal has been dropped. 3.CBDT Circular dated 20 January 2010 provided option to avail conventional remedy to file appeal to CIT(A) as an alternative to DRP
Page 134
Provisions are largely along the lines of ITA Significant deviation in DTC are:
Assessment not in accordance with CBDT order, direction, instruction or Circular 2. Assessment not made in accordance with order, direction, instruction or circular of authority superior to the A.O issued before making of the assessment. Objection or observations in report of CAG on correctness of assessment of the taxpayer 3. Reopening notice can be issued within seven years from the end of relevant F.Y 4 in all cases including search cases regardless of whether original assessment was a scrutiny assessment.
This presentation has largely restricted itself to changes compared to ITA CBDT circular should be available prior to the date of order and should be indisputably applicable to the facts of the case 3 Fairly, it should be with respect to taxpayer specific 4 ITA provides limitation period of 6 years from the end of the relevant assessment year. DTC provision matches with ITA
2 Fairly
Page 135
Deemed rejection of rectification application on expiry of 6 months triggers right to Appeal Remand to AO by CIT(A) possible only on new question of fact or law Power of condonation of delay restricted to one year of delay Subject to above, provisions are largely along the lines of ITA Unlike DTC 2009, no Appeal to CIT(A) may lie against stay rejection order.
Appeal against order of A.O. pursuant to CITs revision order will lie to ITAT. In the case of Public sector company appeal to lie before AAR [and, cannot be to ITAT] against order of CIT(A) or CIT Revision2.
2 In relation to DRP directed order of A.O, DTC provides option to approach either ITAT or approach AAR. [Refer, S.183(1)(e) r.w. S.183(3) and S.256(4) / (5)] Page 137
Order prejudicial to the revenue1. Order deemed to be erroneous: if passed without making inquiries or verification. Allowing relief without probing into the claim. Order not in accordance with CBDTs directions or instructions. Order not as per decision of appellate tribunal or Court in case of taxpayer or other person under tax laws or under any other law. SLP admitted by SC against favourable order of jurisdiction HC followed by A.O Order not erroneous if it holds one of the two views sustainable in law. CIT can direct enhancement or modification but cannot set side or cancel an assessment. Matter before CIT(A), or concluded by CIT(A) not to be revised. Likewise, order considered by and passed in pursuance of direction of DRP2 cannot be revised. Appeal to now lie to ITAT against A.O order giving affect to CIT Revision order. Provisions dealing with revisional orders favourable to taxpayer are similar to those in ITA.
1 2
In substitution of Section 263 of ITA. The conditions which exclude the power of revision appear to be cumulative. Page 138
Search assessment
Reassessment
Excluded
Covered3
1.This presentation has largely restricted itself to changes compared to ITA 2.In DTC, entry is barred in cases of assessment or reassessment where prosecution proceeding initiated . 3.Issuance of notice for reopening of assessment should be considered as pendency of assessment. Page 139
ITA No such requirement No Rs. 5M for search cases. Rs. 1M for other Only one time opportunity in all cases Required Yes Same Same
DTC
Complexity of investigation Is filing return mandatory? Minimum additional income tax (refer foot notes 4 and 5 )
3 Bar on subsequent
If there has been no search till date or if incriminating material found in a search on another, there seems no restriction. Otherwise, only one time opportunity. If earlier search was under ITA regime, perhaps, no restriction Minor time limit changes
4. For wealth tax, there is no requirement of minimum additional tax liability. 5 . Tax to be paid before the date of application. Under DTC, as between payment of income tax or payment of wealth tax, compliance of any one of them should meet with the condition
Page 140
the slide dealing with Appellate power. Entry of PSC to ITAT has been barred in certain cases. controversy could arise whether matters pending before ITAT may continue to be governed by ITA. Fresh appeals furnished after introduction of DTC, 10 may lie to the Authority. There is no clarity on the applicable law should PSC cease to be PSC at some stage. 3 The word Chairperson substituted for the word Chairman 4 It is not clear whether this provides scope to Commissioner to appeal against his own order of revision
Page 141
Penalty
Page 142
Levy of penalty if there is under reporting of tax base. Under reporting presumed in a case of:
Non filing of return Assessment of income over income disclosed in return. Any disallowance or addition in the assessment / reassessment.
Penalty levy = 100% / 200% of tax payable on additions or disallowances made. Tax payable is determined at rates specified in First Schedule/Second Schedule. Exposure to penalty for additions made by CIT in revisional proceedings and CIT(A) in appellate proceedings.
Page 143
Furnishing bonafide explanation with disclosure of facts. If addition is based on estimate after rejection of method of accounting.
If addition is due to variation in estimate of disallowance / addition offered also by the taxpayer in return.
Page 144
In search cases, provisions for penalty are largely along the line of ITA
Penalty leviable as per status on date of search
Earlier F.Y
Penalty @ 10% if UDI is admitted in search, substantiated the manner& taxes paid
Penalty 20% if UDI is not admitted in search but is declared in return and taxes paid
Penalty @ 100% /200% if UDI not admitted in search nor declared in return
Page 145
Penalties for various defaults consolidated in one section. By and large, list of defaults is same as per ITA. As in ITA, no penalty leviable when there is reasonable cause. As against fixed quantum of penalty under existing ITA; DTC provides range of minimum & maximum penalty leviable. E.g.
