Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
graph score (A+), first edition of the moved during the engraving!]. See have cresc. until note 2. Our edition
score in its first and second issues the JBG Editorial Report, p. 199. follows A+ and FEP. See the JBG Edi-
(FES), first edition of the parts (FEP), 167–177: FES2H (due to an engraver’s torial Report, p. 204.
autograph of the arrangement for pi- error) in vn II und va in M 167 and
ano, 4-hands (A-K+) and first edition of 177, along with vn I und vc in M 169 Agitato (Allegretto non troppo)
the arrangement for piano, 4-hands and 175, has slur on notes 1–2 and Va upbeat: A+ lacks espress., which pos-
(FEK) are used as corrective reference 3–4. We follow A+ as well as A-K+ sibly derives from a suggestion by
sources. and FEK, interpreting the slur as a Joseph Joachim and was only added
triplet slur that is not reproduced in at proof-correction stage. See the JBG
the present musical text. See the JBG Editorial Report, p. 205.
Individual comments
Editorial Report, p. 199 f., as well as 13–18 vn I: The deletion of a slur
Since the following individual com-
the section Zur Gestaltung des No- at notes 1–3 of M 13 in A+, along
ments are kept as brief as possible, us-
tentextes on p. XXV there. with notes in the margin, may also
ers are advised to consult the detailed
212–220: In A+ Brahms added the u for indicate a change in phrasing for
Editorial Report in the new Johannes
vn II in T 212–213. That it was also M 14–18 that was not, however, pur-
Brahms Gesamtausgabe (JBG II/3,
to serve as an abbreviated notation sued further. Possibly it is connected
p. 198–214).
for the other parts is confirmed by with inquiries to Joseph Joachim. See
FEP. See the JBG Editorial Report, the JBG Editorial Report, p. 205.
Vivace p. 201. See also M 8–12. 57: A+ originally had in tempo here.
8–12 vn I/II, vc: A+ lacks the u in 291 vc: A+ (likely an erroneous inter- Corrected following an inquiry to
M 10–12 of the vc; these were added vention by the publisher’s reader in Joseph Joachim. See the JBG Editori-
by Brahms in the vn I/II parts. See fine pencil) and FES2H (an editorial al Report, p. 206.
the JBG Editorial Report, p. 198. or correction error) have a slur on 88 f. va: The espress. marking added
84 vc: A+ (likely an erroneous interven- notes 2–4. Our edition follows later to A+ possibly comes from a
tion by the publisher’s reader in fine Brahms’s instruction in A+: nicht das suggestion by Joseph Joachim.
pencil) and FES2H (an editorial or Manuscript korrigiren! [do not cor- Brahms added z in M 89 at the
correction error), probably by analo- rect the manuscript!]. See the JBG same time. See the JBG Editorial Re-
gy to vn I and M 82 vc or to match Editorial Report, p. 201. port, p. 208.
the model for FEP, have an added
slur on notes 2–4. Our edition fol- Andante
lows Brahms’s added instruction in 61 vn I: FES2H (probably because of in- Leipzig, spring 2007
A+: muß weg im Stich! [must be re- exactitude by the engraver) does not Salome Reiser