Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
ANNEXURE – VI
3. WEB-LINKS WHERE COMPOSITION OF SCSR COMMITTEE, CSR POLICY AND CSR PROJECTS
APPROVED BY THE BOARD ARE DISCLOSED ON THE WEBSITE OF THE COMPANY:
i. The composition of the SCSR committee is available on our website at https://www.heromotocorp.com/en-in/about-
us/committee-of-directors.html.
ii. The CSR Policy of the Company is available on our website at https://www.heromotocorp.com/en-in/uploads/code_
policy/20191126104858-code-policy-35.pdf.
iii. The details of CSR projects are available on our website at https://www.heromotocorp.com/en-in/csr-we-care-annual-
report.html.
128
4. DETAILS OF IMPACT ASSESSMENT OF CSR PROJECTS CARRIED OUT IN PURSUANCE OF SUB-
RULE (3) OF RULE 8 OF THE COMPANIES (CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY POLICY)
RULES, 2014, IF APPLICABLE (ATTACH THE REPORT):
Details of impact assessment and outcomes are provided in Annexure VI(A)
5. DETAILS OF THE AMOUNT AVAILABLE FOR SET OFF IN PURSUANCE OF SUB-RULE (3) OF
RULE 7 OF THE COMPANIES (CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY POLICY) RULES, 2014
AND AMOUNT REQUIRED FOR SET OFF FOR THE FINANCIAL YEAR, IF ANY:
SI. Amount available for set-off
Financial Year Amount required to be set-off for the financial year, if any (in `)
No. from preceding financial years (in `)
1 2020-21 NIL -
Total NIL -
* The contribution of ` 31.38 crore was made to PM-CARES Fund on 31.03.2020 in pursuance of the appeal to contribute to PM-CARES Fund by
Secretary, Ministry of Corporate Affairs
7. (a) Two percent of average net profit of the Company as per Section 135(5): ` 87.22 crore
(b) Surplus arising out of the CSR projects or programmes or activities of the previous financial years: NIL
(c) Amount required to be set off for the financial year, if any: NIL
(d) Total CSR obligation for the financial year (7a+7b-7c): ` 87.22 crore
(b) Details of CSR amount spent against ongoing project for the financial year: Not Applicable
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11)
Items from Amount
the list of Amount Amount transferred to Mode of
Mode of
Name activities allocated spent in unspent CSR Implementation
SI. Local area Location of the Project Implementation
of the on for the the current account for – through
No. (Yes/No) project duration – Direct
Project Schedule project financial the project as implementing
(Yes/No)
VII to the (in `) year (in `) per Section agency
Act 135(6) (in `)
CSR
State District Name Registration
number.
1.
Total
Annexure – VI (Contd.)
(c) Details of CSR amount spent against other than ongoing projects for the financial year: As per Annexure VI(B)
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8)
Items from the
Mode of Mode of Implementation
SI. Name of the list of activities Local area Location of the Amount spent for
Implementation – - through implementing
No. Project in Schedule VII to (Yes/No) project the project (in `)
Direct (Yes/No) agency
the Act
CSR
State District Name registration
number
AS PER ANNEXURE VI (B)
Total 84,70,02,070
(f) Total amount spent for the Financial Year (8b+8c+8d+8e): ` 87,84,85,472
9. (a) Details of Unspent CSR amount for the preceding three financial years: NONE
Amount transferred to Amount spent
Amount remaining to
SI. Preceding Unspent CSR Account in the reporting Amount transferred to any fund specified under
be spent in succeeding
No. Financial Year under Section 135(6) Financial Year Schedule VII as per Section 135(6), if any
financial years (in `)
(in `) (in `)
Name of the Amount Date of
Fund (in `) transfer
1.
Total
(b) Details of CSR amount spent in the financial year for ongoing projects of the preceding financial year(s): NONE
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9)
Total amount Amount spent on Cumulative amount
Name Financial Year in Status of the
SI. Project allocated for the project in the spent at the end
Project ID of the which the project project- Completed
No. duration the project reporting Financial of the reporting
Project was commenced /Ongoing
(in `) Year (in `) Financial Year (in `)
1.
Total
130
10. IN CASE OF CREATION OR ACQUISITION OF CAPITAL ASSET, FURNISH THE DETAILS RELATING
TO THE ASSET SO CREATED OR ACQUIRED THROUGH CSR SPENT IN THE FINANCIAL YEAR
(ASSET-WISE DETAILS):
(a) Date of creation or acquisition of the capital asset(s).
(c) Details of the entity or public authority or beneficiary under whose name such capital asset is registered, their address etc.
(d) Provide details of the capital asset(s) created or acquired (including complete address and location of the capital asset.
No capital asset was created/acquired during FY 2021-22 through CSR spend.
