Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
With contributions by
Bibliografische Information
der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek
ISBN 978-3-88467-131-3
ISSN 0171-1474
Preface . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . VII
Dieter Quast
Communication, Migration, Mobility and Trade. Explanatory Models for Exchange Processes
from the Roman Iron Age to the Viking Age . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
John Ljungkvist
Continental Imports to Scandinavia. Patterns and Changes between AD 400 and 800 . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
Egge Knol
Anglo-Saxon Migration Reflected in Cemeteries in the Northern Netherlands . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 113
Antonel Jepure
Researching Gothic Immigrants in Spain. An Archaeological Dilemma . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 181
Anna Lambropoulou
The Presence of Slavs in the Western Peloponnese during the 7th and 8th Centuries:
New Archaeological Evidence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 197
Christina Katsougiannopoulou
The Slavic Bow Brooches in Greece Revisited. Some Remarks on Ethnicity and Social Status . . . . . . . . 219
Tivadar Vida
Local or Foreign Romans? The Problem of the Late Antique Population
of the 6th-7th Centuries AD in Pannonia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 233
V
Lszl Schilling
An Avar-Period Germanic Brooch from Tc-Fvenypuszta . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 261
Matej Ruttkay
The North of the Carpathian Basin in the 5th and 6th Centuries AD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 273
VI
PREFACE
The transition from Antiquity to the Middle Ages was an era of vital importance to the formation of medi-
eval and modern Europe. The migrations of steppe-nomad and Germanic peoples caused changes over
wide parts of Europe. The Western Roman Empire fell apart into Romano-barbarian kingdoms. Personal
motives, economic incentives and wars gave rise to unprecedented mobility of individuals as well as whole
tribes, or, more precisely, large warrior groups with their families. Throughout Europe, people of different
origins where brought together and had to find new ways of coexistence. Although in all cases the for-
eigners were a minority whether in Gaul, on the Iberian Peninsula, in Pannonia or in Italy it was they
who ruled the new kingdoms. Migration was always followed by the integration and acculturation of the
immigrants or of the indigenous population. The fusion of different cultures into new communities clearly
is not just a phenomenon of the 20th and 21st centuries, but has been going on since prehistory.
During the years 2002-2005, the European Commissions Directorate General X, under the Culture 2000
programme, supported a Europe-wide project named Foreigners in Early Medieval Europe, aimed at
realising a database of the relevant archaeological material for the World Wide Web. As a spin-off of the
project, a scientific network was created, and almost all of the ten teams decided to continue their research
on the topic and to participate in a joint publication. This had three reasons: first, the progress made during
the collection of the material for the database and the discussions during the workshops put all colleagues
in touch with fresh ideas and new results, and second, the structure of the database did not allow the elab-
oration of many interesting details. But most important is the third point, which concerns the nature and
interpretation of the archaeological evidence. In the various parts of Europe the archaeological sources
differ considerably, and so it soon became clear that there could be no standard method for defining for-
eigners and their position in society. In each case it was necessary to decide anew how to interpret alien
grave forms and burial customs, foreign burial rites and imported goods. Do the finds really represent for-
eign immigrants, or do they result from other forms of mobility? In some cases it is impossible to identify
foreign individuals, even when it is certain that the archaeological evidence reflects population change.
The articles in this volume highlight different aspects of mobility and exchange, but all of these depend on
contacts between people and groups of people. Studies of straightforward imports, art styles and history
of colonisation or simply new interpretations of common knowledge offer new insights. Knowledge,
objects and ideas do not move by themselves. They are always carried by people. Any study of diffusion
and interaction is therefore confronted with the question: who travelled, for what reason, and how many
were they?*
It was quite clear from the beginning that archaeologists from different European countries, ranging from
Spain to Slovakia and Greece to Sweden, have quite diverse perspectives and different scientific traditions
* K. Kristiansen, Theorising Diffusion and Population Movements. In: C. Renfrew / P. Bahn (eds.), Archaeology. The key concepts (Lon-
don 2005) 75-79 esp. 77.
VII
in approaching a theme like Foreigners in Early Medieval Europe. This in itself offered an interesting basis
for debate. It is also why the articles in the publication are arranged according to the authors places of
origin.
I want to thank all authors for their participation in this publication, which all of them did additionally to
their daytime jobs. In the same context I wish to thank the following persons for translations into English:
Dr. Annette Frey, Mainz (translation of Kazanski / Prin), Dr. Valeria Kulcsr, Budapest (Schilling and Vida),
Jonathan Roth, Mainz (Bhme), Folkert Tiarks, Mainz (Quast). Much more than a simple thanks goes to
Xandra Bardet, Groningen, for editing the various strains of European English and for her unsparing
constructive criticism. For scans and illustrations I want to thank Michael Ober, Vera Kasshlke, Monika
Weber (all RGZM, Mainz). The publishers work was done by Manfred Albert and Michael Braun. They too
deserve many thanks. And, last but not least, special thanks to Martin Schnfelder for his support.
Dieter Quast
Mainz, November 2008
VIII
TIVADAR VIDA
The origin of the Christian population that lived under Avarian rule in Pannonia in the last third of the 6th
century, and represented Late Antique culture, has been a matter of interest in historical and archaeological
research for a long time 1. According to one of the views, this numerous and rich population can be con-
sidered to be the successor of the local provincial Roman population, but, up to now, nobody has suc-
ceeded in providing convincing proof of such continuity 2. Given this circumstance, an alternative view ex-
plains the spectacular flourishing of Late Antique culture by the appearance of a new ethnic group settled
here in the second half of the 6th century, originating from the territory of the Byzantine Empire or from
the territory between the northern Adriatic coast and the southern Alps.
Recently found archaeological material reflects the fact that both native and immigrating, foreign Ro-
manised people in Pannonia lived under Avarian rule. So the question is not only whether there is evidence
for the survival of a native provincial Roman population in Pannonia, but also whether the find material of
the Mediterranean immigrants (individual settlers or resettled groups), that is to say, the foreign Ro-
manised people, can be identified.
