Enhancing Maritime Safety Training

Through Active Learning: The

Theoretical Framework and
Prototype Development of the
Virtual Training Vessel
Authors:
Marie C. Grasmeier (marie@mayday-academy.org)
Tajana Tadić (tajana@mayday-academy.org)

Acknowledgments
We want to thank all the volunteers of the search-and-rescue fleet for their work to save lives at sea
every day.
We also want to thank the wonderful communities developing the great tools for our projects like
Godot and Blender. A special shout out to nagidev (https://github.com/nagidev/DialogueNodes) for
his great support in creating our first prototype) and to Aaron of NWH studios
(https://nwhcoding.com/) for the great dynamic water physics simulation and his kind support of
our project.

1 Introduction
Maritime safety training represents a critical component of ensuring the well-being of seafarers, the
protection of maritime assets, and the preservation of our oceans. Traditionally, maritime training
follows a pedagogical model that combines both passive and active learning elements. While hands-
on exercises are a crucial component of important STCW (Standards of Training, Certification, and
Watchkeeping) training courses, theoretical components often rely on lectures, readings, and rote
memorization. While hands-on exercises can effectively promote active learning, the conventional
approach to theoretical knowledge transfer sometimes falls short in preparing maritime
professionals for the dynamic challenges they may encounter at sea.
Moreover, recent developments in search-and-rescue (SAR) operations have underscored the
critical importance of effective training and preparedness for SAR teams. A recent study by
Pauksztat and Praetorius in 2023 identified pressing training needs within the SAR community,
shedding light on the challenges and training requirements.
One of the key challenges emphasized by all interviewees in the study was the limited time
available for training, a common issue particularly during intense training weeks on board ships at
the start of each rotation.
One of the approaches discussed to solve the issue discussed was the incorporation of different
training modalities, such as synchronous or asynchronous e-learning. These modalities offer the
potential to distribute training units and alleviate some of the pressures associated with the intense
training week.
In light of these challenges and insights, the Virtual Training Vessel emerges as a compelling
solution.
This paper explores a paradigm shift in maritime safety education by extending the concept of
active learning to the theoretical component of maritime safety training – a pedagogical approach
that engages learners in participatory, hands-on experiences. Our journey begins with the
development of the Virtual Training Vessel, an innovative initiative by Mayday Academy, aimed at
redefining how maritime safety training is delivered and experienced.
Active learning, grounded in educational psychology and instructional design principles, forms the
theoretical foundation of this endeavor. It promises to bridge the gap between theoretical knowledge
and practical application, enhancing knowledge retention and equipping learners with the critical
thinking and problem-solving skills essential for maritime safety.
As we delve into the theoretical framework underpinning active learning in maritime safety
training, we also embark on the practical journey of developing the first prototype of the Virtual
Training Vessel. This paper aims to illuminate the process, challenges, and insights gained during
the prototype's creation, offering a glimpse into the promise of this transformative approach.
The horizon of maritime safety education is evolving, and this paper invites readers to explore the
uncharted waters of active learning and the innovative possibilities presented by the Virtual
Training Vessel project. Together, we embark on a voyage of discovery, where theory meets
practice, and the future of maritime safety training takes shape.

2 Theoretical Framework of Active Learning in

Maritime Safety Training
2.1 Defining the Key Principles and Components of Active
Learning
Active learning, as a pedagogical approach, represents a departure from traditional passive learning
methods. It places learners at the center of the educational process, emphasizing engagement,
interaction, and participation. In this chapter, we delve into the foundational principles and essential
components that define active learning, shedding light on why it holds significant promise in the
realm of maritime safety education (Kovarik et al 2022; Nguyen et al., 2021).

Key Principles of Active Learning:

1. Engagement:
At the heart of active learning lies the principle of engagement. Learners are actively involved in
the learning process, which may include discussions, problem-solving, hands-on activities, and
simulations. This engagement goes beyond passive listening or reading and encourages students to
take an active role in constructing their knowledge (Hodges 2020).
2. Interaction: Interaction, both with course content and, in some cases, fellow learners, is a
fundamental principle of active learning. Learners seek clarification and participate in activities that
promote interaction with the subject matter. In the Virtual Training Vessel, particularly in its online
deployment, interaction with fellow learners may not be present. However, learners actively engage
with course content and scenarios. This interaction with the content fosters deeper understanding
and provides opportunities for independent problem-solving and skill development (Hodges 2020).
3. Critical Thinking: Active learning promotes critical thinking skills. Learners are encouraged to
analyze, evaluate, and synthesize information rather than simply memorizing facts. They engage in
higher-order cognitive processes that are essential for problem-solving and decision-making in real-
world scenarios (Lu et al., 2021; Mutambuki et al., 2020; Santangelo et al., 2021).
4. Problem-Solving: Problem-solving is a core element of active learning. Learners are presented
with complex problems or scenarios that require them to apply their knowledge and skills to find
solutions. This principle prepares learners for practical challenges they may encounter in their
maritime careers (Rossi et al., 2021).