11. SPECIFY THE REASON(S), IF THE COMPANY HAS FAILED TO SPEND TWO PER CENT OF THE
AVERAGE NET PROFIT AS PER SECTION 135(5):
Not Applicable
Sd/-
Dr. Pawan Munjal
(Chairman, SCSR Committee
Chairman & CEO)
ANNEXURE – VI(A)
IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT (FY 2021-22)
Under the project, the Company has been generously providing Project impact
scholarships to deserving students and supports infrastructure • Commendable performance at World Para Athletics Junior
development to institutions to increase their capacity to Championships 2019, Nottwil, Switzerland – The 25 athletes
accommodate more students. The primary recipients of these representing India participated in both the groups and won
interventions have been meritorious students from BML Munjal a total of 23 medals that included 11 gold, 6 silver and 6
University who are unable to afford tuition fee of the university bronze medals. – In overall rankings, India stood at second
but deserve to continue their higher education. position in total medal tally and at first position in under-20
medal tally.
Project outcomes • Commendable performance at World Para Athletics
• Scholarships: 559 scholarships to meritorious students to Championships, Dubai 2019 – India won a total of 9 medals
pursue BTech, LLB, BBA and MBA were awarded. which included 2 gold, 2 silver and 5 bronze. – The team also
• Internships and placements: 95 per cent of BTech witnessed a good jump in overall ranking as the country
students and 94 per cent of MBA students are placed at stood at 24th position in the total medals tally, several rungs
reputed companies. above its 34th position in 2017.
132
Project outcomes Key Findings:
• Pledge: 127,472 people pledged to ‘Be a Road Hero’ • Sapling survival rates are higher in areas with more recent
plantations and some form of safeguarding mechanisms
• Print media: Awareness content reached over 3.2 million
like water for irrigation or protected spaces. Simple average
readers of Hindustan Times
estimations reveal that sapling survival rates at an aggregate
• Radio: Awareness content reached 16.5 million listeners of level for the entire plantation effort under Green Drive (2.38
Fever FM million trees) can be taken at 75%
• Digital media: Awareness-focused posts on pages with • Implementation Partners have not maintained key project
more than 30 lakh social media followers (Hero MotoCorp documents like needs assessment reports, landscape change
and Hindustan Times combined) reports, soil analysis reports, flora/fauna composition,
regular monitoring reports.
• Digital media: 17,800+ individuals shared the microsite
link/url • The project lacks a clear strategy on community engagement.
The absence of a coherent strategy has made sapling
Project impact survival a challenge. Areas where community engagement
An increase of up to 14% in road-safety attitude* of individuals has happened have revealed better results, providing a
who had exposure to key road safety messages. template for future project design elements to be imbibed.
*The assumption made by an independent evaluation agency • The plantation effort has been sub-contracted by the
on the basis of meta analysis from secondary research studies: implementation partners to other agencies, presenting
(Phillips et al., 2009 and Phillips et al., 2011) potential reputational risks for Hero MotoCorp
• MoUs with Implementation Partners do not specify key
PROJECT NAME: HERO GREEN DRIVE milestones and reporting expectations.
Assessment Duration: December Project Impact: A snapshot of the sapling survival estimation is
2021-January 2022 provided below.
Project Brief: FY 2014-15 onwards, the Company has planted
over 2.38 million tree saplings. The study was conducted Sapling Survival Rate Average Sapling Survival
Implementation Partner
as per MOU Rate* as per TTC Team
for a comprehensive understanding of the afforestation
efforts carried out, the processes followed, implementation Contree 85 % 73.2%
and maintenance plans. The evaluators developed a sample Grow-Trees 85% 47.6%
selection criterion for selection of the project sites. The following BCCL 85% 76%
parameters were deployed to choose sites: EMACH 85% 70.2%
SGI 85% 77%
• Equitable distribution across all partner organisations
*Sapling survival rates have been averaged out across IPs for standardization