I believe that on the basis of the ample material coming from new cemetery excavations today, we can
make an attempt at separating the finds of Balkan-Byzantine or northern Italian and Dalmatian settlers
from the indigenous Late Antique material of the Early Avarian Age. Important questions are: what were
the historical circumstances of this settlement of Mediterranean people, where did they settle, and how
were they assimilated in the Carpathian Basin in the last third of the 6th and the early 7th century? My aim,
in the first place, is not to seek out individual cases, foreign individuals, but to achieve an overview of rela-
tions, archaeological phenomena, that cannot be explained purely as is usually done by trade, artisan
or cultural connections, but may reflect the immigration of an ethnic group 3. So my aim has been the
thorough analysis of links with the Western and Eastern Mediterranean among the find material of the
Christian population representing Late Antique culture during the Avarian Age in the Carpathian Basin.
1 The present volume deals with archaeological possibilities for and Germanic people, must have regarded the Eurasian Avari-
identifying foreigners. The archaeology of the Migration ans, who conquered the region in 568, as foreigners. There was
Period and Early Middle Ages of the Carpathian Basin offers a time when researchers of the Avarian Age considered that the
several possibilities for studying the legacy of individuals or eth- defining material culture of the Carpathian Basin was that of
nic groups as carriers of foreign material culture. From an the steppe nomads who immigrated from the East. Strangely
archaeological point of view we define the term foreign ele- enough, it then was the Germanic and Romanised population
ment as a feature of a different material and spiritual culture that was considered to be foreign (Blint 1989, 181, Abb. 82).
appearing sparsely or in small numbers within a given geogra- All this means that while the overemphasised eastern element
phical, ethnic and cultural unit. However, the question is wheth- was thoroughly investigated (Blint 2007) only little attention
er foreign elements evidenced in archaeological material actu- was paid to studying the continuity of the local Romanised and
ally relate to foreign individuals or a foreign community. At the Germanic traditions.
2
same time, the people of ancient times and contemporary Controversial questions were recently summarised by Bierbrauer
archaeological research may differ in their understanding of 2004, 210-242.
3
who is considered foreign, and where and why. The native Brather 2004.
population of the Carpathian Basin, consisting of Romanised
The hypothesis of the continuity of the local provincial Roman population and its coexistence with immi-
grated Balkanian Byzantine elements 4 is not new in the research 5. Joachim Werner concluded this from his
examination of the archaeological data, and, besides, that of the surviving literary evidence 6. Istvn Bna
also reckoned with Western Mediterranean and Italo-Byzantine influence beside the East Roman-Byzantine
traditions, but in his opinion the latter appeared also with the population settled in Pannonia at the begin-
ning of the Avarian Age 7. In the course of his analysis of the find material indicative of Mediterra-
nean/Byzantine relations in the Early Avarian Age, Csand Blint pointed out the possibility of certain
phenomena having different Balkanian and Italian origins 8. va Garam discussed this question in detail,
without drawing any historical conclusions 9.
THEORY OF CONTINUITY
Many researchers have accepted the hypothesis suggested in Andrs Alfldis fundamental monograph,
according to which the Roman provincial population of Pannonia continued to exist in the 5th-7th centuries,
and the flourishing of the so-called Keszthely Culture at the beginning of the Early Avarian Age was due
to the strengthening of local romanitas 10. Various attempts have been made to corroborate this view, but
nobody has yet succeeded in presenting a conclusive argumentation, because of the uncertain dating of
the material 11.
At the beginning, the foederati population that immigrated after 380 lived together with the native Ro-
manised population of a lower social position 12. Today the continuity of the provincial Roman population
in Pannonia can be demonstrated at more and more sites up till the end of the 5th century (Tokod 13, Kesz-
thely 14, Gyr 15, Aquincum 16, Cskvr 17, Budapest-Gazdagrt 18). However, the main difficulty is that from
the end of the 5th century up to the beginning of the Avarian Age in the final third of the 6th century, we
Another research trend does not consider satisfactory the archaeological evidence of the continuity of a
Roman provincial population in the second half of the 5th and the first two thirds of the 6th century in Pan-
nonia, and because of this, it suggests immigration of Romanised communities in the second half of the 6th
century. However, the representatives of this trend have tried to determine the time of this influx on the
basis of historical and not archaeological arguments. According to the most widespread view in Hungarian
research, immigration became possible at the beginning of the Early Avarian Age, when Avars, in the course
of their campaigns, settled deportees (prisoners of war) from the Byzantine Empire in the Carpathian Basin.
We should reckon with such resettlements taking place throughout the Balkan campaigns of the Avars.
Istvn Bna connected the extremely rich find material of the Keszthely-Fenkpuszta fortress with groups
representing Late Antique/Early Byzantine culture brought from the Balkans 24. His hypothesis started from
the assumption that a solid chronological basis was provided by objects dated to the time of Avarian rule,
which could be connected to the people, i.e. prisoners, brought by the Avars from the Balkans and north-
19 Bierbrauer 2003, 210-242; 2004, 51-72. Vida 2007, 323-326. 23 For example, Barkczi 1968, 278-281 pl. 55-56, 59, 61/1-2. V.
20 Bna 1998, 113. Bierbrauer pointed out that the dating of certain finds of the
21 Judging from the anthropological and archaeological material in Keszthely Culture between 568 and ca. 630, as has been sug-
the Langobardian cemetery of Szentendre, I. Bna concluded gested by Hungarian research, is possible only in the case of
the presence of a Romanised population (Bna 1976, 81-82). In female and male graves that convincingly contained also finds
the Hegyk Group, finds of Germanic material as well as finds dated to the Early Avarian Age. In all other cases, the possi-
of the Romanised population were present (Bna 1998, 119- bility of the earlier dating must be left open (Bierbrauer 2004,
120). 51-72).
22 24
Skriba / Sfalvi 2004, 129. Bna 1970, 258 note 122; 1971, 294-297.
HISTORICAL SOURCES
Historical sources only provide some circumstantial evidence regarding the continuity of the Late Roman
population in the 5th-7th centuries. Paulus Diaconus mentions people from Noricum (norici ) and Pannonia
(pannonii) among those moving to Italy together with the Langobardians. This can without doubt refer only
to remnants of the native provincial Romanised population 32. Mentions of some high-ranking Pannonian
25 30
Bna 1971, 257-258 note 122. Mller 1992, 251-307. Blint 1993, 222-233. Garam 2001,
26
Kiss 1992, 247. 178-199. On the literature about the Keszthely Culture, re-
27
Blint 1995, 284. Straub 1999, 206. cently see Bierbrauer 2004, 51-72.