Components of Active Learning:

1. Instructor Facilitation:
In active learning environments, instructors take on the role of facilitators rather than lecturers.
They guide discussions, provide support, and create opportunities for active participation.
Instructors play a crucial role in structuring activities and fostering a conducive learning
atmosphere.
2. Student Engagement:
Active learning places a significant responsibility on students to engage actively in the learning
process. Learners take ownership of their education by taking part in hands-on activities. Their
engagement drives the learning experience.
3. Collaboration:
Collaborative learning is a central component of active learning. Learners often work in groups or
pairs to solve problems, discuss concepts, and share insights. Collaboration not only deepens
understanding but also enhances communication and teamwork skills.
4. Application of Knowledge:
Active learning is characterized by the application of knowledge in real or simulated contexts.
Learners are presented with scenarios that require them to use their theoretical knowledge to make
informed decisions and solve practical problems.
5. Feedback and Reflection:
Continuous feedback and reflection are integral to active learning. Learners receive feedback on
their performance, which helps them assess their understanding and make improvements. Reflection
encourages metacognition, allowing learners to think about their own thinking processes (Kovarik
et al 2022).
In the context of maritime safety education, these principles and components of active learning hold
great promise. They provide a framework for creating engaging, effective, and practical training
experiences that prepare maritime professionals to navigate the challenges of their field. In the
subsequent chapters, we will explore how these principles are embodied in the development and
implementation of the Virtual Training Vessel.

2.2 Active Learning and Its Alignment with Maritime Safety

Education Goals
Maritime safety education holds paramount importance in preparing seafarers for the complexities
and challenges of maritime careers. Traditionally, maritime safety training has balanced hands-on
practical exercises with didactic teaching methods, emphasizing theoretical knowledge transfer.
While hands-on practice is a pivotal component and widely valued, the theoretical aspect of training
is often perceived as less engaging, sometimes overwhelming students with factual information.
Despite the practical training's effectiveness, this conventional approach to theoretical knowledge
transfer can fall short in preparing individuals for the dynamic and unpredictable nature of maritime
safety scenarios. Active learning, as a pedagogical approach, offers a compelling alignment with the
core goals of maritime safety education, particularly by revitalizing the theoretical component and
enhancing engagement.

Enhancing Practical Competence

One of the primary goals of maritime safety education is to equip individuals with the practical
competence required to respond effectively to emergencies and safety incidents at sea. Active
learning complements this goal by immersing learners in scenarios that simulate real-world
situations. Whether it's mustering in case of an alarm, deploying life rafts, or responding to fire
incidents, active learning scenarios offer hands-on experience that enhances practical competence
(Rossi et al. 2021).

Bridging Theory and Practice

Maritime safety education aims to bridge the gap between theoretical knowledge and practical
application. Active learning scenarios serve as a bridge by allowing learners to apply the theoretical
concepts they have learned in a tangible and meaningful way. This alignment ensures that
theoretical knowledge is not abstract but rather a foundation upon which practical skills are built.

Fostering Decision-Making Skills

A key aspect of maritime safety education is the development of effective decision-making skills. In
maritime emergencies, quick and informed decisions can be life-saving. Active learning scenarios
challenge learners to make decisions under pressure, promoting critical thinking and decision-
making skills essential for safety at sea.
Improving Knowledge Retention
One of the challenges in maritime safety education is ensuring that learners retain and recall critical
information when it matters most. Active learning has been shown to improve knowledge retention
significantly. Engaging in practical, problem-solving activities enhances memory consolidation,
making learners better prepared for safety challenges (Aykan & Dursun 2022)..

