Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
In Vitro: Skinethic Laboratories, A Company Devoted To Develop and Produce Alternative Methods To Animal Use
In Vitro: Skinethic Laboratories, A Company Devoted To Develop and Produce Alternative Methods To Animal Use
--~--------------------------
1 Who is SkinEthic Laboratories? able and robust in vitro alternative meth- This cumulative experience of more than
ods to animal use in cosmetic, chemical 20 years in tissue engineering allows us
SkinEthic Laboratories is a biotechnol- and pharmaceutical industries. SkinEthic to provide a unique range of in vitro alter-
ogy company based in France. SkinEthic Laboratories is an affiliated company of native methods based on 3D recon-
is devoted to develop and produce reli- Episkin SNC, part of L'Oreal Research. structed skin and epithelial models to
scientists from the industrial and aca-
Lecture held in Chennai 29th - 31 st Jannuary 2007 demic communities.
3.2 Reconstructed human Fig. 4: Reconstructed human epidermis (RHE). The reconstructed epidermis (right) is
epidermis (RHE) very similar to human epidermis.
The human epidermis is reconstructed
from normal keratinocytes cultured on an
inert polycarbonate filter at the air-liquid
interface in a chemically defined medium
(see Fig. 4a and 4b).
This epidermis expresses the major dif-
ferentiation markers (filaggrin and
involucrin in granular cell layers, transg-
lutaminase 1 and keratin 10 in supra basal
layers and loricrin in upper granular lay- Fig. 5: Reconstructed human epidermis (RHE). Detection of the epidermal markers
ers), and expresses the basal membrane keratin 10 (Ieft) and filaggrin (right).
markers (type IV collagen, integrin alpha
6, integrin beta 4, antigen BP, laminin 1
and larninin 5). Free fatty acids and
ceramides are detected in the lipid profile.
The ultrastructural features show secre-
tion and normal arrangement of bilayered
lipids in the intracellular spaces of the
cornified celllayers (see Fig. 5a and Sb).
The RHE, a validated model for
screening for skin corrosion (under
OECD TG 431 guidelines), is under vali- Fig. 6: Reconstructed human cornea I epithelium (HCE). In vitro (semi-thin, left)
dation for skin irritation and is a useful and in vitro (light microscopy, right).
tool for screening for acute and chronic
skin irritation of topical formulations and
for phototoxicity testing of raw materials
or finished products. The RHE model can
also be a useful model for understanding
epidermal differentiation, the effects of
UVA and UVB irradiation as well as Fig. 7: Reconstructed human cornea I epithelium (HCE). The HCE model expresses
UVB protection, for ranking epidermal keratin (Ieft) and CD 44 (right).
permeability and metabolism of tested
compounds or forrnulations, for perform-
ing the retinoid activity test and detecting The morphological features show the their impact on mucin production.
genornic and transcriptornic signatures. typical presence of a columnar basal cell References concerning HCE are: Van
References concerning RHE are: layer, 2-3 layers of transition al wing Goethem et al. , 2006 ; Doucet et al. ,
Kandarova et al., 2006a ; Kandarova et cells, and 2-3 layers of superficial squa- 2006; Nguyen et al., 2003.
al., 2006b; Tornier et al., 2006 ; de mous cells.
Brugerolle et al, 1999. The HCE secretes the same mucins that
are found in the human cornea in vivo and 4 Skin Models
3.3 Reconstructed human expresses CD44 and keratin (see Fig. 7a
cornea I epithelium (HCE) and 7b). 4.1 Realskin a full thickness
When cultivated at the air-liquid inter- This reproducible, in vitro tissue model skin model
face, in a chernically defined medium, the allows prediction of ocular irritation (in Realskin is an in vitro reconstructed
transformed cellline HCE reconstructs a pre-validation phase by ECVAM) of raw human epidermis from normal human
corneal epithelial tissue similar to the materials and formulations, ranking of keratinocytes cultured on a lattice of col-
corneal mucosa of the human eye (see permeability and metabolism of tested lagen populated with normal human
Fig. 6a and 6b). compounds or formulations as well as fibroblasts at the air-liquid interface.
et a1. (2005). The in vitro acute skin evaluated in the ECVAM skin irritation Straube, F., Junker, U., Kretz, S. et al.
irritation of chemicals: optimisation of validation study. ATlA 34, 393-406. (2006). Melanocyte containing human
the Episkin prediction model within the Kandarova, H., Liebsch, M., Spielmann, organotypic epidermis as a model to
framework of the ECVAM validation H. et al. (2006). Assessment of the evaluate toxicity of melanin binding
process. ATlA 33, 329-349. SkinEthic RHE model for in vitro skin substances. Society of Toxicology,
de Brugerolle de Fraissinette, A., corrosion testing of chemieals accord- USA, March 2006.