28 31
Barkczi 1971, 187. Italo-Byzantine influence: Bna 1971, 296; Blint 1993, 237,
29
Florin Curta suggested that the construction of the Fenkpuszta 242; 1995, 276. Garam 2001, 11, 192. Riemer 2002, 383-
fortress might be connected with Byzantine missionary activity: 384.
32
Kurta 2002, 57-59; Curta 2005, 189-191. Paulus Diaconus, Historia Langobardorum II. 26.
As we saw above, the written sources suggest that in Pannonia we should, in principle, reckon both with
a native Romanised population and with foreign immigrants. Considering this, archaeological research has
to face a very serious task, which is to identify the find material of the remaining Pannonian Romanised
population and, at the same time, distinguish the legacy of the resettled Balkanian ethnic group with their
33 38
Tth 1974, 269-275. Paulus Diaconus, Historia Langobardorum IV, 37.
34 Gregorius Magnus, Epist. IX. 155. 39 Pohl 1988, 92-93, 231-233. Blint 1993, 226. Daim 2003,
35
Theophylactus Simocatta 7, 10. Johannes Ephesinus, Hist. 473-476.
40
Eccl. VI. 31. Curta 2005, 181-219.
36 41
Blint 1993, 228-231; 1995, 286-287, 291. Pohl 1988, 232-33. Vida 2008, 31-38.
37 Miracula Sancti Demetrii 2, 5, 285.
42 This is evidenced by a gold pin with the inscription BONOSA the Nagyharsny brooch we read: []-
from Keszthely-Fenkpuszta, Horreum cemetery, grave 5. A (Garam 2001, 52). According to other ideas, these
Greek inscription is found on a bulla from Balatonfzf, grave sporadic language traces cannot be employed to identify the
K: ETROC and on a cross from the same place: language spoken by those who used these objects: Blint 1993,
; on a brooch from Nagyharsny and a cross from Zvod 228-229.
(Garam 2001, 265 pl. 14, 1, 289 pl. 38,1292 pl. 41, 3). On
From the last third of the 6th, and throughout the 7th century, the material legacy of Pannonia is connected
in many ways to the western part of the Mediterranean world (northern Italy, Dalmatia, southeastern Alps).
From the late 6th century and during the 7th century in the territories neighbouring on Pannonia in the
region of the Alps and in Italy, the Romanised population no longer observed the custom of burying
without grave-goods 43. Due to these cultural contacts, this Romanised population can be well examined
and traced in the region between the Carpathian Basin and Italy. I shall illustrate the Western Mediterra-
nean contacts with some particular examples.
43
In the 5th-6th centuries, Romanised Christians were usually bur- number of ornaments and costume accessories; in the burials of
ied without grave goods. Women were buried with a reduced men we at best find buckles (Bierbrauer 2003, 210-242).
Earrings with basket-shaped pendants are characteristic ornaments of the Late Antique material culture,
which were produced in several regional workshops in the Mediterranean (type Allach; fig. 1). Although
the research calls these earrings Byzantine earrings, their occurrence in the heartland of Byzantium is
sporadic. Perhaps it is due to the state of research, that up till now they have been found mainly in contexts
of the 6th and 7th centuries in Italy, the eastern Alps, and Dalmatia. Examples from the 5th century, which
can be considered the prototypes, are found in the same areas 44. Morphologically, earrings with basket-
shaped pendants from the Carpathian Basin can be related to northern Italian and eastern Alpine pieces 45,
and their workshops presumably were in the same regions. At Teurnia (Carinthia), grave 31, found in the
44 Bierbrauer 1987, 148. Ibler 1991, 44-52. Possenti 1994. 45 Garam 2001, 15-18.
Riemer 2000, 45-64. Tomka, 2004, 395 fig. 8.
Recently, research has pointed out western Balkanian and Italian formal, technological and iconographic
connections of disc brooches of the Early Avarian Age Keszthely Culture, decorated with Christian icono-
graphic motifs (fig. 2) 48. So far, similar pieces have not been reported from the eastern part of the Mediter-
ranean. Also connections with their Antique iconographic prototypes and contemporary Early Christian
parallels have been revealed 49. As for parallels of the image of a galloping rider (Christ) defeating a serpent,
a new example is known from a medallion found in grave 12 of the Sicilian Basilica Sofiana 50. In the case of
the hollow disc brooches, it was recently suggested that these could have contained secondary relics, pil-
grimage souvenirs (wax, soil, plants) 51, brought home by their wearers from pilgrimages to the Mediterra-
nean.
Dove-, peacock- and cock-shaped brooches were part of the 5th- and 6th-century Romanised female
costume in the region of the Alps, northern Italy and Dalmatia. On the basis of recent studies, we can hardly
doubt that these brooches were Christian symbols and related to personal beliefs and the Christian
character of a community (fig. 3) 52. All these suggestions are indirectly supported by the observation that
the distribution area of the bird-shaped brooches in the region of the eastern Alps coincides with that of
Early Christian churches. People wearing these brooches could learn about the Christian doctrine in these
churches, and the dove-, peacock- and cock-shaped brooches directly related to their personal faith. From
the same territory we also know cross-shaped brooches, the Christian symbolism of which is obvious.
In several Pannonian graves of the Early Avarian Age, as in the eastern Alpine region and Italy, moulded
and bird-shaped plate brooches have been found in a position relating to the contemporary costume. The
Christian symbolism of the dove-shaped brooch is directly supported by the silver dove-shaped brooch
decorated with a cross 53, found in grave 16 of the Keszthely-Fenkpuszta-Pusztaszentegyhzi dl ceme-
46 50
The Teurnia assemblage is in many ways connected with the Adamesteanu 1963, 270 fig. 24.
51
Late Antique finds from the vicinity of Keszthely: Glaser / Gugl Daim 2002, 113-132. Vida 2002, 184.
52
1996, 22 fig. 6; 23. The dove is the symbol of crucifixion and of Christ; the peacock
47 Riemer 2000, 45-64; Garam 2001, 15-18. Sind die Krb- of Paradise; the cock, as the witness of Peters denial, is the sym-
chenohrringe daher im strengen Sinn tatschlich als byzanti- bol of sin and punishment, the Resurrection and vigilance: Bier-
nische Schmuckform anzusprechen oder ist hier der von Garam brauer 2002, 210-215; 2005, 58-66.