Encouraging a Safety Mindset

Ultimately, maritime safety education aims to instill a safety mindset that is deeply ingrained in
learners' thinking and actions. Active learning scenarios reinforce the importance of safety by
immersing learners in situations where safety measures are paramount. This alignment fosters a
culture of safety-consciousness.
In conclusion, active learning aligns seamlessly with the goals of maritime safety education. It
provides a transformative approach that not only imparts knowledge but also equips learners with
practical skills, decision-making abilities, and a safety-oriented mindset. In the subsequent chapters,
we will explore how the Virtual Training Vessel project embodies these principles, contributing to
the advancement of maritime safety education.

2.3 Exploring Theoretical Foundations in Educational

Psychology and Instructional Design
To appreciate the profound impact of active learning in maritime safety education, it is imperative
to delve into the theoretical foundations that underpin this pedagogical approach. Active learning
draws upon principles and insights from educational psychology and instructional design, aligning
its methodologies with the cognitive and behavioral aspects of learning. This section explores the
key theoretical foundations that inform active learning in the context of maritime safety education.

Constructivism:
Constructivism, a prominent theory in educational psychology, posits that learners actively
construct knowledge through their experiences, interactions, and reflections. This theory
emphasizes the role of learners as active participants in the learning process. In maritime safety
education, constructivism is manifested through active learning scenarios that require learners to
engage with safety concepts, problem-solve, and apply their knowledge. Constructivist principles
align with the goal of building practical competence and bridging theory and practice (Slezak 2014).

Experiential Learning
Experiential learning theory, developed by David Kolb, emphasizes the significance of concrete
experiences in the learning process. It suggests that learners gain knowledge and develop skills by
reflecting on their experiences and connecting them to conceptual understanding. Active learning
scenarios in maritime safety education provide learners with experiential opportunities to respond to
simulated emergencies, fostering a deep understanding of safety procedures (Kolb 1984).

Cognitive Load Theory

Cognitive Load Theory, proposed by John Sweller, focuses on the mental effort required for
learning. It suggests that instructional design should manage cognitive load effectively to optimize
learning outcomes. Active learning scenarios in the maritime safety context are designed to
minimize extraneous cognitive load by presenting realistic and contextualized tasks. Learners can
focus on understanding and applying safety procedures without cognitive overload (Sweller 1988).

Constructive Alignment
Constructive Alignment, a concept in instructional design, emphasizes aligning learning activities
and assessments with intended learning outcomes. In active learning, scenarios are carefully
designed to align with specific safety objectives. Learners engage in activities that directly
contribute to achieving these outcomes, ensuring a clear connection between what is taught and
what is assessed.
Understanding these theoretical foundations in educational psychology and instructional design
provides the rationale for adopting active learning methodologies in maritime safety education. By
grounding active learning in these principles, we ensure that it is not just an innovative approach but
one firmly rooted in established educational theory, making it a powerful tool for enhancing
maritime safety training.
In the subsequent chapters, we will apply these theoretical foundations to the development and
implementation of the Virtual Training Vessel, showcasing how these principles come to life in
practice.

2.4 The Virtual Training Vessel: From Concept to Prototype

Inception and Conceptualization of the Virtual Training Vessel
The inception of the Virtual Training Vessel project marked a pivotal moment in the evolution of
maritime safety education. This chapter traces the project's origins, detailing the conceptualization
process that led to the development of this innovative and transformative platform. The journey of
the Virtual Training Vessel began with a realization: while traditional maritime safety training
methods have been effective in imparting theoretical knowledge and fostering practical skills, there
has been a growing need for innovative approaches to enhance the engagement of learners,
particularly in the theoretical component, and bridge the gap between theory and practice. The
maritime industry's dynamic nature has necessitated a training platform that can adapt to evolving
safety protocols and provide learners with hands-on experiences, thereby complementing the well-
established practical training aspects.
From the project's inception, the commitment to open-source technology was paramount. The
decision to harness the power of Godot 4 and Blender was driven by a desire to create an accessible
and adaptable platform. Open-source technology aligned with the project's mission to make high-
quality training available to a wide audience without the constraints of proprietary software.
The next step in conceptualization was defining a clear vision for the Virtual Training Vessel. The
vision encompassed several critical elements:
• Accessibility: The platform had to be accessible to learners regardless of their geographical
location, economic resources, or technical capabilities. This meant designing a lightweight,
browser-based solution that could run on standard computers with an internet connection.
 • Engagement: The platform aimed to engage learners actively, encouraging them to
participate in realistic maritime safety scenarios. This engagement would, in turn, enhance
knowledge retention and practical competence.
• Customization: Recognizing that different maritime organizations and training centers have
unique needs, the vision included the provision of customization options. Users would have
the flexibility to tailor scenarios to their specific requirements.
A critical aspect of the Virtual Training Vessel's conceptualization was striking the right balance
between realism and didactic effectiveness. While the platform aims to provide realistic simulations
of maritime safety scenarios, it also acknowledges the need to simplify and focus on the educational
objectives. This approach ensured that the scenarios would enhance learning without overwhelming
users with unnecessary complexity.
In summary, the inception and conceptualization of the Virtual Training Vessel were driven by a
recognition of the need for innovation in maritime safety education. The commitment to open-
source technology, the clear vision of accessibility and engagement, the consideration of
customization, and the balance between realism and didactic effectiveness all laid the foundation for
a project that aimed to redefine how maritime safety training is delivered.
In the following chapters, we will explore how these initial concepts and principles evolved into the
tangible reality of the Virtual Training Vessel, providing maritime professionals with a
groundbreaking approach to safety education.

