Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
250
A. Limper, H. Keuter,
and C. Ruter, Paderborn
Experimental results
Ingredients
The carbon black N 650 was conveyed in a
pneumatic conveying system to obtain different amounts of fines content. About
500 kg each was conveyed several times
in the system in every experiment to
achieve different values of fines content.
Since the material had to be delivered in
bags to the mixing line, a small deviation
to the original process had to be accepted:
In a normal production set up the carbon
black is added to the mixer using air with
an adjustable velocity between 5 and
40 m/s. Usually this ends up in some degree of fluidisation of the carbon black resulting in an impaired carbon black incorporation. In our case, an intermediate
packaging step for the carbon black was
used.
The compound formulation (Table 1) is typical for household appliance seals. An oil
extended amorphous EPDM type having
a Mooney viscosity of 48 MU (at 100 8C),
an ethylene content of 56 wt.% and an
ENB content of 4.1 wt.% was used.
Mixing equipment
The mixing experiments were done on a
Werner & Pfleiderer GK 90 E internal mixer
with a chamber volume of 90 L and intermeshing rotor geometry (PES 3). The mixer
was cooled by a water system of different
circuits for the rotors and the chamber. The
Table 1. Recipe to study the effects of different carbon black fines contents.
Ingredients
Density/(kg/dm3)
Parts/(phr)
0,880
1,800
150 (100)
115
0,881
31 (81)
2
16
Total
314
Rotor Speed/rpm
Time/s
1. Feeding Polymer
2. Polymer Crumbling
3. Feeding Carbon Black, Sulphur,
Oil and Chemicals
4. Mixing
5. Cleaning
6. Mixing
7. Dumping
35
35
25
20
20
20
40
180
10
60
10
Mixing procedure
A one step mixing procedure was applied
(Table 2). Every carbon black adjustment
was mixed 3 times. The third batch of
each set was examined. The mixer was
heated up with two batches before the actual experiment started. The data presented in this paper exists of mean values,
gained from 3 repeat tests.
Characterization of compounds
The characterization of the compound
quality was performed using standard
methods such as: Rheometer MDR 2000
(at 0.58 strain, 180 8C) according to ISO
6502; Mooney viscosity ML (1 4)
100 8C according to ISO 289; Mooney
Scorch (at 145 8C); hardness Shore A; density; tensile strength; tear strength, elonga-
Temperature/ 8C
40
110
122
tion at break; stress-strain behavior (Modulus M 100); compression set (70 h/100 8C)
and 22 h, 25% according to ISO 815.
More sophisticated methods like e.g. the
RELMA method and the Rubber Processing
Analyzer (RPA) [4] were employed also. The
carbon black macro-dispersion was determined optically [5] and mechanically [6]. In
addition the Garvey Die test was used to
characterize the extrusion behaviour of
compounds. The RELMA method, which
is usually not applied in the rubber mixing
room, will be introduced as follows:
A pulsed laser beam produces a plasma on
the surface of a sample. The material is ablated from the surface and enters a plasma
cloud. The electrons of the outer orbits are
brought to a higher energy level, which is
an unstable condition. Going back to a
lower energy level, specific radiation is
emitted which can be attributed to chemical elements. This radiation can be detected with spectroscopic methods. As
the measuring time is quite short, the system can work with a frequency of 25 Hz.
By scanning the surface, the content of
chemical elements at each measured
spot can be indicated. By statistical methods the distribution of the elements in the
surface can be determined [7].
251
Fig. 2. Batch temperature during the mixing cycle in dependence of mixing time and the parameter carbon black fines content.
252
Fig. 6. MH ML and cure rate (MH ML)/(t90 t10 ) at 20 minutes measuring time, 170 8C and 0.5% strain in dependence of the carbon black
fines content.
253
254
Fig. 11. Die swell at 50 rpm in dependence of the carbon black fines content.
Fig. 12. Mean values of intensity ratio and variation coefficient between
the analyt (zinc and sulphur) and reference elements (carbon) in dependence of the carbon black fines content, determined with the RELMA
method.
Interpretion of results
The results presented before can be interpreted as dispersion problems in most
cases. The consistency of the mechanical
properties, the compression set, the die
255
Fig. 13. a) carbon black pellet fragments forming bigger agglomerates; b) compression and break
down of the agglomerates, caused by the mixing process; c) formation of carbon black clusters
during the dispersion process.
256
Acknowledgment
The results were obtained in the Mini Derucom project, which was financially supported by European Commission, whom
References
[1] K.-H. Freitag, Schuttgut 1 (1995) Nr. 1, 115.
[2] H. Keuter, A. Limper, A. Wehmeier, T. Riedemann
and K.H. Freitag, Schuttgut 6 (2000) 385.
[3] H.M. Schmid, KGK 35 (1982) 674.
[4] J.L. Leblanc and C. de la Chapelle, ACS Meeting,
Cleveland, 2001 USA.
[5] H. Geisler, VDI-K Seminar Mischungsherstellung
fur Elastomere Workshop mit praktischen Versuchen.
[6] A. Wehmeier, Diplomarbeit Fachhochschule
Munster, (1998).
[7] H. Keuter, D. Ackfeld and A. Limper, KGK 53
(2000) 566.
[8] W.M. Hess, R.A. Swor and E.J. Micek, Rubber
Chem. Technol. 57 (1984) 959.
[9] J.W.M. Noordermeer and M.J.M. Wilms, KGK 7
(1991), 679.
[10] M.L. Studebaker in Reinforcement of Elastomers; Intersc. Publ. (1965), chapter 12.
[11] A.R. Payne, Journal of Applied Polymer Science 9
(1965) 3245.
[12] R.H. Schuster, Interner Bericht W.d.K. (1989).
[13] A.J. Medalia and J. Coll. Interface Sci. 32 (1979)
115.
[14] A.J. Medalia and F.A. Heckmann, Carbon 7 (1969)
567.
[15] W. Hader and C.-J. Lorenzen, Technische Mitteilungen Krupp 2/1992.
[16] S. Wolff, KGK 23 (1970) 7.
[17] S. Shiga and M. Furuta, Rubber Chem. Techn. 58
(1985) 22.
[18] G. Kraus, Rubber Chem. Techn. 38 (1965) 1070.
[19] B.B. Boonstra and A.J. Medalia, Rubber Age (N.Y.)
92 (1963) 892.
[20] W.M. Hess, ACS Meeting, Rubber Division, New
Orleans, 1975, USA.
[21] A.M. Gessler, Rubber Chem. Techn. 43 (1973)
943.
[22] A.J. Medalia and G.J. Horniek, Pattern Recognition 4 (1972) 1955.
[23] W.M. Hess, V.E. Chirico and K.A. Burgess, KGK 26
(1973) 344.
Authors
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Andreas Limper is a Professor at the
University of Paderborn. Dipl.-Ing. Harald Keuter,
is working as a scientific co-worker at the Institut
fur Kunststofftechnik of the University in Paderborn. Dipl.-Ing. Carsten Ruter, is a technical manager of Thona SA.
Corresponding author
Prof. Dr. A. Limper
Institut fur Kunststofftechnik
Pohlweg 47 49
33098 Paderborn
257