53
in ihrer Einleitung angefhrte italo-byzantinische Einfluss spr- The author sees a connection between the brooch and the con-
bar? Riemer 2002, 384. tinuous Romanised population in the region between Noricum
48
Garam 1993, 99-134; 2001, 51-56. Daim 2002, 113-124. Mediterraneum and Dalmatia: Straub 2002, 103-111 fig. 1.
49 54
Glaser 2002, 145-152. Tth 2005, 183-202. Straub 2002, 104, 108 note 7.
tery. On the basis of its shape, this type of brooch could be dated to the 5th or 6th century in the Mediter-
ranean, but at Keszthely this piece was radiocarbon-dated to the late 6th or early 7th century 54. Another
moulded dove brooch was found in grave 1, unearthed at the northern tower of the Keszthely-Fenkpuszta
fortress 55.
In 6th- and 7th-century burials we often encounter bird- and horse-shaped Roman provincial brooches on
the breast, where they were worn. These brooches, found on the breast with unbroken pins, were
obviously used functionally, for fastening a garment. At the same time, they served as Christian symbols,
like the pieces made in the 5th-7th centuries. In grave 67 of the Cskberny cemetery a Roman, moulded,
dove-shaped bronze brooch was found in the place where it was worn, with an unbroken pin 56. There is
57 The majority of animal-shaped brooches are products of the 66 Keszthely: Mller 1999, 176 Abb. 7, 84:1. Bierbrauer 1987,
Roman Period, and were fashionable also later: Riemer 2000, 150-152 fig. 22.
67
109-115. Bierbrauer 1987, 161-162. Barkczi 1994, 24-92.
58 68
Erdlyi / Nmeth 1969, pl. 15,2. The possibility of the existence of a Romanised population is
59 Zamrdi: LOro 2000, 81 cat. 74; 111 cat. 86. also suggested in Garams study of the find material of Byzan-
60
Byzanz, Cat. Mnchen 2004, 275 no. 419. tine character of the Avarian Age, but the origin of this popula-
61
Castel Trosino, Cat. 1995, 316-317 fig. 258. tion is not examined, nor is the possibility of its native origin
62 Straub 1999, 201-202. referred to (Garam 2001, 178-99).
63 Bierbrauer 1987, 159 fig. 27. Brozzi 1989, 83 pl. 12. 69 Bierbrauer 2004, 56-67. Vida 2008, 31-38.
64 70
Ptuj: Vinski 1968, pl. 8, 39-40. Sesto al Rhegina: Brozzi 1989, E.g. in Keszthely-Fenkpuszta, grave 8, 472 pieces; in grave 9,
83 pl. 12, 4. Keszthely-Fenkpuszta, cemetery at the southern 287 pieces; in grave 14, 985 pieces; in grave 17 ten pieces of
fortress wall: Mller 1999, 172 fig. 3, 11:1. small gold tubes that presumably adorned a hair-net (Barkczi
65 Bierbrauer 1987, 147-149 fig. 211. Riemer 2000, 45-64. 1968).
Another group of objects that can be connected to Late Antique culture shows Eastern Mediterranean rela-
tions in 6th- and 7th-century Pannonia. These are mostly objects whose geographical distribution concen-
trates on the territory of the Byzantine Empire. Outside it they are not, or only rarely found. Researchers
allow for strong Byzantine influence on the periphery of the Byzantine Empire, including the Avarian
Empire. However, it proved only partly possible to show convincingly which objects may be considered
original Byzantine ones or indeed local imitations, and what is the cultural, social, ethnic and historical sig-
nificance of these objects in terms of the material culture of the Avarian Age. Studies dealing with the find
material of Byzantine character from the Avarian Age show a marked change of attitude in the last decades.
Since then the clarification of some methodological questions has become possible 71. We have to distin-
guish local phenomena from broader, regional ones. The most important question is that of distinguishing
the original Byzantine objects, the local imitations and pieces representing further development 72.
Byzantine influence observed in the material culture of the Avarian-Age population is the result of
contemporary fashions. For the Avarian elite, Byzantine objects played a representative role. Both Avarian
and Byzantine craftsmen produced for the barbarians huge numbers of multi-piece belt sets, earrings with
spherical decorations and bracelets. In the case of several representative objects I would suggest that they
were not made in the territory of the Avarian Empire by Avarian goldsmiths, but reached the elite as diplo-
matic gifts or simply as booty (pseudo-buckles, the Kunbbony buckle). The belt with pseudo-buckle from
Sirmium shows that Byzantine smiths made objects of similar style for the Avarian and East European bar-
barian elite (Mala Pereepina, Glodosy, Kelegeja) 73. At the same time, find material uncovered in Avarian
territory, as well as the material from goldsmiths burials of the Avarian Age, shows that local workshops
producing Byzantine-style objects were established from an early date 74.
We have to distinguish from these objects of representative value and their local imitations, a smaller group
of Byzantine finds of the Early Avarian Age comprising original Byzantine objects whose technique and
shape, simplicity and commonplace function (pins, brooches, buckles) would not favour imitation. This
group includes pins with a bird-shaped head, which I shall discuss below, the Yassi Ada-type buckles and
the Byzantine brooches with inverted foot. Within the Empire, these mainly bronze and iron, rarely silver
objects belonged to the provincial Byzantine culture, to the sphere of the common people. Given their
material, technique and small number, they cannot represent a traded commodity; they would have turned
up outside the Empire only together with their wearers. I believe that such simple objects or symbols might
well belong to the first generation of common people or prisoners deported from the Balkans. They did not
hold any prestige value, so in the new Pannonian environment nobody imitated them, which is why the
second generation did not wear them.
In the territory of 6th- and 7th-century Pannonia, several dress pins adorned with a figure of a bird have been
found. These are connected with Eastern Mediterranean traditions. Pins with bird decoration found in grave
71 Blint 1993; 1995. Garam 2001. and decoration, was published as an Avarian belt by I. Popovi
72 Riemer 2002, 383-386. (1997).
73 74
Byzantine artisans served the tastes of the barbarian elite to a In the case of other high-status objects it has been suggested
high degree, so that, for example, the Sirmium belt, each ele- that they were actually made in the Avarian Empire, but faith-
ment of which is characterised by Byzantine technology, shape fully copying Byzantine prototypes (Garam 2001, 178-199).
79 of the Szekszrd-Bogyiszli t cemetery, in graves 34 and 98 at the southern wall of the Keszthely-
Fenkpuszta fortress, and in the cemeteries excavated at Lesencetomaj, were encountered on the middle
of the breast, where they were worn. According to Late Antique costume traditions, they served to fasten
the veil or shawl (see find list 1).