Rationale for Choosing Open-Source Technology

The selection of technology for the Virtual Training Vessel was a decision of paramount importance.
It not only determined the feasibility of the project but also aligned with the core principles of
accessibility, adaptability, and inclusivity. The rationale for choosing open-source technology,
exemplified by Godot 4 and Blender, underscores the project's commitment to making maritime
safety training accessible to all.
The primary goal of the Virtual Training Vessel project was to create a training platform that would
be accessible to maritime professionals worldwide. Open-source technology played a pivotal role in
achieving this goal. Open-source software is known for its cost-effectiveness. Licensing fees and
software acquisition costs can be substantial, especially for educational institutions and training
centers. Godot 4 and Blender, being open-source, provided the project with a cost-effective
foundation, allowing resources to be directed toward content development and refinement rather
than software licensing.
Open-source software ecosystems thrive on community collaboration. Choosing Godot 4 and
Blender meant becoming part of vibrant and supportive communities of developers, artists, and
educators. This collaborative environment enabled the project to tap into a wealth of knowledge,
share best practices, and leverage the collective expertise of the open-source communities to
continually improve the Virtual Training Vessel.
The decision to rely on open-source technology also aligned with the project's vision of long-term
sustainability. Proprietary software solutions can face uncertain futures, including changes in
licensing terms or discontinuation of support. By embracing open-source technology, the Virtual
Training Vessel project aimed to ensure the platform's longevity and adaptability in the ever-
evolving landscape of maritime safety training.
Open-source technology embodies principles of transparency and ethical software development.
These principles resonated with the values of the project, reinforcing the commitment to providing
an accessible and ethically grounded solution for maritime safety education.
In summary, the rationale for choosing open-source technology, specifically Godot 4 and Blender,
for the Virtual Training Vessel was driven by a deep-seated commitment to accessibility, cost-
effectiveness, adaptability, collaboration, sustainability, and ethical considerations. These choices
laid a solid foundation for the development of a training platform that would democratize maritime
safety education and redefine how professionals prepare for the challenges of their field.