Picarles, v., Rosdy, M. et a1. (1999). ing to the new OECD TG 341. Tinois, E., Gaetani, Q., Gayraud B. et al.
Predictivity of an in vitro model for Toxicology in vitro 20, 547-559. (1994). The Episkin model: successful
acute and chrinic skin irritation Nguyen, D. H., Beuerman, R. W., reconstruction of human epidermis in
(SkinEthic) applied to the testing of DeWever, B. et al. (2003). Three- vitro. In V. Rougier, A. Goldberg and
topical vehicJes. Cell Biology and dimensional construct of the human H. I. Maibach (eds.), In vitro skin
Toxicology is. 121-135. corneal epithelium for in vitro toxicol- Toxieology Irritation, Phototoxicity,
Doucet, 0., Lanvin. M., Thillou, C. et a1. ogy. In Harry Salem and Sidney Katz Sensitization (133-194). New York :
(2006). Reconstituted human corneal (eds.), Alternative toxicological meth- Mary Ann Liebert Inc ..
epithelium. A new alternative to the ods (147-159). CRC Press. Tornier, c., Rosdy, M., Maibach, H.
Draize eye test for the assessment of Sahuc, F., DeWever, B. and Rosdy, M. (2006). In vitro skin irritation testing
the eye irritation potential of chemieals (2004). Human pigmented epidermis on RHE reproducibility for 50 chemi-
and cosmetic products. Toxicology in reconstructed in a chemically defined cals tested with two protocols.
vitro 20, 499-512. medium used for the evaluation of Toxicology in vitro 20, 401-416.
Fentem, J., Botham, J., Curren, R. et al. modulation of pigmentation. European Van de Vannet, B., DeWever, B.,
(1998). The ECVAM international val- Society of Pigmented Cell Research, Bottenberg, P. et a1. (2005). In vitro
idation study on in vitro test for skin September 2004. toxicity evaluation of toothpastes using
corrosivity. 2. Results and evaluation Schaller, M., Korting, H. c., Borelli, C. et reconstructed human oral and gingival
by the management team. Toxicology al. (2005). Candida albicans secreted mucosa models. Society of Toxicology,
in vitro 12,483-527. aspartic proteinases modify the epithe- USA, Mareh 2005.
Flamand, N., Marrot, L., Belaidi, J. P. et lial cytokine response in an in vitro Van Goethem, F., Adriaens, E., Alepee, N.
al. (2006). Development of genotoxic- model of vaginal candidiasis. Infect. et al. (2006). Pre-validation of a new in
ity test procedures with Episkin, a immun. 73, 2758-2765. vitro reconstituted human corneal model
reconstructed human skin model: Schaller, M., Mailhammer, R., Grassi, G. to assess the eye irritating potential of
towards new tools for in vitro et a1. (2002). Infection of human oral chemicals. Toxicology in vitro 20, 1-17.
risk assessment of dermally applied epithelium with Candida species
compounds? Genetic Toxicology & induces cytokine expression correlated Correspondence to
Environnement Toxicology. Amster- to the degree of virulence. 1. Arme de Brugerolle
dam : Elsevier. Investigative Dermatology t is, 652- Chief Executive Officer of SkinEthic
Kandarova, H., Liebsch, M., Schmidt, E. 657. SkinEthic Laboratories
et al. (2006). Assessment of the skin Seiberg, M. (2003). The PAR-2 pathway 45, rue Saint-Philippe
irritation potential of chemieals by regulates pigmentation via me- 06000 Nice
using the SkinEthic RHE model and lanosome transfer. international France
the common skin irritation protocol SkinEthoic Workshop, Oetober 2003. e-mail: adebrugerolle@skinethic.com