Penalty for non obtaining Tax audit or TP audit report, minimum: Rs. 50,000/- & maximum Rs. 2 Lac. [against Rs. 1Lac in ITA] Non obtaining or non quoting PAN, minimum : Rs.5,000 & maximum Rs.1 Lac [against Rs. 10,000/- in ITA]. Acceptance or repayment of loan or deposit in an amount exceeding Rs.50,000 otherwise than by account payee cheque [Penalty equal to amount of loan or deposit]
Page 146
Penalty procedure
Show cause notice to impose concealment penalty to be issued during pendency of proceedings for relevant financial year.
Order imposing penalty to be passed within one year from end of financial year in which show cause was issued.
Page 147
Page 148
Profession
Business
15L
60L
25L
100L
Books of accounts for persons in business include cash book, ledger, register of daily inventory of business trading asset. Bills or receipts in value exceeding Rs. 200/- should carry name, address & other prescribed particulars. Specific exemption relief from obligation to tax audit has been provided in certain cases of presumptive taxation (E.g., approved turnkey power projects, services / facilities for prospecting production, etc. of mineral oil, shipping companies, aircraft companies). No specific exemption to presumptive taxation cases from obligation to maintain books of account or from maintaining details of international transactions. TP audit report to be furnished to TPO. ITA requires report to be furnished to A.O
Page 149
Wealth tax
Page 150
Wealth Tax
Particulars WTA DTC 10
Taxpayers covered
Available
Available
Assets held by spouse, minor child, revocable trust, etc and converted HUF property
Page 151
Wealth Tax
Particulars WTA DTC 10
Specified assets
Urban land, building All existing specified assets 3 plus following additional (including farm house assets :located within 25 kms Helicopter of any municipality or Archaeological collections, drawings, paintings, sculptures, or Cantonment Board), any other work of art 4 motor cars, jewellery & Watch having value in excess of Rs. 50,000/- 4 bullion, yachts, boats, aircrafts and cash in Deposits located in bank located outside India in case of hand 2 individuals and HUFs (even if recorded in books of account)
Deposits located in bank located outside India in case of other persons only if not recorded in books of account. [Does not however include units of overseas mutual fund / debentures of F Co. and shares of F Co. which is not CFC]. Any interest in a foreign trust or any other body located outside India (whether incorporated or not) other than a foreign company Any equity or preference share held by a resident in a controlled foreign company (as referred to in the Twentieth Schedule)
2 Cash in hand in excess of Rs. 50,000 in hands of individuals/HUFs and unrecorded cash in hands of others 3.Threshold for cash in hand for individuals/HUFS enhanced to Rs. 2 lakhs and not chargeable in hands of others 4.Whether held as capital asset or stock in trade
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Deemed ownership
WTA Building allotted or leased by co-operative society, company or AOP to its members Holder of impartible estate deemed individual owner of all properties comprised in the estate Possession of building under part performance of contract under TP Act Omitted for wealth tax purposes but retained for house property income taxation purposes. Hence, legal owner may need to check wealth tax while economic owner will enjoy the property Omitted for both wealth tax and house property income tax purposes. But, wealth tax exemption available for lessor if house let out for 300 days in a FY. DTC 10 These provisions continue in present form
Page 156
Financial assets
Financial assets (including shares in a company whether equity or preference, and whether, of Indian or foreign company) are ordinarily not liable to WT. Other financial assets like insurance policies, bonds, debentures, bank deposits etc, are also not liable for WT. Following are plausible exceptions which create tax exposure
Interest in foreign trust or any other body7 located outside India (whether incorporated or not) for both residents and non-residents 8
Properties owned by the trust/body may not necessarily be specified assets Interest in a discretionary trust is not identifiable, but a discretionary trust is a taxable entity If both trust and beneficiaries are resident in India, whether double taxation can arise 9?
7.Not being a foreign company 8. Whether non-residents protected by exclusion for assets located outside India if assets of trust are also located outside India? 9. S.17 of DTC protects double taxation of income only and not net wealth or tax base
Page 157
Unlike WTA, there is no specific exemption for specified assets located outside India granted to :
An expatriate who turns resident in India may have tax exposure10 in respect of all specified assets located outside India (including bank deposits, interest in foreign trust or body, immovable properties, motor cars, cash in hand, jewellery, paintings, etc) All non-residents (including foreign companies) exposed to widened scope of chargeable assets in India like archaeological collections, paintings, watches, etc All non-residents can claim exclusion with regard to assets located11outside India.
10. He can explore treaty protection 11. Old WT Circular of 1957, inter alia, clarifies that (a) tangible movable property is located in India if such property is located in India or if it is in transit to India and (b) ships or aircrafts are located in India if they are registered in India
Page 158
Page 159