Challenges and Considerations in Developing the First Playable

Prototype
The development journey of the Virtual Training Vessel was not without its challenges and
considerations, especially as the project transitioned from previous experiments with Unity3D to
adopting Godot 4. The decision to embrace open-source technology brought with it both
opportunities and hurdles, all of which contributed to the creation of the first playable prototype.
Prior to the development of the Virtual Training Vessel, the project team had invested nearly a year
in experimenting with Unity3D. The decision to switch to Godot 4 was motivated by several
factors, including a simpler and more user-friendly interface, improved integration with Blender,
and the open-source nature of the platform. However, this transition posed a challenge in terms of
adapting to a new development environment and workflow.
One of the notable challenges was the need to learn Godot 4 from scratch. The project team
consisted of maritime and search-and-rescue professionals, not programmers with a computer
science background. This presented a learning curve that required mastering a new toolset and
understanding the fundamentals of game development. Despite this, the team's dedication and the
intuitive user experience (UX) of Godot 4 facilitated a surprisingly smooth transition.
Resource limitations were a consideration throughout the development process. As a project driven
by a commitment to accessibility and affordability, the team had to operate with constrained
resources. This meant making efficient use of available tools and talents to create a functional
prototype without exceeding budgetary constraints.
In developing the first playable prototype, the team made careful considerations to ensure that it
effectively demonstrated the capabilities of the Virtual Training Vessel. Several factors influenced
the choice of scenario for the prototype:
• Simplicity: Given the transition to a new development environment, the team opted for a
straightforward scenario that would allow them to experiment with the engine's capabilities
and showcase the project's potential without unnecessary complexity.
• Inspiration from Fire Brigades: The team drew inspiration from leadership training methods
used in fire brigades, particularly the "Planspiel" or table-top exercises. This method
involves presenting a situation in a model or diorama format and encouraging trainees to
discuss and plan how to proceed in real-life situations. The Virtual Training Vessel aimed to
adapt this idea into a digital environment.
 • Scenario Choice: The chosen scenario revolved around incident assessment and decision-
making, mirroring situations that could be encountered in the STCW (Standards of Training,
Certification, and Watchkeeping) Advanced Fire Fighting Course. This scenario not only
allowed for the demonstration of the platform's capabilities but also served as a relevant and
engaging training experience for maritime professionals.
In conclusion, the development of the first playable prototype of the Virtual Training Vessel was a
journey marked by challenges, transitions, and strategic considerations. The decision to switch to
Godot 4, the learning curve, resource limitations, and the careful selection of a scenario all played
pivotal roles in shaping the project's early stages. Despite these challenges, the project team's
commitment to innovation and accessibility ultimately led to the successful creation of a prototype
that showcased the potential of active learning in maritime safety education.

3 Active Learning Scenarios: The Didactic Approach

3.1 Design Philosophy of Active Learning Scenarios in the
Virtual Training Vessel
The heart of the Virtual Training Vessel project lies in its active learning scenarios—immersive,
hands-on experiences that challenge learners to engage with maritime safety concepts and apply
their knowledge in realistic situations. This chapter unveils the design philosophy that underpins
these scenarios, offering insights into how they are crafted to facilitate effective learning and skill
development.
At the core of the design philosophy is the principle of experiential learning. The scenarios are
meticulously crafted to provide learners with opportunities to engage in experiential learning, where
they actively participate in maritime safety situations. This hands-on approach mirrors real-life
experiences and allows learners to internalize safety procedures by doing rather than passively
observing.
While the Virtual Training Vessel prioritizes experiential learning, it also maintains a commitment
to realism and practicality. The scenarios are designed to closely resemble actual maritime safety
situations, from mustering during alarms to deploying life rafts or responding to fire incidents. This
level of realism ensures that learners are well-prepared to apply their skills in real-world scenarios.
The scenarios are structured to offer a progression in complexity. Learners start with foundational
exercises and gradually advance to more challenging tasks. This approach aligns with the principles
of scaffolding, ensuring that learners build a solid understanding of basic concepts before tackling
more complex safety procedures.
A crucial aspect of maritime safety education is the development of effective decision-making
skills. The scenarios in the Virtual Training Vessel provide numerous decision-making
opportunities. Learners must make choices, assess risks, and take actions in response to evolving
situations. These decision points foster critical thinking and enhance learners' ability to respond
appropriately in emergencies.
Interactivity is a hallmark of the design philosophy. Learners actively engage with the scenarios and
interact with virtual environments and objects. Whether it's coordinating efforts to launch a lifeboat
or communicating with team members during a fire drill, interactivity and collaboration are central
to the learning experience.
Each scenario incorporates feedback and assessment mechanisms. Learners receive immediate
feedback on their actions, allowing them to learn from their mistakes and improve. Assessments are
aligned with safety objectives, ensuring that learners' performance aligns with industry standards
and best practices.
The design philosophy also encourages reflective practice. Learners are encouraged to reflect on
their experiences and decisions, fostering metacognition—the ability to think about one's thinking.
This reflective element enhances the depth of learning, as learners analyze their actions and
consider alternative approaches.
In conclusion, the design philosophy behind the active learning scenarios in the Virtual Training
Vessel is rooted in experiential learning, realism, progressive complexity, decision-making,
interactivity, feedback, and reflective practice. These principles collectively create a training
environment that immerses learners in practical maritime safety scenarios, equipping them with the
knowledge, skills, and mindset needed to respond effectively to emergencies at sea.

