Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
UNIVERSITY OF YORK
1 (of 4). (a) Define the terms supremum and infimum, as applied to a non-empty and
bounded set S of real numbers. What are the maximum and minimum
of S when they exist? [4]
(b) For the following sets, write down their supremum and infimum if they
exist. You are not required to justify your answers.
S1 = {x ∈ R : x3 + x > 0} and S2 = {x ∈ R : (x − 1)2 < 4} .
[4]
(c) State the definition of convergence of a sequence of real numbers (an )n∈N
to a limit a ∈ R, and use this definition to show that
n3 1
→ as n → ∞ .
2n3 − 1 2
[7]
[2]
Page 2 (of 5)
MAT00005C
2 (of 4). (a) Let f : J → R be a real function defined on the non-empty open interval
J ⊂ R. Give the ε, δ definition for the limit of f (x) to be L as x tends
to a ∈ J. [3]
(b) Using the ε, δ definition of limit show that the function f : R → R given
by f (x) = 2x3 satisfies
lim f (x) = 2 .
x→1
[5]
(e) Give the definition of a partition P of the compact interval [a, b]. Give
the definitions of the lower sum L(P, f ) and upper sum U (P, f ) of a
bounded function f : [a, b] → R. Define the quantities Lba (f ) and Uab (f ).
What does it mean for f to be Riemann integrable? [8]
T = {x2 : x ∈ S} .
Show that 2
sup(T ) = sup(S) .
[8]
(b) By expanding the numerator and denominator into n factors, show that
if n ≥ 3 then
2n 4
≤ .
n! n
n
Deduce that 2 /n! → 0 as n → ∞. [5]
diverges and
∞
X 4j + 3
j=1
j5 + j3 + 1
converges. [6]
Page 4 (of 5)
MAT00005C
(c) State the Mean Value Theorem. Use it to show that if a function
f : (a, b) → R is differentiable with f 0 (x) ≤ 0 for all x ∈ (a, b), then
f is decreasing. [5]
1. (a) The supremum of a non-empty and bounded set is the least upper bound
and the infimum is the greatest lower bound. The minimum is the infimum
when the infimum belongs to the set, and the maximum is the supremum
when the supremum belongs to the set. 4 Marks
(b) Note that S1 = (0, ∞), so it is not bounded above and has no supremum,
and also it has infimum 0. For S2 we have: x ∈ S2 if and only if |x − 1| < 2.
This is equivalent to −1 < x < 3, so the infimum of S2 is −1 and the
supre-
mum is 3. 4 Marks
and n. 4 Marks
(e) (i) Leibniz test: note that log(n + 2) are positive for n ≥ 0 and are increas-
ing, so the terms of the given series alternate in sign, decrease in magnitude
and tend to zero, so the series converges. 2 Marks
(ii) The radius of convergence of the given power series is 0 if the series con-
verges only when x = x0 and it is ∞ when the series converges for all x ∈ R.
7
SOLUTIONS MAT00005C
2. (a) f (x) → L as x → a if for every ε > 0 there exists δε > 0 such that
0 < |x − a| < δε ⇒ x ∈ J and |f (x) − L| < ε .
3 Marks
8
SOLUTIONS MAT00005C
9
SOLUTIONS MAT00005C
Mark 1
f is Riemann integrable if Lba (f ) = Uab (f ), in which case we define the
integral
Rb
as a f = Lba (f ) = Uab (f ). 3
Marks
Total: 25 Marks
(b) We have
2n 222 2 2
= ··· .
n! 123 (n − 1) n
The product of the first two terms is 2, and if n ≥ 3, each of the next (n − 3)
terms are less than 1, and the last term is 2/n, so we obtain
2n 2 4
0< ≤2 = .
n! n n
Since 4/n → 0 as n → ∞, by the Sandwich Theorem we conclude
that
2n /n! → 0 as n → ∞. 5 Marks
we apply the Cauchy’s condensation test to (1) and the limit comparison test
to (2). In the case of (1) the condensed series is
∞ ∞
X
k 1 X
2 = 2k/3 .
k=1
22k/3 k=1
Since the latter series diverges, the condensed series diverges. Therefore, by
Cauchy’s condensation test the series (1) diverges. Another way of proving
10
SOLUTIONS MAT00005C
this is to see that j 2/3 ≤ j for all j ∈ N, which implies 1/j 2/3 ≥ 1/j and then
n n
X 1 X 1
2/3
≥ ,
j=1
j j=1
j
P
for all n ∈ N. Since the harmonic series j≥1 1/j diverges, it follows that the
series (1) diverges by the comparison test.
Now for the series (2) we note that
4j 5 + 3j 4
4j + 3 1
= → 4,
j5 + j3 + 1 j4 j5 + j3 + 1
1/j 4 is
P
so the series (2) converges by the limit comparison test (since
j≥1
convergent and the series (2) has non-negative terms). 6
Marks
√ √ √ √
(d) Since n + 1 > n we conclude that n + 1/ n ≥ 1, so 1 is a lower
bound for the set. Now let b > 1 and we should show that b is not a lower
bound. Assume √
n+1 p
√ = 1 + 1/n ≥ b .
n
Then 1 + 1/n ≥ b2 and 1/n ≥ b2 − 1 > 0. This implies that n ≤ 1/(b2 − 1).
By the Archimedean property, this does not hold for every n ∈ N, so b cannot
be a lower bound. This shows that the greatest lower bound (infimum)
is 1.
6 Marks
Total: 25 Marks
4. (a) First let us show that f is continuous at every x ∈ R. Consider the point
x + h for h small. Then
Since limh→0 f (h) = 1 by hypothesis, we see that limh→0 f (x + h) =f (x), so
limy→x f (y) = f (x) and f is continuous at x ∈ R. 4 Marks
f (x + y) = f (x)f (y) = 0 ,
for all y ∈ R. This implies that f is identically zero. But limx→0 f (x) = 1
and hence this leads to a contradiction. Therefore f (x) 6= 0 for all x ∈ R.
11
SOLUTIONS MAT00005C
(c) The Mean Value Theorem states that if a function f : [a, b] → R is con-
tinuous on [a, b] and differentiable on (a, b) then there exists c ∈ (a, b) such
that
f (b) − f (a)
f 0 (c) = .
b−a
2 Marks
Suppose f : (a, b) → R is differentiable and let a < x < y < b. Then by the
Mean Value Theorem there exists c ∈ (x, y) for which
f (y) − f (x)
= f 0 (c) ≤ 0.
y−x
Since y − x > 0 it follows that f (y) ≤ f (x). Since the choice of x< y was
arbitrary, f is decreasing on (a, b). 3 Marks
(d) Riemann’s criterion for integrability states that a bounded function f : [a, b] →
R is Riemann integrable if and only if given any ε > 0 there exists a partition
Pε of [a, b] for which
U (Pε , f ) − L(Pε , f ) < ε.
2 Marks
12
SOLUTIONS MAT00005C
Pδ = {r, t − δ, t + δ, s}.
Then
−2δ|g(t)| ≤ L(Pδ , g) ≤ U (Pδ , g) ≤ 2δ|g(t)| . (1)
So given ε > 0, we may choose δ small enough (for instance less than
ε/(4|g(t)|) for g(t) 6= 0, which we can assume to be true) such that U (Pδ , g) −
L(Pδ , g) < ε. By Riemann’s criterion for integrability, it follows that g is
integrable on [a, b]. Now the integral satisfies
Z b
L(Pδ , g) ≤ g ≤ U (Pδ , g).
a
13