Basically, pins with birds can be traced to prototypes of the Roman Period. Some finds (Sisak/Siscia,
Lepenski Vir, Magdalensberg) show that pins topped with bird figures could be found in a Late Roman envi-
ronment as early as the 4th and 5th centuries 75, but, judging from the finds, this custom did not become
common in the Western Mediterranean territories. This does not mean that they are not found at all at
Early Christian sites, as is evidenced by the finds from Kilpatrick (Ireland) and Whitby (England) 76. A pin with
a dove, exhibited in the Ariadne Galleries, is said to be of Hispanian origin and to date from the Visigothic
Age(?) (6th century) 77. It is surprising that in the 5th-6th centuries pins with bird decoration do not feature
in the western parts of the Mediterranean, Italy 78, the region of the eastern Alps or the Iberian Peninsula.
They instead come from the eastern territories of the Byzantine Empire, the Balkans, Asia Minor, the Near
East and Egypt, but they have also been found in the territory of Azerbaijan and Armenia (figs. 4-6).
The bird figures on the pins in question usually represent doves, rarely cocks. Peacocks only occasionally
appear. The shape of the beaks clearly shows that these are not birds of prey. Morphologically, pins deco-
rated with birds can be traced back to Roman prototypes, and, as with the bird-shaped brooches of the
Roman Period, we have to reckon with a change of meaning, as the dove, a pagan symbol, became a
Christian one.
77 78
The head of this delicate silver pin takes the form of a dove, beau- Ibler 1991. Riemer 2000.
tifully realised, with folded wings (Treasures 1991, 90 no. 146).
The Mediterranean spread of pins and finger distaffs decorated with a bird figure and sometimes with a
cross, was analysed by Thomas Vlling in connection with a find from Olympia (Greece). On certain pieces
the bird is represented together with a cross (e.g. Prahovo/Aquis), which makes it possible to interpret the
bird as an Early Christian symbol 79. The finger distaff had a symbolical meaning already in the Roman Period.
It used to be the symbol of female virtue, of the lady of the house. It was frequently placed in burials and
depicted on gravestones. In the Early Byzantine period distaffs continued to occur, but its earlier pagan
(Venus) or purely ornamental elements were replaced by Christian symbols. A great number of similar finds
are known from the territory of the Eastern Mediterranean, and are usually associated with Christianity 80.
However, some new studies with a down-to-earth approach have thrown doubt on the Early Christian asso-
ciations of the distaffs with bird-shaped terminals 81. Any doubts about the connection of the birds on the
finger distaffs with Christian symbolism were clearly dispelled by three recently published pieces from the
Chr. Schmidt Collection. An Eastern Mediterranean piece with a Greek cross on the end demonstrates that
79 Vlling 1996, 145-154. 81 According to G. Knig, finger distaffs with bird-shaped ends
80 According to O. Bozus observations, this object has Christian had neither pagan nor Christian significance, but symbolised
symbolism and the type was very widespread in the Balkans the female sphere in the house: Knig 1987, 129-137; Rau
(Bozu 1993, 206-214; Vlling 1996, 145-154; Kazanski 2003, 2006, 83.
33; 99 pl. 25; 104, pl. 30 no. 293).
distaffs as tools with a profane function may be decorated with a sacral, that is to say, Christian symbol 82.
On the end of another Eastern Mediterranean distaff, there is a peacock with a cross on its head instead
of its crest 83. In the third case, we see a dove on the top of a cross set on a rectangular ciborium 84. On an
ivory pin from Al-Fayyum, Egypt, dated to the 5th or 6th century, we see the opposite situation: the dove is
placed on an aedicula containing a sphere, a cross decorating its head 85. The association of the dove with
Christ is obvious on a pin of Syrian origin from the Chr. Schmidt Collection. Here also a cross is placed on
82 Byzanz, Cat. Paderborn 2001, 348 no. 98.1. Byzanz, Cat. 84 Byzanz, Cat. Paderborn 2001, 348 no. 98.3. Byzanz, Cat.
Mnchen 2004, 274 no. 412. Mnchen 2004, 274 no. 414.
83 Byzanz, Cat. Paderborn 2001, 348 no. 98.2. Byzanz, Cat. 85 Mumienportraits 1998, 239 no. 190.
Mnchen 2004, 274 no. 413.
In the Late Antique period, the belt had an important symbolic meaning in the apparel of both men and
women. Only people of deprived status would appear without a belt buckle. Belt material, size and deco-
ration of the metallic parts of the belt reflected the financial and indeed social status of the owner (fig. 8) 91.
In the Carpathian Basin of the Avarian Age, the majority of the find material thought to show Byzantine
influence is composed of buckles. Original Byzantine buckles made of precious metals or bronze could
reach the Avars through plunder, diplomatic gifts, taxes and trade, and the same was the situation with
other people living on the periphery of the Byzantine Empire. In a number of cases we seem to be dealing
with local production of buckles after original models 92. As a result, certain decorated types became stan-
dardised international fashions, so their dispersion reveals nothing about the origin of the individuals
wearing these buckles. The spread of the pieces of the 7th century made of precious metals or bronze was
influenced primarily by the fashions of the time and by trading connections. Pieces made of precious metals
were worn by a fairly small group of a higher social position, while the common people wore the simpler
bronze buckles.
A number of Byzantine buckle types, reflecting the impact of Byzantine culture beyond the Empires borders
and becoming international fashion items, can be found both in the Mediterranean and in European terri-
tories bordering the Empire 93. By contrast, the distribution of other types is limited exclusively to the terri-
86 Byzanz, Cat. Mnchen 2004, 349 no. 770. 89 Deichmann 1989, fig. 67.
87 In the Western and Eastern Mediterranean world, the dove is 90 In the cemetery of Mnchen-Aubing, grave 64a, the pin with a
frequently found together with a depiction of the cross (Byzanz, bird was found above the skull, so it could be a hairpin worn
Cat. Paderborn 2001, 82 no. I.4; 85 no. I.6.); on a bronze lamp, according to the Merovingian German custom: Dannheimer
and on the top of the cross we see a dove (Byzanz, Cat. Pader- 1998, 90 pl. 6,G1; pl. 126, 64a.