3.2 Enhancing Knowledge Retention Through Active

Engagement
Active engagement, a cornerstone of the Virtual Training Vessel's design philosophy, holds the key
to significantly improving knowledge retention in maritime safety education (Kovarik et al 2022;
Aykan & Dursun 2022). This chapter delves into how the platform's active learning scenarios
leverage active engagement to maximize the retention of critical safety knowledge.
In traditional maritime safety education, learners often passively receive information through
lectures, readings, or presentations for theoretical knowledge. While these methods convey
knowledge, they may not fully optimize knowledge retention. It is worth noting that practical,
hands-on components have been instrumental in complementing this theoretical knowledge transfer.
Active engagement, however, can shift the focus from passive reception to active participation
already in the theoretical stage. Learners become protagonists in their learning journey, taking on
the roles of decision-makers and problem-solvers in realistic maritime safety scenarios, which can
enhance the overall effectiveness of their training.
Active engagement stimulates cognitive processes that are central to memory retention. When
learners actively engage in scenarios, their brains are tasked with processing information, making
decisions, and executing actions. These cognitive processes create stronger neural connections,
leading to improved memory consolidation—the process by which new knowledge is stored in
long-term memory (Amin & Malik, 2013).
The scenarios in the Virtual Training Vessel immerse learners in contextualized maritime safety
situations. Contextual learning has been shown to enhance knowledge retention by providing
learners with a meaningful framework in which to anchor new information (Kovarik et al 2022;
Aykan & Dursun 2022). When learners encounter safety procedures within the context of a realistic
scenario, they are more likely to remember and apply that knowledge effectively in similar real-
world situations.
Active engagement scenarios go beyond theoretical understanding; they enable practical application
and skill mastery. Learners not only grasp safety concepts but also practice applying them in
dynamic situations (Andrews, 2020; Hodges, 2020). This hands-on experience reinforces
understanding and contributes to the mastery of safety skills. Research in education and psychology
consistently demonstrates that active learning methods lead to superior long-term retention
compared to passive learning. By actively engaging with safety scenarios, learners are more likely
to retain knowledge and skills over extended periods (Kovarik et al 2022; Aykan & Dursun 2022).
This retention is particularly crucial in the maritime industry, where safety protocols must be
remembered and applied under stressful conditions.
Active engagement fosters a culture of continuous learning. Learners become accustomed to
seeking information, making decisions, and honing their skills. This mindset extends beyond the
training environment, encouraging maritime professionals to remain proactive in their pursuit of
safety knowledge throughout their careers.
In summary, the Virtual Training Vessel's active engagement scenarios offer a powerful means of
enhancing knowledge retention in maritime safety education. By actively involving learners in
realistic, contextualized, and interactive experiences, the platform strengthens memory
consolidation, facilitates practical application, and cultivates a culture of continuous learning. The
result is a generation of maritime professionals better equipped to retain and apply critical safety
knowledge throughout their careers.

4 Conclusion
In the world of maritime safety education, where the stakes are high, innovation is paramount.
Chapters 1 through 4 of this exploration into the Virtual Training Vessel project have revealed a
transformative approach to maritime safety training that embraces active learning, leverages open-
source technology, and immerses learners in realistic scenarios. As we conclude this journey
through the project's early stages, several pivotal themes emerge:
1. Active Learning as a Catalyst: Chapter 1 introduced us to the concept of active learning—a
paradigm shift in maritime safety education. The Virtual Training Vessel project embodies
this shift, emphasizing learner engagement, practical application, and the bridge between
theory and practice.
2. Open-Source Commitment: Chapter 2 explored the rationale for adopting open-source
technology, Godot 4 and Blender, as the project's foundational tools. This choice not only
ensures accessibility but also aligns with principles of adaptability, customization, and
ethical software development.
3. Challenges and Triumphs: Chapter 3 delved into the challenges faced during the transition
from Unity3D to Godot 4, the learning curve for non-programmers, and the resource
constraints. Despite these hurdles, the project team's dedication and the user-friendly nature
of Godot 4 allowed them to create a successful prototype within a remarkably short
timeframe.
4. Design Philosophy of Active Learning: Chapter 4 unveiled the design philosophy
underpinning the Virtual Training Vessel's active learning scenarios. Experiential learning,
realism, progressive complexity, decision-making, interactivity, feedback, and reflective
 practice all coalesce to create a training environment that immerses learners in practical
maritime safety scenarios.
5. Enhancing Knowledge Retention: The potential for enhancing knowledge retention through
active engagement is a central theme throughout this exploration. Active learning scenarios
stimulate cognitive engagement, facilitate memory consolidation, promote contextual
learning, and foster skill mastery. They contribute to the creation of maritime professionals
equipped with a deep, long-lasting understanding of safe work practices.
As we look ahead to the subsequent chapters of this project's journey, it is clear that the Virtual
Training Vessel is not just a piece of software – it is a vision realized. It represents a dynamic shift
in how maritime safety education is approached, offering accessible, engaging, and effective
training that prepares professionals to navigate the challenges of their field. The Virtual Training
Vessel is not merely a vessel; it is a vessel of transformation, poised to redefine maritime safety
education for generations to come.