• Duration of plantation (more sample from older project **
Simple average estimations reveal that sapling survival rates at an
areas) aggregate level for the entire plantation effort of 2.38 million trees can
be taken at 75%
• Geographical coverage
• Number of saplings planted
Number of Sites
Implementation Partner State/Location
Visited
Contree Rajasthan 8
Grow-Trees Rajasthan 3
BCCL Delhi,Karnataka and 12
Tamil Nadu
EMACH Uttarakhand 4
SGI Noida 3
ANNEXURE – VI(B)
DETAILS OF CSR AMOUNT SPENT AGAINST OTHER THAN ONGOING PROJECTS FOR THE
FINANCIAL YEAR 2021-22
Mode of Mode of Implementation
Location of the project
Name of the Local Amount spent for Implementation Through Implementing Agency
Project Area the project ( in `) – Direct CSR Registration
State District (Yes/No) Name
Number
Community No Haryana Panchkula 34,58,873 Yes
Development No Maharashtra Nagpur 6,14,643 Yes
No West Bengal Alipurduar 21,33,518 Yes
No West Bengal Cooch Behar 93,08,515 Yes
Yes Haryana Sonipat 1,90,94,665 No International Foundation for CSR00000712
Research and Education
Yes Rajasthan Jaipur 13,58,118 Yes
COVID-19 Relief No Andhra Pradesh Chittoor 16,87,405 No Habitat for Humanity India CSR00000402
No Andhra Pradesh Tirupati 7,21,432 No Habitat for Humanity India CSR00000402
No Gujarat Ahmedabad 30,71,200 Yes
No Haryana Kurukshetra 61,89,296 Yes
No Uttarakhand Dehradun 96,07,509 Yes
Yes Andhra Pradesh Chittoor 12,29,500 No Habitat for Humanity India CSR00000402
Yes Andhra Pradesh Chittoor 1,43,913 Yes
Yes Delhi New Delhi 1,06,76,874 No People to People Health CSR00000068
Foundation
Yes Delhi New Delhi 1,465 Yes
Yes Delhi South Delhi 16,38,896 No People to People Health CSR00000068
Foundation
Yes Delhi South West 8,73,115 Yes
Delhi
Yes Delhi West Delhi 2,35,87,779 No People to People Health CSR00000068
Foundation
Yes Gujarat Panchmahal 10,85,842 No Setco Foundation CSR00004986
Yes Gujarat Panchmahal 36,40,668 Yes
Yes Haryana Gurugram 18,37,859 No Raman Kant Munjal CSR00004870
Foundation
Yes Haryana Gurugram 5,54,01,389 Yes
Yes Haryana Kurukshetra 2,34,440 Yes
Yes Haryana Gurugram 16,88,946 No Raman Kant Munjal CSR00004870
Foundation
Yes Haryana Rewari 19,800 Yes
Yes Rajasthan Alwar 34,85,852 Yes
Yes Rajasthan Jaipur 40,00,000 No Get Set Go Foundation CSR00006454
Yes Rajasthan Jaipur 26,56,810 No Nath Sanskriti Seva Sansthan CSR00005135
Yes Rajasthan Jaipur 89,21,215 Yes
Yes Uttarakhand Haridwar 31,91,197 No Adarsh Yuva Samiti CSR00000390
Yes Uttarakhand Haridwar 15,00,000 No Rama Krishna Sewasharam CSR00006101
Kankhal Haridwar
Yes Uttarakhand Haridwar 44,71,400 Yes
Nurturing and No Gujarat Junagarh 6,00,199 Yes
Protection of No Haryana Panchkula 1,86,93,676 Yes
Biodiversity No Haryana Panipat 2,12,400 Yes
No Karnataka Benguluru 59,00,000 Yes
No Madhya Pradesh Indore 6,99,150 Yes
No Tamil nadu Chennai 10,31,320 Yes
No Uttarakhand Dehradun 2,37,13,734 Yes
Yes Delhi Delhi 3,06,800 Yes
134
Annexure – VI(B) (Contd.)
136
Mode of Mode of Implementation
Location of the project
Name of the Local Amount spent for Implementation Through Implementing Agency
Project Area the project ( in `) – Direct CSR Registration
State District (Yes/No) Name
Number
Promoting No Assam Kamrup 36,79,530 Yes
preventive Metropolitan
health care Yes Gujarat Panchmahal 4,65,322 No Wockhardt Foundation CSR00000161
Yes Haryana Gurugram 1,04,42,906 Yes
Yes Haryana Rewari 29,00,000 No Hindustan Latex Family CSR00010248
Planning Promotion Trust
Yes Haryana Rewari 1,39,51,069 Yes
Yes Rajasthan Alwar 47,01,056 No Wockhardt Foundation CSR00000161
Yes Uttarakhand Haridwar 30,00,000 No Hindustan Latex Family CSR00010248
Planning Promotion Trust
Road Safety No Delhi West Delhi 47,349 Yes
No Haryana Gurugram 62,757 Yes
No Haryana Jind 17,20,646 Yes
No Jharkhand Ranchi 4,64,467 Yes
No Maharashtra Nagpur 8,54,754 Yes
No Maharashtra Nashik 23,338 Yes
No Maharashtra Pune 1,27,961 Yes
No Odisha Cuttack 23,91,022 Yes
No Telangana Hyderabad 9,60,616 Yes
No Uttar Pradesh Lucknow 21,77,449 Yes
Yes Delhi New Delhi 12,24,305 Yes
Yes Delhi South West 98,83,836 Yes
Delhi
Yes Delhi West Delhi 21,02,233 Yes
Yes Haryana Gurugram 37,07,237 Yes
Yes Haryana Jind 15,00,000 Yes
Khelo Hero Yes Haryana Jhajjar 3,50,000 No Mera Gaon Mera Desh CSR00017584
Total 84,70,02,070
Administrative 2,93,56,484
expenses
Impact 21,26,918
Assessment
Grand Total 87,84,85,472