91
born 2001, 211 no. II.6) Schulze-Drrlamm 2002, 2-3.
88 Peacocks and doves were frequently depicted together also on 92 Garam 2001, 88-113.
93
the lunula-shaped earrings (Byzanz, Cat. Paderborn 2001, 318). Schulze-Drrlamm 2002, 176 fig. 62 (types D9 and D12).
tory of the Byzantine Empire; that is to say, they did not become international products and therefore none
of them reached northerly regions like the Carpathian Basin 94. In this light, it is strange that certain Byzan-
tine buckles, besides occurring in the Mediterranean, show a distinct concentration in the Carpathian Basin.
We find several further specimens only along the Lower Danube. In this case it is obvious that we are obser-
ving the activity of one or more local workshops emulating the Byzantine example 95.
In the case of some Byzantine buckles of the Early Avarian Age, we see evidence of close Mediterranean
contacts. In the late 6th and early 7th century, these types reached the Carpathian Basin only in small
numbers. Some pieces among them could be part of war booty, but several can be plausibly connected
with the Balkanian settlers 96. This is supported by the definitely poor technological quality of the Sucidava-
94 Schulze-Drrlamm 2002, 198 fig. 71 (type D22); 191 fig. 67 96 Sucidava type: Garam, 2001, 95-97, 312 pl. 61. Budakalsz
(type D20). grave 1550, a kidney-shaped buckle was found together with a
95 Garam 2003, 108-113. Type Taschenschnalle D36: Schulze- rectangular open-work plate: Schulze-Drrlamm type B16:
Drrlamm 2002, 226 fig. 82. Schulze-Drrlamm 2002, 69 fig. 25; 72-75.
In Pannonian cemeteries of the Early Avarian Age, several Early Byzantine brooches with inverted foot were
found. Among them, pieces made both of silver-and-bronze and of solid silver were discovered 102. Similar
brooches can be found in great numbers in the 5th-6th centuries in the fortified towns of the Lower Danube,
in the Balkans and in the Pontic region (fig. 9) 103. In grave 28 of the cemetery of Keszthely-Fenkpuszta,
at the southern fortress wall, a brooch was uncovered at the neck of a buried woman, in a position sug-
gestive of the Late Antique female costume, similar to that of the Balkanian provincial-Byzantine territo-
ries 104. The surface of this brooch with inverted foot was decorated with a cross consisting of semicircular
punched motifs. This may refer to the Christian religion of the buried person. In this case, we have a new
97 Garam 2001, 97. cases this may even relate to the mobility of individuals. In
98 Womer / Katzev 1982, 277. The Byzantine shipwreck found in grave 304 of the Budakalsz cemetery, a Yassi Ada-type buckle
the region of Yassi Ada was dated by bronze coins, the closing was found together with a Late Antique (Byzantine?) orange-
date of which was 625/626 (Fagerilie 1982, 145-154). A find yellow ceramic bottle unique in the Carpathian Basin, and a
list of the buckle type was published by Kiss 1996, 207, 311 Liste Late Antique earring with bead pendant.
102
10. Garam 2003, 101-103 fig. 5. The brooch from Bogojevo is of
99 Schulze-Drrlamm 2002. the Roman Period, it is not Late Antique.
100 103 Brooches are dated to the second half of the 6th century by the
According to Igor Gavritukhin (pers. comm., Moscow, 2007)
this buckle type is not found in Eastern Europe among the coins of Iustinus I, Iustinianus I and II. Uenze 1992, 146-154;
usual Byzantine imported goods, and only a single find is Teodor 1997, 69-91; Gavrituchin 2002, 229-250; 2003, 197-
known from Belorussia. 206.
101 104 Mller 1999, 173 fig. 4,28:1.
It would not be an exaggeration to suggest that in certain
type of object associated with Mediterranean Late Antique costume and the presence of Christianity, which
also originated from the Mediterranean. In the case of the Byzantine brooches with inverted foot, we may
infer mobility of an Eastern Mediterranean person only in cases when in the same burial several archaeo-
logical phenomena relate to the Mediterranean region (fig. 10).
However, the Byzantine brooches with inverted foot, especially some silver specimens, also reached groups
of the Early Avarian Age who lacked any Late Antique cultural traditions. They did not wear them in accord-
ance with the Mediterranean custom. In several cases Byzantine brooches with inverted foot were found
at the bodys hand, or in the region of the femur and the pelvis (Budakalsz 105, Budapest 106, Klked A 107,
105 107
Budakalsz-Dunapart, graves 420, 1566: Unpublished excava- Brooches were found on the right-hand side of the pelvis: Kl-
tion by A. Psztor A. and T. Vida 1988-1992. ked-Feketekapu A, graves 491 and 492: Kiss 1996, 132, 503
106
Budapest-Pusztadombi utca 12, grave 9: Nagy 1999, vol. 1: 28- pl. 89/A 491,7; pl. 89/A 492,3.
29 fig. 11; vol. 2: 147 pl. 139,1.
Klked B 108). Judging from the position of the brooches observed in womens graves, we may suggest several
functions. At the pelvis, such brooches could be attached to the belt or fasten the dress. They could serve for
the suspension of purses and knife-sheaths, or for the decoration of Germanic-type ornamental pendants. As
amulets they could belong to the contents of a womans purse 109. In grave 85 of the Klked B cemetery, a
silver brooch was attached to the belt-pendant. All these observations show that Germanic women in
Pannonia did not use these brooches of Byzantine type in the Mediterranean fashion, for fastening garments
on the breast. In accordance with their own customs, they fixed the brooches to their belt-pendants.
CONCLUSIONS
The Pannonian Late Antique find material shows an intriguing duality, comprising both Western and
Eastern Mediterranean influences. In my opinion, the presence of Western Mediterranean features indi-
108 Klked-Feketekapu B, graves 85 and 438: Kiss 2001, vol. 1: 35, 109 Garam 2003, 102-103.
140-141; vol. 2: 44 pl. 30, 45; 95 pl. 81/B438,1.
110
It is a subject of debate for how long West Pannonia, the of Keszthely from the mid-6th century onwards (Curta 2005,
region of Balaton, preserved its status inherited from the Ro- 184). In my opinion, the historical and archaeological sources
man Period, and for how long Italian control was maintained, cannot unequivocally prove that the church at Keszthely Fenk-
if only in an indirect way. Lszl Barkczi suggested a line along puszta was an episcopal basilica. The rich stone materials are
Sirmium-Pcs-Keszthely-Fenkpuszta-Sopron outlining the part missing, which one would expect with an episcopal complex.