5 References:
Andrews DA, Sekyere EO, Bugarcic A. Collaborative Active Learning Activities Promote Deep
Learning in a Chemistry-Biochemistry Course. Med Sci Educ. 2020 Mar 27;30(2):801-810. doi:
10.1007/s40670-020-00952-x
Aji, C.A. and Khan, M.J. (2019) The Impact of Active Learning on Students’ Academic
Performance. Open Journal of Social Sciences , 7, 204-211. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2019.73017
Amin H, Malik AS. Human memory retention and recall processes. A review of EEG and fMRI
studies. Neurosciences (Riyadh). 2013 Oct;18(4):330-44.
Aykan, A., & Dursun, F. (2022). The Effect of Active Learning Techniques on Academic
Performance and Learning Retention in Science Lesson: An Experimental Study. Journal of STEM
Teacher Institutes, 2(1), 42-48.
Biggs, J and Tang, C. (2011): Teaching for Quality Learning at University, (McGraw-Hill and Open
University Press, Maidenhead)
Hodges, L.C. (2020). Student Engagement in Active Learning Classes. In: Mintzes, J.J., Walter,
E.M. (eds) Active Learning in College Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-
33600-4_3
Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential Learning: experience as the source of learning and development.
Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. p. 21
Kovarik, M. L., Robinson, J. K., & Wenzel, T. J. (2022). Why Use Active Learning?. In Active
Learning in the Analytical Chemistry Curriculum (pp. 1-12). American Chemical Society.
Lu, K., Yang, H.H., Shi, Y. et al. Examining the key influencing factors on college students’ higher-
order thinking skills in the smart classroom environment. Int J Educ Technol High Educ 18, 1
(2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00238-7
Markant, Douglas B., et al. "Enhanced memory as a common effect of active learning." Mind,
Brain, and Education 10.3 (2016): 142-152.
Martinez, Corinne (2022) Developing 21st century teaching skills: A case study of teaching and
learning through project-based curriculum, Cogent Education, 9:1, 2024936, DOI:
10.1080/2331186X.2021.2024936
Mutambuki, J. M., Mwavita, M., Muteti, C. Z., Jacob, B. I., & Mohanty, S. (2020). Metacognition
and active learning combination reveals better performance on cognitively demanding general
chemistry concepts than active learning alone. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(7), 1832-1840.
Nguyen, K.A., Borrego, M., Finelli, C.J. et al. Instructor strategies to aid implementation of active
learning: a systematic literature review. IJ STEM Ed 8, 9 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-
021-00270-7
Rossi IV, de Lima JD, Sabatke B, Nunes MAF, Ramirez GE, Ramirez MI. Active learning tools
improve the learning outcomes, scientific attitude, and critical thinking in higher education:
Experiences in an online course during the COVID-19 pandemic. Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2021
Nov;49(6):888-903. doi: 10.1002/bmb.21574. Epub 2021 Oct 15. PMID: 34652877; PMCID:
PMC8653153.
Santangelo, J., Cadieux, M., & Zapata, S. (2021). Developing student metacognitive skills using
active learning with embedded metacognition instruction. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations
and Research, 22(2).
Slezak, Peter (2014). "Appraising constructivism in science education". In Matthews, Michael R.
(ed.). International handbook of research in history, philosophy and science teaching. New York:
Springer. pp. 1023–1055. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-7654-8_31. ISBN .
Sweller, John (April 1988). "Cognitive Load During Problem Solving: Effects on Learning".
Cognitive Science. 12 (2): 257–285. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.459.9126.
doi:10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4

Walker SE. Active learning strategies to promote critical thinking. J Athl Train. 2003 Jul;38(3):263-
7

6 Support
If you want to support our work, we kindly ask you to have a look at our crowdfunding campaign:
https://www.gofundme.com/f/a-training-centre-for-the-civil-sar-fleet