Genießen Sie von Millionen von eBooks, Hörbüchern, Zeitschriften und mehr - mit einer kostenlosen Testversion

Nur $11.99/Monat nach der Testversion. Jederzeit kündbar.

Enhanced Relations - Protracted Conflict(s)?: The EU's Non-Recognition and Engagement Policy (NREP) towards Abkhazia and South Ossetia in Georgia
Finding a Cue through "Q": Applying Q-Methodology to Compare German and U.S. Diplomats' Attitudes towards U.N. Security Council Reform
eBook-Reihen2 Titel

Wissenschaftliche Beiträge aus dem Tectum Verlag: Politikwissenschaften

Bewertung: 0 von 5 Sternen

()

Über diese Serie

Protracted conflicts with and over de facto independent entities such as the Abkhazia and South Ossetia/Tskhinvali region in Georgia endanger the region's sustainable and peaceful development. Anna Steiner examines Georgia's breakaway regions in the context of EU policies – a highly topical, yet unresolved matter.
Relations between Georgia and the EU have significantly deepened within the last ten years (Association Agreement, DCFTA, Visa Liberalisation). The present book closes a scientific gap by reviewing the NREP in the light of these developments. Using a profound literature basis and expert interviews, the authorsheds light on EU-Russian relations, the politico-normative framework of EU-Georgian relations, neighbourhood relations and applicable governance concepts. Realistic proposals for a future EU approach make this book a guideline for diplomatic engage­ment.
SpracheDeutsch
Erscheinungsdatum15. Apr. 2019
Enhanced Relations - Protracted Conflict(s)?: The EU's Non-Recognition and Engagement Policy (NREP) towards Abkhazia and South Ossetia in Georgia
Finding a Cue through "Q": Applying Q-Methodology to Compare German and U.S. Diplomats' Attitudes towards U.N. Security Council Reform

Titel in dieser Serie (2)

  • Finding a Cue through "Q": Applying Q-Methodology to Compare German and U.S. Diplomats' Attitudes towards U.N. Security Council Reform
    Finding a Cue through "Q": Applying Q-Methodology to Compare German and U.S. Diplomats' Attitudes towards U.N. Security Council Reform
    Finding a Cue through "Q": Applying Q-Methodology to Compare German and U.S. Diplomats' Attitudes towards U.N. Security Council Reform

    United Nations Security Council reform has been hotly debated since the end of the Cold War, which unleashed a global geopolitical realignment. But since 2007, the push to update the Security Council to reflect the power-sharing realities of our modern age – giving for example Germany a seat on the coveted panel – has largely stalled. Finding a Cue through "Q" chronicles the history, key initiatives and major players in this important discussion, while focusing on U.S. and German involvement on the council, and reboots the debate through political discourse analysis and intensive Q-methodology. Diplomats from Germany and the United States were asked to rank their agreement with statements made by stakeholders from government, business, academia and media in both countries. Instead of presenting a priori categories and foregone conclusions, this method describes the parameters of the debate through typologies derived from fresh diplomatic assessments. Social perspective narratives were created from the results, leading to the surfacing of two dominant discourses: Convinced Institutionalism and Cautious Institutionalism. Andreas Schwenk's innovative approach provides new insight into the thinking of German and U.S. diplomats, and offers a valuable contribution to overcoming the stalemate. "Considering the growing number of attacks on multilateralism, Mr. Schwenk's meticulous study clearly illustrates the need for reform of what is designed to be the world's pivotal multilateral organization. A lack of reform of the U.N. Security Council might lead to future challenges to its primacy. It was my great pleasure to contribute to this fascinating book." Doris Hertrampf, German Ambassador (Ret.) "I enjoyed participating in Mr. Schwenk's rigorous and systematic study of the vexed issue of U.N. Security Council reform. His analysis demonstrates broad commitment to keeping the Security Council effective, while the diversity of views confirms that changes to the number, regional distribution, or powers of its members will continue to be difficult." William B. Wood, U.S. Ambassador (Ret.)

  • Enhanced Relations - Protracted Conflict(s)?: The EU's Non-Recognition and Engagement Policy (NREP) towards Abkhazia and South Ossetia in Georgia
    Enhanced Relations - Protracted Conflict(s)?: The EU's Non-Recognition and Engagement Policy (NREP) towards Abkhazia and South Ossetia in Georgia
    Enhanced Relations - Protracted Conflict(s)?: The EU's Non-Recognition and Engagement Policy (NREP) towards Abkhazia and South Ossetia in Georgia

    Protracted conflicts with and over de facto independent entities such as the Abkhazia and South Ossetia/Tskhinvali region in Georgia endanger the region's sustainable and peaceful development. Anna Steiner examines Georgia's breakaway regions in the context of EU policies – a highly topical, yet unresolved matter. Relations between Georgia and the EU have significantly deepened within the last ten years (Association Agreement, DCFTA, Visa Liberalisation). The present book closes a scientific gap by reviewing the NREP in the light of these developments. Using a profound literature basis and expert interviews, the authorsheds light on EU-Russian relations, the politico-normative framework of EU-Georgian relations, neighbourhood relations and applicable governance concepts. Realistic proposals for a future EU approach make this book a guideline for diplomatic engage­ment.

Ähnlich wie Wissenschaftliche Beiträge aus dem Tectum Verlag

Ähnliche E-Books

Verwandte Kategorien

Rezensionen für Wissenschaftliche Beiträge aus dem Tectum Verlag

Bewertung: 0 von 5 Sternen
0 Bewertungen

0 Bewertungen0 Rezensionen

Wie hat es Ihnen gefallen?

Zum Bewerten, tippen

Die Rezension muss mindestens 10 Wörter umfassen