112
that was mainly under Italian cultural influence (Barkczi 1971, Vida 2008, 13-46.
113
189). See note 42.
111 Scythia Minor, Moesia, Thrace, Epirus Nova, Dacia Mediterra- 114 Hungarian research puts the early phase of the Keszthely Cul-
nea. According to Florin Curta, the aisled Keszthely-Fenk- ture between 568-630 and interprets on a historical basis.
puszta church could have been an episcopal basilica represen- According to this argumentation, the starting point of the
ting a well-organised Christian community with distant rela- Keszthely Culture is the departure of the Langobardians to Italy
tions (Menas flask), which had been established in the vicinity (AD 568): Bierbrauer 2004, 51-72.
Find list 1: Pins with bird-shaped head from the Eastern Mediterranean,
dated between the 4th and 7th centuries AD
Armenia Hungary
Krym 2003, 429 tab. 143, 22. Gyenesdis (Dis): Hampel 1905/I, 383-384, fig. 1047.
Keszthely-Fenk: Hampel 1905/I, 383-384, fig. 1046.
Austria Keszthely-Fenkpuszta, Cemetery at the south wall,
Magdalensberg: Deimel 1987, pl. 50; Vlling 1996, graves 34 and 93: Mller 1999, 174 fig. 5, 34/1; 177
148 note 19. fig. 98/3.
Lesencetomaj-Piroskereszt: Permi 2005, 31.
Azerbaijan Szekszrd-Bogyiszli t, grave 79: Rosner 1999, 172
Krym 2003, 457 tab. 171, 41. pl. 6, 79/1.
Bulgaria Ireland
Augusta: Popilian 1976, 243 note 127. Kilpatrick, Co. Westmeath: Swan 1995, 76 fig. 2, e; 77
Kjustendil: Ivanov 1919/20, 105 fig. 76; Popilian 1976, fig. 3, e.
243 note 123.
Krivina/Iatrus: Gomolka-Fuchs 1982/II, 154 pl. 64 no. Israel
286. Jerusalem: Thusingham 1985, 423 fig. 71, 32; 424 fig.
Sadovec: Uenze 1992, pl. 122, 10. 72, 3.
Croatia Serbia
Sisak/Siscia: Simoni 1989, 109, 128 pl. 2, 2-3. Cariin Grad/Iustiniana Prima: Kondi / Popovi 1977,
201 pl. 16, 59.
Lepenski Vir: Srejovi 1989, 198, pl. 1, 7.
Egypt
Achmm-Panopolis: Forrer 1893, pl. 9, 10; 10,2. Kind
Slovenia
information B. Tobis.
Tonovcov Grad: Bitenc / Knific 2001, 41, cat. nr. 114.
Al-Fayyum: Mumienportraits 1998, 239 no. 190.
Kind information Dvid Bartus.
Spain
Visigothic (?): Treasures 1991, 90 no. 146.
Germany
Mnchen-Aubing, grave 64a: Dannheimer 1998, 90
Syria
pl. 6, G1; pl. 126/64a.
Hama: Ploug et al. 1969, 73 fig. 28, 3-7, 19; fig. 29, 4.
Syria: Byzanz, Cat. Mnchen 2004, 349 no. 770.
Great Britain
Whitby, North Yorkshire: Swan 1995, 78 fig. 4. Turkey
Boazky/Hattua: Boehmer 1972, 95 pl. 24, 590; Ne-
Greece ve 1991, 91-111. Kind information . Bollk.
Corinth: Davidson 1952, pl. 89 no. 1500; pl. 116 no. Phrygia: Haspels 1951, pl. 4/b,4.
2290; pl. 119 no. 2354-2356.
Greece: Museum of Fine Arts Boston no. 20184; Collection Stathatos no. 242a-b: Orlandos 1963, 290 pl.
Jacobsthal 1956, 62 no. 261. 46, 242a-b.
Bulgaria Israel
Svisthov/Novae: Dimitrov et al. 1970, 70 pl. 22, g. Monte Nebo: Saller 1941, 312 fig. 2/4, pl. 137.
Italy
Cyprus Rome: Kiss 1996, 311.
Salamine: Chavane 1975, 161 no. 464, pl. 46.
Serbia
Cariingrad/Iustiniana Prima: Kondi / Popovi 1977,
Egypt
192 Taf. 9,19,21.)
Edfu: Bnazeth 1992, 211; AF 1435.
Jelica: Milinkovi 2001, 89, fig. 15, 3.
Kostolac/Viminacium (Lok. Svetinja): Popovi 1987, 25,
Greece 31 ref. 114; fig. 19/4.
Delos: Deonna 1938, 296 no. B1163, pl. 88/758. Narodni Muzej, Leskovac, no. 958: Kiss 1996, 311.
Samos: Jantzen 2004, pl. 20. 744a-b, 745.
Turkey
Anemurium: Russel 1982, type 4, no. 7-8 fig. 6, 7-8.
Hungary Antioch: Russel 1982, 142 note 39.
Budakalsz-Dunapart, grave 504 (Unpublished excava- Istanbul-Sarahane: Gill 1986, 264 no. 558 fig. 400.
tion by A. Psztor / T. Vida 1989) Pergamon: Gaitzsch 2005, pl. 51, SN12.
Klked-Feketekapu A graves 66 and 291: Kiss 1996, Phrygia: Haspels 1951, 95, 151 pl. 4/d, 4.
34, 84, 477 pl. 63/A291. Sardis: Waldbaum 1983, 121 no. 704 pl. 44.
Vrpalota-Gimnzium, grave 182: Erdlyi / Nmet 1969, Yassi Ada: Womer / Katzev 1982, 275-277 fig. 12-5;
184-185, pl. 50/10. 12-6 MF 21.
REFERENCES
Adamesteanu 1963: D. Adamesteanu, Cronaca darte. Nuovi do- rungsverhltnisse am Plattensee. Jahrbuch RGZM 18, 1971,
cumenti paleocristiani nella Sicilia centro-meridionale. Bolletino 179-191.
dArte 48, 1963, 259-273.
1994: L. Barkczi, Beitrge zur Geschichte der Provinz Valeria im
Alfldi 1926: A. Alfldi, Der Untergang der Rmerherrschaft in IV.-VI. Jahrhundert. Specimina Nova 10/1, 1994, 24-92.
Pannonien 2. Ungarische Bibliothek 12 (Berlin, Leipzig 1926).
Bass / von Doornick 1982: G. F. Bass / F. H. von Doornick, Yassi
Blint 1989: Cs. Blint, Archologie der Steppe (Wien, Kln 1989). Ada I. A 7th Century Byzantine Shipwreck (Austin 1982).
1993: Cs. Blint, Probleme der awarischen Landnahme. In: M.
Bnazeth 1992: D. Bnazeth, Lart du mtal au dbut de lre cr-
Mller-Wille / R. Schneider (eds.), Ausgewhlte Probleme euro-
tienne. Muse du Louvre, Catalogue du dpartement des anti-
pischen Landnahmen des Frh- und Hochmittelalters. Metho-
quits gyptiennes (Paris 1992).
dischen Grundlagendiskussion zwischen Archologie und Ge-
schichte. Vol. I. Vortrge und Forschungen XLI (Sigmaringen Bierbrauer 1987: V. Bierbrauer, Invillino-Ibligo in Friaul I. Die rmi-
1993) 195-273. sche Siedlung und das sptantik-frhmittelalterliche Castrum.
Mnchner Beitrge zur Vor- und Frhgeschichte 33 (Mnchen
1995: Cs. Blint, Kelet, a korai avarok s Biznc kapcsolatai.
1987).
Rgszeti tanulmnyok. Magyar strtneti Knyvtr 8 (Szeged
1995). 2002: V. Bierbrauer, Fibeln als Zeugnisse persnlichen Christen-
2007: Cs. Blint, On oriental preference in the archaeological tums sdlich und nrdlich der Alpen im 5. bis 9. Jh. Acta Prae-
research on the Avars, proto-Bulgarians and conquering Hungar- historica et Archaeologica 34, 2002, 209-224.
ians. In: J. Henning (ed.), Post-Roman Towns, Trade and Settle- 2003: Reallexikon fr Germanischen Altertumskunde 25 (Berlin
ment in Europe and Byzantium. Vol. 1: The Heirs of the Roman 2003) 210-242 s.v. Romanen (V. Bierbrauer).
West. Millennium Studies 5/1 (Berlin, New York 2007) 545-562.
2004: V. Bierbrauer, Die Keszthely-Kultur und die romanische
Barkczi 1968: L. Barkczi, A 6th century cemetery from Keszthely-
Kontinuitt in Westungarn (5.-8. Jh.). Neue berlegungen zu
Fenkpuszta. Acta Archaeologica Academiae Scientiarum Hun-
einem alten Problem. In: H. Seibert / G. Thoma (eds.): Von Sach-
garicae 20, 1968, 275-311.
sen bis Jerusalem. Menschen und Institutionen im Wandel der
1971: L. Barkczi, Das Grberfeld von Keszthely-Fenkpuszta Zeit. Festschrift fr Wolfgang Giese zum 65. Geburtstag (Mn-
aus dem 6. Jahrhundert und die frhmittelalterlichen Bevlke- chen 2004) 51-72.
Simoni 1989: K. Simoni, Funde aus der Vlkerwanderungszeit in Vinski 1968: Z. Vinski, Krtoliki nakit epohe seoba naroda u Jugo-
den Sammlungen des Archologischen Museums in Zagreb. slavii (Kreuzfrmiger Schmuck der Vlkerwanderungszeit in Ju-
Vjesnik Arheolokog Muzeja u Zagrebu 22, 1989, 107-134. goslawien) Vjesnik Arheolokog Muzeja u Zagrebu 3, 1968,
103-166.
Skriba / Sfalvi 2004: P. Skriba / A. Sfalvi, Langobard telepls
Balatonlelle hatrban Eine Langobardensiedlung in der Ge- Vlling 1996: T. Vlling, Der Vogel auf dem Kreuz. Ein frhchrist-
markung von Balatonlelle. Archaeologiai rtest 129, 2004, liches Symbol aus Olympia. Archologischer Anzeiger 1996, 145-
121-163. 154.
Srejovi 1984: D. Srejovi, Lepenski Vir. Rimska kula Tour ro- Waldbaum 1983: J. C. Waldbaum, Metalwork from Sardis. Ar-
maine. Starinar 33-34, 1982-1983 (1984), 196-199. chaeological Exploration of Sardis, Monograph 8 (Cambridge,
Massachusetts, London 1983).
Straub 1999: P. Straub, A Keszthely-kultra kronolgiai s etnikai
htternek jabb alternatvja. Zalai Mzeum 9, 1999, 195- Werner 1986: J. Werner, Der Schatzfund von Vrap in Albanien.
224. Studien zur Archologie der Awaren 2 (Wien 1986).
2002: P. Straub, Eine frhawarenzeitliche Taubenfibel mit christ- Womer-Katzev 1982: S.W. Womer-Katzev, Miscellaneous Finds. In:
lichem Symbol von Keszthely-Fenkpuszta. Zalai Mzeum 11, Bass / von Doornick 1982, 266-295.
2002, 103-111.
Zsidi 1987: P. Zsidi, A Budapest XI. kerleti Gazdagrten feltrt 4-
Swan 1995: L. Swan, Fine Metalwork from the Early Christian Site 5. szzadi temet Das auf dem Gazdagrt (Budapest XI, Bzr.)
at Kilpatrick, Co Westmeath. In: C. Bourke (ed.), From the Isles erschlossene Grberfeld aus dem 4.-5. Jahrhundert. Communi-
of the North: Medieval Art in Ireland and Britain. International cationes Archaeologicae Hungariae 1987, 45-72.
Name
Address
Postcode, City
Date Signature
Bank
Date Signature
H By bank transfer immediately after the invoice has been received (Germany and other countries)
Other countries:
Netto price 14, ; postage 5, ; bank charge 7,70
There are no bank charges if a European standard transfer with IBAN and BIC is used
(IBAN: DE 08 5519 0000 0020 9860 14; BIC: MVBM DE 55), if you transfer the money through a post giro account or through an
international money order.
The Rmisch-Germanische Zentralmuseum is not liable to tax on sales and therefore does not charge VAT.
or mail it to
Verlag des Rmisch-Germanischen Zentralmuseums
z. Hd. Frau M. Penno
Ernst-Ludwig-Platz 2
55116 Mainz